Abstract
Three observers viewed visual representations of eight complex sounds in both a pairwise similarity-judgment task and an identification task. A multidimensional scaling procedure applied to the similarity judgments yielded a three-dimensional perceptual space and the relative positions of the stimuli in that space. A probabilistic decision model based on weighted interstimulus distances served to predict well the confusion matrices of the identification task. Three conditions of the identification task, calling for identification of different subsets of the eight stimuli, led the observers to vary the weights they placed on the dimensions; they apparently adjusted the weights to maximize the percent correct identification. An additional group of 14 subjects, participating only in the similarity-judgment task, manifested the same three dimensions as the observers (corresponding to the locus of low-frequency energy, the locus of midfrequency energy, and visual contrast), and also a fourth dimension (corresponding to the periodicity, or waxing and waning, of the sound). Although not evident in the scaling analysis for the three observers, our utilization of the additional dimension increased significantly the variance accounted for in their identification responses. The overall accuracy of the predictions from a perceptual space to identification responses supplies a substantial validation of the use of multidimensional scaling procedures to reveal perceptual structure in demonstrating the ability of that structure to account for behavior in an independent task. The empirical success of this approach, furthermore, suggests a relatively simple and practical means of predicting, and possibly enhancing, identification performance for a given set of visual or auditory stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Hardzinski, M., & Pachella, R. G.A psychophysical analysis of complex integrated displays. [Technical Report 59 (014523-2-T)]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, February 1977.
References
Carroll, J. D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Carroll, J. D., &Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 288–319.
Carroll, J. D., &Wish, M. Models and methods for three-way multidimensional scaling. In R. C. Atkinson, D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973.
Howard, J. H., Jr. The psychophysical structure of eight complex underwater sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,62, 149–156.
Howard, J. H., Jr., &Silverman, E. G. A multidimensional scaling analysis of 16 complex sounds.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 193–200.
Klein, W., Plomp, R., &Pols, L. C. W. Vowel spectra, vowel spaces, and vowel identification.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970,48, 999–1009.
Luce, R. D. Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1963.
Miller, J. R., &Carterette, E. C. Perceptual space for musical structures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975,58, 711–720.
Morgan, B. J. T., Woodhead, M. M., &Webster, J. C. On the recovery of physical dimensions of stimuli, using multidimensional scaling.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60, 186–189.
Pachella, R. G., & Somers, P. The development of integrated multidimensional displays.Naval Research Reviews, in press.
Plomp, R., &Steeneken, H. J. M. Effect of phase on the timbre of complex tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969,46, 409–421.
Pols, L. C. W., Van Der Kamp, L. J. Th., &Plomp, R. Perceptual and physical space of vowel sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969,46, 458–467.
Romney, A. K., Shepand, R. N., &Nerlove, S. B. (Eds.).Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol. II). New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Shaw, D. J. A phonological interpretation of two acoustic confusion matrices.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 537–542.
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 325–345.
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model.Psychological Review, 1958,65, 242–256. (a)
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958,55, 509–523. (b)
Shepard, R. N. Psychological representation of speech sounds. In E. David & P. Denes (Eds.),Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
Shepard, R. N., &Chipman, S. Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 1–17.
Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., &Nealove, S. B. (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol. I). New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Stenson, H. H. The psychophysical dimensions of similarity among random shapes.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968,3, 201–214.
Swets, J. A., Green, D. A., Getty, D. J., &Swets, J. B. Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 275–289.
Tversky, A., &Krantz, D. H. The dimensional representation and the metric structure of similarity data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970,7, 572–596.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a contract with the Engineering Psychology Programs, Office of Naval Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Getty, D.J., Swets, J.A., Swets, J.B. et al. On the prediction of confusion matrices from similarity judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 26, 1–19 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199856
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199856