Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 665–671 | Cite as

BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish

Article

Abstract

This article describes a Windows program that enables users to obtain a broad range of statistics concerning the properties of word and nonword stimuli in Spanish, including word frequency, syllable frequency, bigram and biphone frequency, orthographic similarity, orthographic and phonological structure, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, valence, arousal, and age-of-acquisition measures. It is designed for use by researchers in psycholinguistics, particularly those concerned with recognition of isolated words. The program computes measures of orthographic similarity online, with respect to either a default vocabulary of 31,491 Spanish words or a vocabulary specified by the user. In addition to providing standard orthographic and phonological neighborhood measures, the program can be used to obtain information about other forms of orthographic similarity, such as transposed-letter similarity and embedded-word similarity. It is available, free of charge, from the following Web site: www.maccs.mq.edu.au/~colin/B-Pal.

References

  1. Alameda, J. R., &Cuetos, F. (1995).Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., &Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition?Language & Cognitive Processes,19, 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., &Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 775–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., &Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words.Memory & Cognition,29, 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., &Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”?Journal of Memory & Language,52, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., &de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 766–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carreiras, M., &Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1228–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carreiras, M., &Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency.Brain & Language,90, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505.Google Scholar
  13. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., &Álvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 650–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.Behavior Research Methods,37, 65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, C. J., &Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 904–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect.Cognition & Emotion,15, 143–165.Google Scholar
  20. James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Juilland, A., &Chang-Rodríguez, E. (1964).Frequency dictionary of Spanish words. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  22. Mathey, S., &Zagar, D. (2000). The neighborhood distribution effect in visual word recognition: Words with single and twin neighbors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 184–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., &Ferrand, L. (2004).Lexique 2: A new French lexical database.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perea, M., &Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (in press). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a phonological level?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar
  26. Perea, M., &Lupker, S. J. (2003). Doesjugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.Memory & Cognition,31, 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perea, M., &Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perea, M., &Rosa, E. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review.Psicológica,21, 327–340.Google Scholar
  29. Pérez, M. A. (2004).Influencia del orden de adquisición del léxico en el reconocimiento de palabras. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
  30. Pérez, M. A., Alameda, J. R., &Cuetos, F. (2003). Frecuencia, longitud y vecindad ortográfica de las palabras de 3 a 16 letras del Diccionario de la Lengua Española (RAE, 1992).Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada,8, 1–10.Google Scholar
  31. Pugh, K., Rexer, K., &Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 807–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rastle, K., &Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords.Journal of Memory & Language,42, 342–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Real Academia de la Lengua (1995).Diccionario de la lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
  34. Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Comesaña, M., &Perea, M. (2005). Estudio normativo del valor afectivo de 478 palabras españolas.Psicológica,26, 317–326.Google Scholar
  35. Santiago, J., Justicia, F., Palma, A., Huertas, D., &Gutiérrez, N. (1996). LEX I and II: Two databases of surface word forms for psycholinguistic research in Spanish.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoonbaert, S., &Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters.Language & Cognitive Processes,19, 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Cuetos, F., &Carreiras, M. (2000).LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  38. Taft, M., &van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Heuven, W. J. B., &Dijkstra, T. (2005).Extended neighborhood effects in visual word recognition. Poster presented at the XIV meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Leiden.Google Scholar
  40. Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Departament de MetodologiaFacultat de Psicología, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21ValènciaSpain

Personalised recommendations