Memory & Cognition

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 418–429 | Cite as

Wishful thinking and source monitoring

Article

Abstract

Memory distortions sometimes serve a purpose: It may be in our interest to misremember some details of an event or to forget others altogether. The present work examines whether a similar phenomenon occurs for source attribution. Given that the source of a memory provides information about the accuracy of its content, people may be biased toward source attributions that are consistent with desired accuracy. In Experiment 1, participants read desirable and undesirable predictions made by sources differing in their a priori reliability and showed awishful thinking bias—that is, a bias to attribute desirable predictions to the reliable source and undesirable predictions to the unreliable source. Experiment 2 showed that this wishful thinking effect depends on retrieval processes. Experiment 3 showed that under some circumstances, wishes concerning one event can produce systematic source memory errors for others.

References

  1. Allport, G. W., &Postman, L. J. (1945). The basic psychology of rumor.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,8, 61–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., &Berger, S. A. (1996). Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades.Psychological Science,7, 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentall, R. P. (1990). The illusion of reality: A review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 82–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boon, J., &Davies, G. (1996). Extra-stimulus influences on eyewitness perception and recall: Hastorf and Cantril revisited.Legal & Criminological Psychology,1, 155–164.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions.Consciousness & Cognition,12, 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dellarosa, D., &Bourne, L. E. (1984). Decisions and memory: Differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidence.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ditto, P. H., Jemmott, J. B., &Darley, J. M. (1988). Appraising the threat of illness: A mental representational approach.Health Psychology, 7, 183–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greene, E. (1981). Whodunit? Memory for evidence in text.American Journal of Psychology,94, 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.American Psychologist,35, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,27, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Intraub, H., &Hoffman, J. E. (1992). Reading and visual memory: Remembering scenes that were never seen.American Journal of Psychology, 105, 101–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., &Leach, K. (1988). The consequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice.Memory & Cognition, 16, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., &De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahan, T. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1992). Self effects in memory for person information.Social Cognition,10, 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,108, 480–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (2004).Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., &Hicks, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 886–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mather, M., &Johnson, M. K. (2000). Choice-supportive source monitoring: Do our decisions seem better to us as we age?Psychology & Aging,15, 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mather, M., Shafir, E., &Johnson, M. K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice.Psychological Science, 11, 132–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mather, M., Shafir, E., &Johnson, M. K. (2003). Remembering chosen and assigned options.Memory & Cognition,31, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, J. (1996). The sampling distribution ofd′.Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrison, A., &Haddock, G. (1997). Cognitive factors in source monitoring and auditory hallucinations.Psychological Medicine,27, 669–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Perloff, L. S., &Fetzer, B. K. (1986). Self—other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,50, 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R. J., &Bailis, D. S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., &Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,35, 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ross, M., McFarland, C., &Fletcher, G. J. (1981). The effect of attitude on the recall of personal histories.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,40, 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sherman, J. W., &Bessenoff, G. R. (1999). Stereotypes as sourcemonitoring cues: On the interaction between episodic and semantic memory.Psychological Science,10, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, S. E. (1989).Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Viscusi, K. (1992).Smoking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Weinstein, N. D., &Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future.Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology,15, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Woike, B., &Polo, M. (2001). Motive-related memories: Content, structure, and affect.Journal of Personality,69, 391–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois Institute of TechnologyInstitute of PsychologyChicago
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyState University of New YorkStony Brook

Personalised recommendations