Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 695–705 | Cite as

Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following

  • Christoph Teufel
  • Dean M. Alexis
  • Nicola S. Clayton
  • Greg Davis
Research Articles
  • 711 Downloads

Abstract

When presented with a face stimulus whose gaze is diverted, observers’ attention shifts to locations fixated by the face. Such “gaze following” has been characterized by some previous studies as a consequence of sophisticated theory of mind processes, but by others (particularly those employing the “gaze-cuing” paradigm) as an involuntary response that is triggered directly and reflexively by the physical features of a face. To address this apparent contradiction, we modified the gaze-cuing paradigm using a deception procedure to convince observers that prerecorded videos of an experimenter making head turns and wearing mirrored goggles were a “live” video link to an adjacent room. In two experiments, reflexive gaze following was found when observers believed that the model was wearing transparent goggles and could see, but it was significantly reduced when they believed that the experimenter wore opaque goggles and could not see. These results indicate that the attribution of the mental state “seeing” to a face plays a role in controlling even reflexive gaze following.

References

  1. Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origin and role in development (pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting of attention via observed eye gaze is head-centred. Cognition, 94, B1-B10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 631–650.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). The importance of eyes: How infants interpret adult looking behavior. Developmental Psychology, 38, 958–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 8, 535–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caron, A. J., Butler, S., & Brooks, R. (2002). Gaze following at 12 and 14 months: Do the eyes matter? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caron, A. J., Kiel, E. J., Dayton, M., & Butler, S. C. (2002). Comprehension of the referential intent of looking and pointing between 12 and 15 months. Journal of Cognition & Development, 3, 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), 1–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chow, V., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Lewis, J. (2008). To see or not to see: Infants prefer to follow the gaze of a reliable looker. Developmental Science, 11, 761–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downing, P. E., Dodds, C. M., & Bray, D. (2004). Why does the gaze of others direct visual attention? Visual Cognition, 11, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eimer, M. (1997). Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 46, 67–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Baird, J. A. (2005). Is there a “social brain”? Lessons from eye-gaze following, joint attention, and autism. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 75–90). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Flom, R., Lee, K., & Muir, D. (2007). Gaze-following: Its development and significance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friesen, C. K., Moore, C., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention? Brain & Cognition, 57, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friesen, C. K., Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frischen, A., Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The roles of time course and fixation cue. Visual Cognition, 15, 881–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frischen, A., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 516–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17, R724-R732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomez, J. C. (2005). Species comparative studies and cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 118–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heyes, C. M. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 101–148.Google Scholar
  26. Hietanen, J. K. (2002). Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation. Psychological Research, 66, 174–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hietanen, J. K., Nummenmaa, L., Nyman, M. J., Parkkola, R., & Hämäläinen, H. (2006). Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 33, 406–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Kingstone, A., Friesen, C. K., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Reflexive joint attention depends on lateralized cortical connections. Psychological Science, 11, 159–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Langdon, R., & Smith, P. (2005). Spatial cueing by social versus nonsocial directional signals. Visual Cognition, 12, 1497–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langton, S. R. H., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6, 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 578–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mathews, A., Fox, E., Yiend, J., & Calder, A. (2003). The face of fear: Effects of eye gaze and emotion on visual attention. Visual Cognition, 10, 823–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meltzoff, A. N., & Brooks, R. (2007). Eyes wide shut: The importance of eyes in infant gaze-following and understanding other minds. In R. Flom, K. Lee, & D. Muir (Eds.), Gaze-following: Its development and significance (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Meltzoff, A. N., & Brooks, R. (2008). Self-experience as a mechanism for learning about others: A training study in social cognition. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1257–1265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2004). 12-and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. Developmental Science, 7, F1-F9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore, C., & Dunham, P. (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Murphy, F. C., & Klein, R. M. (1998). The effects of nicotine on spatial and non-spatial expectancies in a covert orienting task. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1103–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nuku, P., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Joint attention: Inferring what others perceive (and don’t perceive). Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nummenmaa, L., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 135–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 835–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2002). Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition, 94, B55-B65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scaife, M., & Bruner, J. S. (1975). Capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253, 265–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schloegl, C., Kotrschal, K., & Bugnyar, T. (2007). Gaze following in common ravens, Corvus corax: Ontogeny and habituation. Animal Behaviour, 74, 769–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). “Cognitive ethology” for humans: Inconvenient truth or attentional deficit? British Journal of Psychology, 99, 347–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Dairoku, H., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 45, 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tipples, J. (2006). Fear and fearfulness potentiate automatic orienting to eye gaze. Cognition & Emotion, 20, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tipples, J. (2008). Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (1998). Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1063–1069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In N. J. Castellan & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 3, pp. 199–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, A. L. (2003). Infants’ developing understanding of the link between looker and object. Developmental Science, 6, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Teufel
    • 1
  • Dean M. Alexis
    • 1
  • Nicola S. Clayton
    • 1
  • Greg Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Brain Mapping Unit, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations