Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tip-of-the-tongue in aging: influence of vocabulary, working memory and processing speed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: It is well known that tip-of-the-tongue (ToT) states, which are due to failure in the phonological activation of words, especially proper names, are more common in older than in younger adults. Nevertheless, the relationship between increased numbers of ToTs and cognitive aging remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to clarify this relationship by examining ToT production and the performance of cognitive tasks such as working memory and processing speed tests. Methodology: In order to study the relationships between these constructs, the performance of 133 participants in different language, working memory and processing speed tasks was analysed by use of LISREL software. Results: The best fit model included direct and indirect effects of age, mediated by cognitive variables, on lexical production variables. The model incorporated the indirect effects of age on vocabulary through working memory and also the indirect effect of age on ToT through processing speed. Conclusion: The results indicate negative modulation of slowed processing in the age-related increase of ToT and positive modulation of working memory in vocabulary, as well as an absence of any relation between vocabulary and ToT. Assuming that ToT events involve controlled processes, the relationship between slowed processing and ToT in aging could be interpreted as reflecting controlled compensatory mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacKay DG. The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke D, MacKay DG, Worthley JS, Wade E. On the Tip of the Tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?. J Mem Lang 1991; 30: 542–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Juncos-Rabadán O, Facal D, Álvarez M, Rodríguez MS. El fenómeno de la punta de la lengua en el proceso de envejecimiento [The phenomenon of the tip of the tongue in aging]. Psicothema 2006; 18: 501–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maylor EA. Age, blocking and the tip of the tongue state. Br J Psychol 1990; 81: 123–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown AS. A review of the tip of the tongue experience. Psychol Bull 1991; 109: 204–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown AS, Nix LA. Age-related changes in the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Am J Psychol 1996; 109: 79–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. White KK, Abrams L. Does priming specific syllables during tipof- the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults? Psychol Aging 2002; 17: 226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams L, Trunk DL, Merrill LA. Why a superman cannot help a tsunami: Activation of grammatical class influences resolution of young and older adultś tip-of-the-tongue states. Psychol Aging 2007; 22: 835–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evrard M. Ageing and lexical access to common and proper names in picture naming. Brain Lang 2002; 81: 174–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Facal-Mayo D, Juncos-Rabadán O, Álvarez M, Pereiro-Rozas AX, Díaz Fernández F. Efectos del envejecimiento en el acceso al léxico. El fenómeno de la punta de la lengua ante los nombres propios [Aging effects on lexical access. The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon on proper names]. Rev Neurol 2006; 43: 719–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. James LE. Specific effects of aging on proper name retrieval: Now you see them, now you don’t. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006; 61: P180–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowles RP, Salthouse TA. Vocabulary test format and differential relations to age. Psychol Aging 2008; 23: 366–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verhaeghen P. Aging and vocabulary scores: a metaanalysis. Psychol Aging 2003; 18: 332–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlgren DJ. Impact of knowledge and age on the tip-of-thetongue rates. Exp Aging Res 1998; 24: 139–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Juncos-Rabadán O, Facal D, Rodríguez MS, Pereiro AX. Lexical knowledge and lexical retrieval in ageing: Insights from a tip-ofthe- tongue (TOT) study. Lang Cogn Process 2010; 25: 1301–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Salthouse TA. Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1993; 48: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kemper S, Herman R, Lian C. Age differences in sentence production. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2003; 58: 260–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van der Linden M, Hupert M, Feyereisen P et al. Cognitive mediators of age-related differences in language: Comprehension and verbal memory performance. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 1999; 6: 32–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz BL. Working memory load differentially affects tip-ofthe- tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgment. Mem Cognit 2008; 36: 9–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Semenza C, Mondini S, Borgo F, Pasini M, Sgaramella MT. Proper names in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurocase 2003; 9: 63–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Juncos-Rabadán O, Rodríguez N, Facal D, Cuba J, Pereiro, AX. Tip-of-the-tongue for proper names in mild cognitive impairment. Semantic or post-semantic impairments? J Neurolinguist 2011; 24: 636–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Engle RW, Kane MJ. Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychol Learn Motiv 2004; 44: 145–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartley A. Changing role of the speed of processing construct in the cognitive psychology of human aging. In Birren JE, Schaie KW, Eds. Handbook of the psychology and aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 2006: 183–207.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Lobo A, Saz P, Marcos G et al. Revalidación y normalización del Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo (primera versión en castellano del Mini-Mental Status Examination) en la población general geriátrica [Re-validation of the Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo (first Spanish version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination) and populationbased norms in the elderly community]. Med Clin (Barc) 1999; 112: 767–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wechsler D. WAIS, Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Adultos. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service, 1981 (Spanish version: Pereda Marín S Test de Vocabulario Imágenes Peabody. Madrid: MEPSA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Unsworth N, Engle RW. On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychol Bull 2007; 136: 1038–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elosúa MR, Gutiérrez F, García Madruga JA, Luque JL, Gárate M. Adaptación española del “Reading span test” de Daneman y Carpenter [Daneman and Carpenter Reading Span Task, Spanish Adaptation]. Psicothema 1996; 8: 383–95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Turner ML, Engle RW. Is working memory capacity task dependent?. J Mem Lang 1989, 28: 127–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Case R, Kurland MD, Goldberg J. Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. J Exp Child Psychol 1982; 33: 386–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Testbattere zur aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) Freiburg: Psytest, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999; 6: 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pereiro AX, Juncos-Rabadán O, Rodríguez MS. Processing speed, inhibitory control and working memory: Three important factors in age-related cognitive decline. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2008; 66: 115–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salthouse TA. Structural models of the relations between age and measures of cognitive functioning. Intell 2001; 29: 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Loehlin JC. Latent variable models (4th. Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Rúa Xosé María Suárez Núñez, s/n. Campus vida, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

    David Facal, Onésimo Juncos-Rabadán & Arturo X. Pereiro

  2. Department of Social and Basic Psychology and Psychological Methodology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    María Soledad Rodríguez

Authors
  1. David Facal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Onésimo Juncos-Rabadán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Soledad Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arturo X. Pereiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Facal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Facal, D., Juncos-Rabadán, O., Rodríguez, M.S. et al. Tip-of-the-tongue in aging: influence of vocabulary, working memory and processing speed. Aging Clin Exp Res 24, 647–656 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3275/8586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3275/8586

Key words

Search

Navigation