Skip to main content
Log in

Tuning a PID Controller in a System with a Delayed Second-Order Object

  • Published:
Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

The possibility of using different methods of tuning a proportional-integral-derivative controller in a system with a transport-delayed second-order object is considered. The transfer function of the object and its parameters are determined by the experimentally obtained transient response, the quality indicators of the transient response are evaluated, and the research problem is formulated. Since the control object has a significant delay, we plan to explore several methods of tuning a PID controller in order to select the most appropriate method. The Ziegler–Nichols method (frequency method), Chien–Hrones–Reswick method, Kuhn’s method (fast tuning), Skogestad’s method, and numerical optimization method with different cost functions are studied. The synthesized systems are simulated using MATLAB Simulink and VisSim integrated software. Graphs of transient responses obtained using different methods are compared. It is shown that the numerical optimization method makes it possible to provide the best quality of the transient response at the output of a closed system among the studied methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. A. Zhmud’, Closed-Loop Automatic Control Systems: Textbook (Yurait, Novosibirsk, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. S. Karimov, ‘‘Synthesis of automatic control systems of multiconnected objects with delays based on systems embedding technology,’’ Extended Abstract of Candidate’s Dissertation in Engineering (Ufa, 2013).

  3. O. S. Vadutov, ‘‘Synthesis of PID controller in systems with delay by method of conditional optimization with restrictions to pole placement,’’ Izv. Tomskogo Politekh. Univ. Inf. Tekhnol. 325 (5), 16–22 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Besekerskii and E. P. Popov, Theory of Automatic Control Systems, 4th ed. (Professiya, St. Petersburg, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Sanz, P. Garcia, and P. Albertos, ‘‘Enhanced disturbance rejection for a predictor–based control of LTI systems with input delay,’’ Automatica 72, 205–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.05.019

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Furtat, E. Fridman, and A. Fradkov, ‘‘Disturbance compensation with finite spectrum assignment for plants with input delay,’’ IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 63, 298–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2017.2732279

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Zuo, Z. Lin, and Zh. Ding, ‘‘Truncated prediction output feedback control of a class of Lipschitz nonlinear systems with input delay,’’ IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs 63, 788–792 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2016.2531053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Shi, X. Liu, H. Zhu, Sh. Zhong, Y. Zeng, and Ch. Yin, ‘‘Novel delay-dependent master-slave synchronization criteria of chaotic Lur’e systems with time-varying-delay feedback control,’’ Appl. Math. Comput. 282, 137–154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.062

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. A. Zhmud, L. V. Dimitrov, and J. Nosek, Numerical Optimization of Regulators for Automatic Control Systems: Textbook for Higher Education (Novosibirskii Gos. Tekh. Univ., Novosibirsk, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Yu. Vorob’ev and G. V. Sablina, ‘‘Calculation and optimization of parameters of a discrete PID controller by Ziegler–Nichols method,’’ Avtom. Programm. Inzheneriya, No. 1, 9–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. O. Demin and G. V. Sablina, ‘‘Research of methods for setting parameters of the PID controller,’’ Avtom. Programm. Inzheneriya, No. 1, 174–180 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Kurganov and A. V. Tsavnin, ‘‘Controlling an object with delay,’’ Avtom. Programm. Inzheneriya, No. 2, 9–13 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. V. Miller and G. V. Sablina, ‘‘Calculation of PID-controller parameters,’’ Avtom. Programm. Inzheneriya, No. 1, 148–153 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. V. Stel’mashchuk, ‘‘Tuning of PID controller on the reaction curve of an object with self-regulation for maximum speed with given overshoot,’’ Vestn. Tikhookean. Gos. Univ., No. 2, 81–90 (2013).

  15. A. A. Sidorova, ‘‘Selecting the efficient method for PID controller tuning,’’ in Proc. 15th Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. of Students, Doctoral Students, and Young Scientists Youth and Modern Information Technologies, Tomsk, 2017, Ed. by S. S. Mikhalevich, D. M. Son’kin, M. A. Ivanova, M. S. Sukhodoev, V. S. Sherstnev, O. G. Berestneva, and A. A. Zakharova (Tomskii Politekh. Univ., Tomsk, 2017), pp. 175–176.

  16. V. A. Zhmud, A. S. Vostrikov, A. Yu. Ivoilov, and G. V. Sablina, ‘‘Synthesis of robust PID controllers by double optimization method,’’ Mekhatronika, Avtom., Upr. 21 (2), 67–74 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.67-73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. A. Zhmud, L. Dimitrov, G. Sablina, H. Roth, Ja. Nosek, and W. Hardt, ‘‘On the expediency and possibilities of approximating a pure delay link,’’ Inf. Avtom. 21 (1), 41–67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15622/ia.2022.21.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. V. Sablina or V. A. Markova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Obrezanova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sablina, G.V., Markova, V.A. Tuning a PID Controller in a System with a Delayed Second-Order Object. Optoelectron.Instrument.Proc. 58, 410–417 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S8756699022040112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S8756699022040112

Keywords:

Navigation