Advertisement

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 72, Issue 5, pp 1404–1421 | Cite as

Time stretching: Illusory lengthening of filled auditory durations

  • Takayuki Sasaki
  • Yoshitaka Nakajima
  • Gert Ten Hoopen
  • Edwin Van Buuringen
  • Bob Massier
  • Taku Kojo
  • Tsuyoshi Kuroda
  • Kazuo Ueda
Research Articles
  • 367 Downloads

Abstract

The second of two consecutively presented sounds may be perceivedas being longer than if that sound had been presentedin isolation. Weperformedfive experimentsusingheterophonicpatterns in whicha sinetone was precededby a frequency-band noise. Weobserved significantoverestimations of sine-toneduration,the size of whichdependedon intensityandfrequency differencesbetweenthebandnoise and the sinetone(Experiments1 and 2). Band noises that were considerably shorter than the sine tone still caused significant overestimations (Experiment3). A short silent gap between the band noise and the sine tone strongly reduced the amount of overestimation (Experiment4). Bothfrozenand nonfrozenbandnoisesyielded overestimations (Experiment5). Ourexplanation for the overestimation is that the onset of the sinetone is blurred by the bandnoiseand that such a blurred onset is restored at the level of perceptual organizationfollowingrules of a simpleauditorygrammar. This restorationtakes mentalprocessingtime, which addsto the perceivedduration of the sine tone. Wecall this illusiontimestretchingand discuss the notion that subsequenttemporalassimilation and/orcontrasteffects can dilate or compressthe amount of stretching.

Keywords

Stimulus Pattern Band Noise Duration Judgment Journal Ofthe Acoustical Society ofAmerica Auditory Stream 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akerboom, S., Ten Hoopen, G., Ouerook, P.,& Van Der Schaaf, T. (1983). Auditory spatial alternation transforms auditory time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, B., Balabanova, D., Van Bommel, M., Hovers, M., & Vlasblom, K. (1994). De invloed van de heter of onische continuiteitsillusie op waargenomen toonduur (The influence of the heterophonic continuity illusion on perceived tone duration). Unpublished research report for the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, K. B., Parasuraman, R., Howard, J. H., Jr., & O’toole, A. J. (1984). Auditory induction of discrete tones in signal detection tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 570–578.Google Scholar
  4. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bregman, A. S., & Dannenbring, G. L. (1977). Auditory continuity and amplitude edges. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 151–159. doi: 10.1037lh0081658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciocca, V., & Bregman, A. S. (1987). Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 476–484.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, D. (1986). Auditory pattern recognition. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch, D. (1999). Grouping mechanisms in music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 299–348). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elfner, L. E., & Caskey, W. E. (1965). Continuity effects with alternately sounded noise and tone signals as a function of manner of presentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 543–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fastl, H., & Zwicker, E. (2006). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models (3rd ed.), Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception: Vol. 8. Perceptual coding (pp. 203–254). New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Friberg, A., & Sundberg, J. (1995). Time discrimination in a monotonic, isochronous sequence. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 98, 2524–2531. doi:l0.1121/1.413218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geisser, H.-G., & Kompass, R. (2003). Invariants in mental timing: From taxonomic relations to task-related modeling. In H. Helfrich (Ed.), Time and mind II: Information processing perspectives (pp. 185–207). Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  14. Handel, S. (1989). Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hartmann, W. M., & Pumplin, J. (1988). Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 2277–2289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Houtgast, T. (1972). Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 18851894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanafuka, K., Nakajima, Y., Remijn, G. B., Sasaki, T., & Tanaka, S. (2007). Subjectively divided tone components in the gap transfer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kluender, K. R., & Jenison, R. L. (1992). Effects of glide slope, noise intensity, and noise duration on the extrapolation of FM glides through noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 231–238.Google Scholar
  19. Kuroda, T., Nakajima, Y., Tsunashima, S., & Yasutake, T. (2009). Effects of spectra and sound pressure levels on the occurrence of the gap transfer illusion. Perception, 38, 411–428. doi: I 0.1068/p6032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, G. A., & Licklider, J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22,167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitsudo, T., Nakajima, Y., Remijn, G. B., Takeichi, H., Goto, Y., & Tobimatsu, S. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence of auditory temporal perception related to the assimilation between two neighboring time intervals. NeuroQuantology, 7, 114–127.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, B. C. J. (2003). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (5th ed.) San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nakajima, Y. (1987). A model of empty duration perception. Perception, 16, 485–520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakajima, Y. (1996, August). A simple grammarfor auditory organization: Streams, events, andsubevents. Paper presented at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology, Montreal.Google Scholar
  25. Nakajima, Y. (2006a). Auditory grammar: The event construction model and spoken language [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3203–3204.Google Scholar
  26. Nakajima, Y. (2006b). Demonstrations of the gap transfer illusion. Acoustical Science & Technology, 27, 322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakajima, Y. (2008). Illusions related to auditory grammar: Ten demonstrations in musical contexts. In K. Miyazaki, Y. Hiraga, M. Adachi, Y. Nakajima, & M. Tsuzaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, (pp. 301–304). Sapporo, Japan.Google Scholar
  28. Nakajima, Y., Nishimura, S., & Teranishi, R. (1988). Ratio judgments of empty durations with numeric scales. Perception, 17, 93118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakajima, Y., & Sasaki, T. (1996, December). A simple grammar of auditory stream formation. Third Joint Meeting Acoustical Society of America and Acoustical Society of Japan. Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  30. Nakajima, Y., Sasaki, T., Kanafuka, K., Miyamoto, A., Remijn, G., & Ten Hoopen, G. (2000). Illusory recouplings of onsets and terminations of glide tone components. Perception & Psychophysics, 62,1413–1425.Google Scholar
  31. Nakajima, Y., Sasaki, T., Remijn, G. B., & Ueda, K. (2004). Perceptual organization of onsets and of fsets of sounds. Journal of Physiological Anthropology & Applied Human Science, 23, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakajima, Y., Ten Hoopen, G., Hilkhuysen, G., & Sasaki, T. (1992). Time shrinking: A discontinuity in the perception of auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 504–507. doi:l0.l068/pI70093Google Scholar
  33. Nakajima, Y., Ten Hoopen, G., Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, K., Kadota, M., Simons, M., & Suetomi, D. (2004). Time-shrinking: The process of unilateral temporal assimilation. Perception, 33, 1061–1079. doi:10.1068/p5061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakajima, Y.,Ten Hoopen, G., & Van Der Wilk, R. G. H. (1991). A new illusion of time perception. Music Perception, 8, 431–448.Google Scholar
  35. Plomp, R. (1981). Perception of sound signals at low signal-to-noise ratios. In D. J. Getty & J. H. Howard,Jr. (Eds.), Auditory and visual pattern recognition (pp. 27–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Plomp, R. (2002). The intelligent ear: On the nature of sound perception. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Reiss, C. (2007). Modularity in the sound domain: Implications for the purview of universal grammar. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 53–80). Oxford: OxfordUniversityPress.Google Scholar
  38. Remun, G. B., & Nakajima, Y. (2005).The perceptual integration of auditory stimulus edges: An illusory short tone in stimulus patterns consisting of two partly overlapping glides. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 183–192. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Remijn, G. B., Nakajima, Y.,& Tanaka, S. (2007). Perceptualcompletion of a sound with a short silent gap. Perception, 36, 898–917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Remijn, G. B., Pérez, E., Nakajima, Y., & Ito, H. (2008). Frequency modulationfacilitates (modal) auditory restoration of a gap. Hearing Research, 243, 113–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Remijn, G. B., Van Der Meulen, G., Ten Hoopen, G., Nakajima, Y., Komori, Y.,& Sasakj, T. (1999). On the robustness of time-shrinking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E), 20, 365–373.Google Scholar
  42. Riecke, L., Van Opstal, A. J., & Formisano, E. (2008). The auditory continuity illusion:A parametric investigation and filter model. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1–12.doi:1O.3758/PP.70.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sasaki, T., Nakajima, Y., & Ten Hoopen, G. (1993). The effect of a preceding neighboring tone on the perception of filled durations [In Japanese,withEnglish figure captions].Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Japan, spring meeting (pp. 347–348). Tokyo: Acoustical Society of Japan.Google Scholar
  44. Sasakj, T., Suetoml, D., Nakajima, Y., & Ten Hoopen, G. (2002). Time-shrinking, its propagation,and Gestaltprinciples. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 919–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scharf, B., & Houtsma, A. J. M. (1986).AuditionII: Loudness, pitch, localization, aural distortion and pathology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 15.1–15.60). NewYork: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Simons, M. (1995). TIme swelling: An incomplete heterophonic induction in a nonrepetitive design. Unpublished master’s thesis, Leiden University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  47. Suetomi, D., & Nakajima, Y. (1998). How stable is time-shrinking? Journal of Music Perception & Cognition, 4,19–25.Google Scholar
  48. Takeichi, H., Mitsudo, T., Nakajima, Y., Remijn, G. B., Goto, Y., & Tobimatsu, S. (in press).A neural decodingapproach to auditory temporalassimilation. Neural Computing & Applications.Google Scholar
  49. Ten Hoopen, G. (1992, February). Temporal processing of fast auditory patterns. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conferenceon Music Perceptionand Cognition, LosAngeles.Google Scholar
  50. Ten Hoopen, G., Boelaarts, L., Gruisen, A. Apon, I., Donders, K., Mul, N., & Akerboom, S. (1994). The detection of anisochrony in monauraland interaural sound sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 56,110–120.Google Scholar
  51. Ten Hoopen, G., Hartsuiker, R., Sasaki, T., Nakajima, Y., Tanaka, M., & Tsumura, T. (1995).Auditory isochrony:Time shrinking and temporal patterns. Perception, 24, 577–593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ten Hoopen, G., Hilkhuysen, G., Vis, G., Nakajima, Y., Yamauchi, E., & Sasakj, T. (1993). Anewillusion of time perception:II. Music Perception, 11, 15–38.Google Scholar
  53. Ten Hoopen, G., Miyauchi, R., & Nakajima, Y. (2008). Time-based illusionsin the auditorymode.In S. Grondin (Ell), Psychology of time (pp. 139–188). Bingley,U.K.: EmeraldGroup.Google Scholar
  54. Ten Hoopen, G., Vos, J., & Dispa, J. (1982). Interaural and monaural clicks and clocks:Tempodifferenceversus attentionswitching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8,422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thurlow, W. R. (1957). An auditory figure-ground effect. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 653–654.doi:l0.2307/1419466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ueda, K.,& Ohtsukj, M. (1996). Theeffect of soundpressureleveldifferenceon filled durationextension. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E),17, 159–161.Google Scholar
  57. Van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  58. Vicario, G. (1960). L’effettotunnel acustico. Rivista di Psicologia, 54, 41–52.Google Scholar
  59. Von Klitzing, R., & Kohlrausch, A. (1994). Effect of maskerlevelon overshootin running-andfrozen-noise maskers. Journal of the A coustical Society of America, 95, 2192–2201.doi:lO.l12111.408679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warren, R. M. (1982). Auditoryperception:A new synthesis. NewYork: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  61. Warren, R. M. (1999). Auditoryperception: A new analysis and synthesis. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPreSS.Google Scholar
  62. Warren, R. M. (2008). Auditoryperception: An analysis and synthesis. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Warren, R. M., Bashford, J. A., Jr., Healy, E. W.,& Brubaker, B. S. (1994). Auditory induction: Reciprocalchangesin alternatingsounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 313–322.Google Scholar
  64. Warren, R. M., Obusek, C. J., & Ackroff, J. M. (1972). Auditory induction: Perceptual synthesis of absent sounds. Science, 176, 1149–1151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wrightson, J. M., & Warren, R. M. (1981). Incompleteauditory induction of tones alternated with noise: Effects occurring below the pulsation threshold [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, S105-S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Sasaki
    • 1
  • Yoshitaka Nakajima
    • 2
  • Gert Ten Hoopen
    • 3
  • Edwin Van Buuringen
    • 3
  • Bob Massier
    • 3
  • Taku Kojo
    • 2
  • Tsuyoshi Kuroda
    • 2
  • Kazuo Ueda
    • 2
  1. 1.Miyagi Gakuin Women’s UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Leiden UniversityLeidenTheNetherlands

Personalised recommendations