Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 74–78 | Cite as

Comparison of prognostic value of two kinds of severity scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction of elderly patients with acute kidney injury

  • Yu Gong
  • Huaxi Xu
  • Zhongye Xu
  • Fen Zhang
  • Chuanming Hao
  • Yong Gu
  • Shanyan Lin
  • Feng DingEmail author
Original Article


Background and aims: Outcome prediction is important in clinical practice. Despite significant improvements in therapeutics, the mortality associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in elderly patients remains high. Several severity scoring systems have been used in hospital mortality prediction of patients, but little is known of their significance in elderly patients with AKI. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of version II of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and Acute Tubular Necrosis Individual Severity Index (ATN-ISI) on predicting the hospital mortality of elderly patients with AKI. Methods: A consecutive sample of 99 elderly patients (age≥65) with AKI in a university hospital was enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess the discriminative power for hospital mortality prediction. The McNemar and Kappa tests were also applied. Results: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of APACHE II and ATN-ISI were 0.895 (95% CI 0.829–0.960) and 0.858 (95% CI 0.783–0.934), respectively. The sensitivity of the hospital mortality prediction of the two scoring systems was 87.72% and 89.47%, respectively, and the specificity of hospital mortality prediction was 76.19% and 66.67%, respectively. No significant differences were found between the predicted and real mortality rates. Conclusions: APACHE II and ATN-ISI scoring systems can predict the hospital mortality of elderly AKI patients. However, APACHE II performs better than ATN-ISI.

Key words

Acute kidney injury mortality prediction model receiver operating characteristic curve 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 3365–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liano F, Gallego A, Pascual J et al. Prognosis of acute tubular necrosis: An extended prospectively contrasted study. Nephron 1993; 63: 21–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandes NM, Pinto Pdos S, Lacet TB et al. [APACHE II and ATN-ISS in acute renal failure (ARF) in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU]. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2009; 55: 434–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahlstrom A, Kuitunen A, Peltonen S et al. Comparison of 2 acute renal failure severity scores to general scoring systems in the critically ill. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: 262–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lima EQ, Dirce MT, Castro I, Yu L. Mortality risk factors and validation of severity scoring systems in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Ren Fail 2005; 27: 547–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katsaragakis S, Papadimitropoulos K, Antonakis P, Strergiopoulos S, Konstadoulakis MM, Androulakis G. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 426–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure — definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the 2nd international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care 2004; 8: R204–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Ronco C. Definition and classification of acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract 2008; 109: c182–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brivet FG, Kleinknecht DJ, Loirat P, Landais PJ. Acute renal failure in intensive care units — causes, outcome, and prognostic factors of hospital mortality; a prospective, multicenter study. French Study Group on Acute Renal Failure. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 192–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parker RA, Himmelfarb J, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Chandran P, Wingard RL, Hakim RM. Prognosis of patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis: results of a multicenter study. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32: 432–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen YC, Hsu HH, Chen CY, Fang JT, Huang CC. Integration of APACHE II and III scoring systems in extremely high risk patients with acute renal failure treated by dialysis. Ren Fail 2002; 24: 285–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fiaccadori E, Maggiore U, Lombardi M, Leonardi S, Rotelli C, Borghetti A. Predicting patient outcome from acute renal failure comparing three general severity of illness scoring systems. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 283–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Varricatt VP, Rau NR, Attur RP, Baig WW. Validation of Liano score in acute renal failure: a prospective study in Indian patients. Clin Exp Nephrol 2009; 13: 33–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santacruz F, Barreto S, Mayor MM, Cabrera W, Breuer N. Mortality in elderly patients with acute renal failure. Ren Fail 1996; 18: 601–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Gong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huaxi Xu
    • 3
  • Zhongye Xu
    • 1
  • Fen Zhang
    • 4
  • Chuanming Hao
    • 1
  • Yong Gu
    • 1
  • Shanyan Lin
    • 1
  • Feng Ding
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Nephrology, Huashan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Division of Nephrology, Affiliated Renmin HospitalJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  3. 3.School of Medical Science and Laboratory MedicineJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  4. 4.Division of Statistics, College of Public HealthFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations