Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 71, Issue 6, pp 1219–1227 | Cite as

Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: Pitfalls and improved estimators

Brief Reports
  • 521 Downloads

Abstract

Discrimination performance is often assessed by measuring the difference limen (DL; or just noticeable difference) in a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task. Here, we show that the DL estimated from 2AFC percentage-correct data is likely to systematically under- or overestimate true discrimination performance if order effects are present. We show how pitfalls with the 2AFC task may be avoided and suggest a novel approach for analyzing 2AFC data.

References

  1. Bush, R. R. (1967). Estimation and evaluation. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 429–469). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Eisler, H., Eisler, A. D., & Hellström, Å. (2008). Psychophysical issues in the study of time perception. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 75–109). Bingely, U.K.: Emerald.Google Scholar
  3. Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik (Erster Teil) [Elements of Psychophysics (Vol. 1)]. Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf & Härtel. [Citation is based on the third unchanged edition, which was published in 1907 by Breitkopf & Härtel]Google Scholar
  4. Gescheider, G. A. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1973). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley. [1988 reprint edition published by Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, CA]Google Scholar
  6. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Hairston, I. S., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2007). Neural mechanisms of the time-order error: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1163–1174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey, L. O. J. (1986). Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellström, Å. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processing in comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein, S. A. (2001). Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1421–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lapid, E., Ulrich, R., & Rammsayer, T. (2008). On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luce, R. D., & Galanter, E. (1967). Discrimination. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 191–244). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Morgan, M. J., Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & McKee, S. P. (2000). The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds. Vision Research, 40, 2341–2349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nachmias, J. (2006). The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination. Vision Research, 46, 2456–2464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simpson, W. A. (1989). The step method: A new adaptive psychophysical procedure. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2004). Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: The Spearman—Kärber method. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ulrich, R., Nitschke, J., & Rammsayer, T. (2006). Crossmodal temporal discrimination: Assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker— counter model. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1140–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Woodrow, H. (1935). The effect of practice on time-order errors in the comparison of temporal intervals. Psychological Review, 42, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeshurun, Y., Carrasco, M., & Maloney, L. T. (2008). Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model. Vision Research, 48, 1837–1851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Psychological InstituteUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.University of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations