Skip to main content
Log in

Algorithms of constructing a neural network model for a dynamic object of control and adjustment of PID controller parameters

  • Flight Dynamics and Control of Flight Vehicles
  • Published:
Russian Aeronautics (Iz VUZ) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents an algorithm for constructing a neural network model for a dynamic object of control based on the data sample obtained as a result of the object operation. The algorithm being considered applies a neural network approach and a genetic algorithm. An algorithm is presented for determining a domain of possible values for a proportional-integral-derivative controller (PID controller) based on application created neural network model of the controlled object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rotach, V.Ya., Controller Setting by Modified Ziegler-Nichols Method, Promyshlennye ASU i Kontrollery, 2008, no. 2, pp. 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ziegler, J.G. and Nichols, N.B., Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers, Trans. of the ASME, 1942, vol. 64, pp. 759–768.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Åström, K. J and Hägglund, T, Advanced PID Control, ISA-The Instrumentation Systems and Automation Society, Research Tringle Park, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Omatu, S., Khalid, M., and Yusof, R., Neuro-Control and Its Applications, London: Springer, 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Akhyar, S. and Omatu, S., Self-Tuning PID Control by Neural-Networks, Proc. of 1993 Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, Nagoya, 1993, pp. 2749–2752.

  6. Dolezel, P. and Mares, J., Self-Tuning PID Control Using Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Networks, ASR 2009 Instruments and Control, 2009, pp. 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fujinaka, T., Kishida, Y., Yoshilka, M., and Omatu, S., Stabilization of Double Inverted Pendulum with Self-Tuning Neuro-PID, Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, 2000, pp. 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herrero, J. M., Blasco, X., Martinez, M., and Salcedo, J.V., Optimal PID Tuning with Genetic Algorithms for Nonlinear Process Models, 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, 2002, pp. 656–656.

  9. Kanthalakshmi, S. and Manikandan, V., Genetic Algorithm Based Self Tuning Regulator, Int. J. of Engineering Science and Technology, 2010, no. 2, pp. 7719–7728.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kawafuku, R., Sasaki, M., and Kato, S., Self-Tuning PID Control of a Flexible Micro-Actuator Using Neural Networks, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998, pp. 3067–3072.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, D.H. and Cho, J.H., A Biologically Inspired Intelligent PID Controller Adjustment for AVR Systems, Int. J. of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2006, pp. 624–636.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., Xie, J.-Y., and Wu, Z.-M., Design of Disturbance Rejection PID Controllers for Time Delay System Based on Genetic Algorithms, Neural Networks and Brain, 2005, pp. 876–880.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pirabakaran, K. and Becerra, V. M., PID Autotuning using Neural Networks and Model Reference Adaptive Control, 15th Triennial IFAC World Congress, Spain, 2002, pp. 726–726.

  14. Popov, A., Farag, A., and Werner, H., Tuning of a PID Controller Using a Multi-objective Optimization Technique Applied to a Neutralization Plant, 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2005, pp. 7139–7143.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Swiniarski, R.W., Neural Network Based Self-Tuning PID Controller with Fourier Transformation of Temporal Patterns, Industrial Electronics Society, 1990, pp. 1127–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsaregorodtseva, E.D., Constructing of Neural Network Emulator for Control Object, Nauchno-Tekhnicheskie Vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo Gos. Politekh. Univ., 2011, no. 3, pp. 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Osovskii, S., Neironnye seti dlya obrabotki informatsii (Neural Networks for Data Processing), Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rutkovskaya, D., Pilin’skii, M., and Rutkovskii, L., Neironnye seti, geneticheskie algoritmy i nechetkie sistemy (Neural Networks, Genetic Algorithms, and Fuzzy Systems), Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya-Telekom, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tarkhov, D.A., Neironnye seti. Modeli i algoritmy (Neural Networks. Models and Algorithms), Moscow: Radiotekhnika, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Emaletdinova, L.Yu. and Tsaregorodtseva, E.D., Adaptive Method for PID Controller Gain Calculation of Feedback Automatic Control System, Sistemy Upravleniya i Informatsionnye Tekhnologii, 2010, no. 4, pp. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © L.Yu. Emaletdinova, E.D. Tsaregorodtseva, 2013, published in Izvestiya VUZ. Aviatsionnaya Tekhnika, 2013, No. 3, pp. 27–33.

About this article

Cite this article

Emaletdinova, L.Y., Tsaregorodtseva, E.D. Algorithms of constructing a neural network model for a dynamic object of control and adjustment of PID controller parameters. Russ. Aeronaut. 56, 247–256 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068799813030069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068799813030069

Keywords

Navigation