Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal masses: A re-assessment with histological confirmation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of adrenal masses is a method currently indicated in lesions suspected of being extra-adrenal in origin; even though its diagnostic reliability has already been determined in many studies, few have used histological examination obtained after adrenalectomy for diagnostic confirmation. Aim: To analyze the diagnostic performance of adrenal FNA in subjects with an available histological confirmation. Subjects and methods: Fifty subjects (26 benign adrenal lesions, 9 primary malignant lesions, and 15 metastatic lesions) who had undergone ultrasound (US)-guided adrenal FNA and then adrenalectomy were re-analyzed retrospectively. Results: FNA guaranteed a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 100% in all subjects; after having divided the subjects into oncologic and non-oncologic groups, the sensitivity of the test in oncologic patients (100%) increased significantly compared to non-oncologic (57.1%) with no difference in specificity (100% in both groups). Considering also non-diagnostic samples in our analysis (no.=11; 22% of all samples studied), FNA correctly diagnosed malignancy only in 75% of the cases and benignancy only in 66.6%; however, even after including nondiagnostic samples, the percentage of correct malignancy diagnosis remained significantly higher in oncologic (93.3%) than in non-oncologic patients (44.4%) without significant statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the percentage of correct benignancy diagnosis (respectively 100% and 63.6%). Conclusions: Our study, based on histological confirmation, underlines the low discriminant value of US-guided adrenal FNA, though the method may have value in oncologic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mantero F, Arnaldi G. Investigation protocol: adrenal enlargement. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999, 50: 141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Terzolo M, Stigliano A, Chiodini I, et al; Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. AME Position Statement on adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol 2011, 164: 851–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grumbach MM, Biller BM, Braunstein GD, et al. Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (“incidentaloma”). Ann Intern Med 2003, 138: 424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nieman LK. Approach to the patient with an adrenal incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010, 95: 4106–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barzon L, Boscaro M. Diagnosis and management of adrenal incidentalomas. J Urol 2000, 163: 398–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fassnacht M, Kenn W, Allolio B. Adrenal tumors: how to establish malignancy? J Endocrinol Invest 2004, 27: 387–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Libè R, Dall’Asta C, Barbetta L, Baccarelli A, Beck-Peccoz P, Ambrosi B. Long-term follow-up study of patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2002, 147: 489–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harisinghani MG, Maher MM, Hahn PF, et al. Predictive value of benign percutaneous adrenal biopsies in oncology patients. Clin Radiol 2002, 57: 898–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cofield KR 3rd, Cantley LK, Geisinger KR, Zagoria RJ, Perrier ND. Adrenocortical carcinoma arising from a long-standing adrenal mass. Mayo Clin Proc 2005, 80: 264–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorin-Savouré A, Tissier-Rible F, Guignat L, et al. Collision/composite tumors of the adrenal gland: a pitfall of scintigraphy imaging and hormone assays in the detection of adrenal metastasis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005, 90: 4924–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fassina AS, Borsato S, Fedeli U. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of adrenal masses. Cytopathology 2000, 11: 302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Favia G, Lumachi F, Basso S, D’Amico DF. Management of incidentally discovered adrenal masses and risk of malignancy. Surgery 2000, 128: 918–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lumachi F, Borsato S, Brandes AA, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal masses in noncancer patients: clinicoradiologic and histologic correlations in functioning and nonfunctioning tumors. Cancer 2001, 93: 323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lumachi F, Borsato S, Tregnaghi A, et al. CT-scan, MRI and image-guided FNA cytology of incidental adrenal masses. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003, 29: 689–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lumachi F, Borsato S, Tregnaghi A, et al. High risk of malignancy in patients with incidentally discovered adrenal masses: accuracy of adrenal imaging and image-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Tumori 2007, 93: 269–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quayle FJ, Spitler JA, Pierce RA, Lairmore TC, Moley JF, Brunt LM. Needle biopsy of incidentally discovered adrenal masses is rarely informative and potentially hazardous. Surgery 2007, 142: 497–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Statist 1979, 6: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barry HC, Ebell MH. Test characteristics and decision rules. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1997, 26: 45–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ 1997, 315: 540–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glantz SA. Primer of biostatistics. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. 2005, 242–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mazzaglia PJ, Monchik JM. Limited value of adrenal biopsy in the evaluation of adrenal neoplasm: a decade of experience. Arch Surg 2009, 144: 465–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreira SG Jr, Pow-Sang JM. Evaluation and management of adrenal masses. Cancer Control 2002, 9: 326–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsvetov G, Shimon I, Benbassat C. Adrenal incidentaloma: clinical characteristics and comparison between patients with and without extraadrenal malignancy. J Endocrinol Invest 2007, 30: 647–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saeger W, Fassnacht M, Chita R, et al. High diagnostic accuracy of adrenal core biopsy: results of the German and Austrian adrenal network multicenter trial in 220 consecutive patients. Hum Pathol 2003, 34: 180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dusenbery D, Dekker A. Needle biopsy of the adrenal gland: retrospective review of 54 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1996, 14: 126–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Welch TJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Stephens DH, Johnson CM, Swensen SJ. Percutaneous adrenal biopsy: review of a 10-year experience. Radiology 1994, 193: 341–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yeh HC, Mitty HA, Rose J, Wolf BS, Gabrilove JL. Ultrasonography of adrenal masses: unusual manifestations. Radiology 1978, 127: 475–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakamura K, Sato Y, Nakata H. Computed tomography of adrenal metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma. Report of four cases. Acta Radiol 1989, 30: 550–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lloyd RV. Adrenal cortical tumors, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Mod Pathol 2011, 24(Suppl 2): S58–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Newhouse JH, Heffess CS, Wagner BJ, Imray TJ, Adair CF, Davidson AJ. Large degenerated adrenal adenomas: radiologicpathologic correlation. Radiology 1999, 210: 385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bernardino ME, Walther MM, Phillips VM, et al. CT-guided adrenal biopsy: accuracy, safety, and indications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985, 144: 67–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Agustín P, López-Ríos F, Alberti N, Pérez-Barrios A. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: a ten-year experience. Diagn Cytopathol 1999, 21: 92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paulsen SD, Nghiem HV, Korobkin M, Caoili EM, Higgins EJ. Changing role of imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of adrenal masses: evaluation of 50 adrenal biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004, 182: 1033–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kocijancic K, Kocijancic I, Guna F. Role of sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of adrenal masses in patients with lung cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 2004, 32: 12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Arnaldi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tirabassi, G., Kola, B., Ferretti, M. et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of adrenal masses: A re-assessment with histological confirmation. J Endocrinol Invest 35, 590–594 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3275/8010

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3275/8010

Key-words

Navigation