Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 6–14 | Cite as

Delay of gratification in old age: assessment, age-related effects, and clinical implications

  • Reinhard DrobetzEmail author
  • Andreas Maercker
  • Simon Forstmeier
Review Article
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

Delay of gratification (DoG), the ability to reject immediately available smaller rewards in favor of later larger rewards, has been a topic of continuous research interest for almost 60 years. Although numerous studies have explored this construct and its effects on wellbeing, social behavior, cognitive abilities, and academic success in children, DoG studies in adulthood and old age are scarce. Instead, delay discounting (DD), that is, the degree to which individuals devalue delayed rewards, has been used in samples of adults and older individuals, and is of particular interest in clinical studies. Findings from DD research suggest that the preference for delayed rewards increases from childhood to early adulthood, and then decreases from middle age to old age. The main aim of this review is to elucidate the importance of DoG in adulthood and old age. First, the review explores the theoretical status of DoG by specifying the relationships and distinctions between DoG and related constructs. Second, it provides an overview of DoG measurements, from traditional to novel. Third, the effects of DoG on development and wellbeing are explored. Fourth, age-related differences in DoG are summarized. Lastly, the review closes with conclusions, clinical implications, and the outlook for possible further research directions.

Key words

Age-related differences assessment of delay of gratification delay discounting delay of gratification self-regulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mischel W. Processes in delay of gratification. In Berkowitz L, Ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1974: 249–92.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez MI. Delay of gratification in children. Science 1989; 244: 933–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF. Self-regulation failure: an overview. Psychol Inq 1996; 7: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freund AM, Baltes PB. Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: measurement by self-report and construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 82: 642–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazur JE. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In Commons ML, Mazur EJ, Nevin JA, Rachlin HI, Eds. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987: 55–73.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demetriou A. Organization and development of self-understanding and self-regulation. In Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, Eds. Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000: 209–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bembenutty H, Karabenick SA, Eds. Academic delay of gratification, future goals, and self-regulated learning. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karniol R, Miller DT. Why not wait? A cognitive model of self-imposed delay termination. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 45: 935–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P. Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: age differences in individual discounting functions. Behav Process 1999; 46: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ainslie GW. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull 1975; 82: 463–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rachlin H, Green F. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav 1972; 17: 15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reynolds B, de Wit H, Richards JB. Delay of gratification and delay discounting in rats. Behav Process 2002; 59: 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mischel W, Shoda Y, Peake PK. The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54: 687–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reynolds B, Schiffbauer R. Delay of gratification and delay discounting: a unifying feedback model of delay-related impulsive behavior. Psychol Rec 2005; 55: 439–60.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green L, Fry A, Myerson J. Discounting of delayed rewards: a lifespan comparison. Psychol Sci 1994; 5: 33–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hongwanishkul D, Happaney KR, Lee WS, Zelazo PD. Assessment of hot and cool executive function in young children: age-related changes and individual differences. Dev Neuropsychol 2005; 28: 617–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salthouse TA, Atkinson TM, Berish DE. Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. J Exp Psychol Gen 2003; 132: 566–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baumeister RF. The self. In Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, Eds. Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998: 680–740.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zelazo PD, Müller U. Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Goswami U, Ed. Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002: 445–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Metcalfe J, Mischel W. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychol Rev 1999; 106: 3–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zelazo PD, Qu L, Müller U. Hot and cool aspects of executive function: relations in early development. In Schneider W, Schumann-Hengsteler R, Sodian B, Eds. Young Children’s Cognitive Development: Interrelationships among Executive Functioning, Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Theory of Mind. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005: 71–93.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stuss DT, Benson DF. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silverman IW. Gender differences in delay of gratification: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles 2003; 49: 451–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wulfert E, Block JA, Santa Ana E, Rodriguez ML, Colsman M. Delay of gratification: impulsive choices and problem behaviors in early and late adolescence. J Pers 2002; 70: 533–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Knolle-Veentjer S, Huth V, Ferstl R, Aldenhoff JB, Hinze-Selch D. Delay of gratification and executive performance in individuals with schizophrenia: putative role for eating behavior and body weight regulation. J Psychiatr Res 2008; 42: 98–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Madden GJ, Petry NM, Badger GJ, Bickel WK. Impulsive and selfcontrol choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1997; 5: 256–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chapman GB. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1996; 22: 771–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Green L, Snyderman M. Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: toward a choice model of self control. J Exp Anal Behav 1980; 34: 135–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirby KN. Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J Exp Psychol Gen 1997; 126: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Herrnstein RJ. Rational choice theory — necessary but not sufficient. Am Psychol 1990; 45: 356–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Forstmeier S, Drobetz R, Maercker A. The Delay of Gratification Test for Adults (DoG-A): Validating a behavioral measure of self-motivation in a sample of older people. Motiv Emotion 2011; 35: 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Read D, Read NL. Time discounting over the lifespan. Organ Behav Hum 2004; 94: 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rogers AR. Evolution of time preference by natural selection. Am Econ Rev 1994; 84: 460–81.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harrison GW, Lau MI, Williams MB. Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: a field experiment. Am Econ Rev 2002; 92: 1606–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Green L, Myerson J, Lichtman D, Rosen S, Fry A. Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. Psychol Aging 1996; 11: 79–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sozou PD, Seymour RM. Augmented discounting: interaction between ageing and time-preference behaviour. Proc R Soc B 2003; 270: 1047–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trostel PA, Taylor GA. A theory of time preference. Econ Inq 2001; 39: 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boyd JN, Zimbardo PG. Time perspective, health, and risk taking. In Strathman A, Joireman J, Eds. Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, research, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005: 85–107.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Family relationships, social support and subjective life expectancy. J Health Soc Behav 2002; 43: 469–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77: 1271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST. Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am Psychol 1999; 54: 165–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Steinberg L, Graham S, O’Brien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, Banich M. Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Dev 2009; 80: 28–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cauffman E, Steinberg L. (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behav Sci Law 2000; 18: 741–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Greene AL. Future time perspective in adolescence — the present of things future revisited. J Youth Adolesc 1986; 15: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books, 1995.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ward WE, Perry TB, Woltz J, Doolin E. Delay of gratification among black college student leaders. J Black Psychol 1989; 15: 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bembenutty H. Sustaining motivation and academic goals: the invaluable role of academic delay of gratification. Learn Individ Differ 1999; 11: 233–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Eisenberger R, Adornetto M. Generalized self-control of delay and effort. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 1020–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Johnson MW, Bickel WK. Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 2002; 77: 129–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lagorio CH, Madden GJ. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behav Process 2005; 69: 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Madden GJ, Begotka AM, Raiff BR, Kastern LL. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2003; 11: 139–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kuhl J, Fuhrmann A. Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: the Volitional Components Inventory. In: Heckhausen J, Dweck CS, Eds. Motivation and Self-Regulation across the Life Span. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998: 15–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Neal DJ, Carey KB. A follow-up psychometric analysis of the self-regulation questionnaire. Psychol Addict Behav 2005; 19: 414–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tagney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 2004; 72: 271–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51: 768–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Reitan R. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indication of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958; 8: 271–6.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stroop J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 1935; 18: 643–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kirby KN, Godoy R, Reyes-García V, et al. Correlates of delay-discount rates: evidence from Tsimane’ Amerindians of the Bolivian rain forest. J Econ Psychol 2002; 23: 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosenbaum M, Ben-Ari Smira K. Cognitive and personality factors in the delay of gratification of hemodialysis patients. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 357–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Funder DC, Block J. The role of ego-control, ego-resiliency, and IQ in delay of gratification in adolescence. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989; 57: 1041–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Altman J, Bayer SA. Migration and distribution of two populations of hippocampal granule cell precursors during the perinatal and postnatal periods. J Comp Neurol 1990; 301: 365–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366: 2112–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annu Rev Psychol 2002; 53: 401–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Spinella M. Neurobehavioral correlates of impulsivity: evidence of prefrontal involvement. Int J Neurosci 2004; 114: 95–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cheung AM, Mitsis EM, Halperin JM. The relationship of behavioral inhibition to executive functions in young adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004; 26: 393–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zatz LM, Jernigan TL, Ahumada AJ. White matter changes in cerebral computed tomography relating to aging. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1982; 6: 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ropper, AH, Samuels, MA. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2009.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mittenberg W, Seidenberg M, O’Leary DS, DiGiulio DV. Changes in cerebral functioning associated with normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989; 11: 918–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lafleche G, Albert M. Executive function deficits in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 1995; 9: 313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Stern Y. Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2006; 20: 112–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Forstmeier S, Maercker A. Motivational reserve: lifetime motivational abilities contribute to cognitive and emotional health in old age. Psychol Aging 2008; 23: 886–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ray JJ, Najman JM. The generalizability of deferment of gratification. J Soc Psychol 1986; 126: 117–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Witt LA. Person situation effects and gender differences in the prediction of social responsibility. J Soc Psychol 1990; 130: 543–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bembenutty H, Karabenick SA. Academic delay of gratification. Learn Individ Differ 1998; 10: 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen 1999; 128: 78–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bonato DP, Boland FJ. Delay of gratification in obese children. Addict Behav 1983; 8: 71–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mischel W, Metzner R. Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1962; 64: 425–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Eigsti IM, Zayas V, Mischel W, et al. Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood. Psychol Sci 2006; 17: 478–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Scheres A, Lee A, Sumiya M. Temporal reward discounting and ADHD: task and symptom specific effects. J Neural Transm 2008; 115: 221–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Mischel W. Preference for delayed reinforcement and social responsibility. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1961; 62: 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Reynolds B. A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behav Pharmacol 2006; 17: 651–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    de Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol 2009; 14: 22–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Petry NM. Discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers: relationship to antisocial personality disorder. Psychopharmacology 2002; 162: 425–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Weller RE, Cook EW, Avsar KB, Cox JE. Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite 2008; 51: 563–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Heerey EA, Robinson BM, McMahon RP, Gold JM. Delay discounting in schizophrenia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2007; 12: 213–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dixon MR, Jacobs EA, Sanders S, et al. Impulsivity, self-control, and delay discounting in persons with acquired brain injury. Behavioral Interventions 2005; 20: 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rounds JS, Beck JG, Grant DM. Is the delay discounting paradigm useful in understanding social anxiety? Behav Res Ther 2007; 45: 729–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard Drobetz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas Maercker
    • 1
  • Simon Forstmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Psychopathology and Clinical InterventionUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations