Abstract
Definitions of risk from current Russian standards on quality management and risk management are considered. Revised definitions are offered. Careful scrutiny of various approaches to risk assessment permits conclusions regarding the assessment approaches in the most common methods of risk analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Kachalov, V.A., “Risks” and “Opportunities” in ISO 9001:2015: Separately or together? Metody Menedzhmenta Kachestva, 2016, nos. 7–8. https://www.qcert.ru/information/publications/docs/riski-i-vozmozhnosti-iso-9001-2015/
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. FMEA Handbook, Michigan: AIAG, 2019, 1st ed.
Panyukov, D.I., Kozlovskii, V.N., Aidarov, D.V., and Shakurskii, M.V., FMEA risk analysis on the basis of action priorities, Russ. Eng. Res., 2022, vol. 42, pp. 1077–1080. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X22100227
Funding
Financial support was provided by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education (grant FSSE-2023-0003) as part of state funding for Samara State Technical University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by B. Gilbert
About this article
Cite this article
Panyukov, D.I., Kozlovskii, V.N., Aidarov, D.V. et al. Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Russ. Engin. Res. 43, 1011–1013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X23080208
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X23080208