Abstract
Errors in the selection of management practices at an enterprise confronting the prospect of crisis are considered: specifically, the adoption of standard management during a crisis; or crisis management when no crisis exists. By analogy with classical approaches in probability theory and operational research, such errors are interpreted as errors of the first and second kind. The basic problems arising from such errors are identified, and some measures are proposed for reducing their likelihood. The results should prove useful to managers at industrial enterprises, consulting firms, developers of management systems, and the faculty at universities and staff-training centers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dmitriev, O.N., Sistemnyi analiz v upravlenii (System Analysis in Management), Moscow: Dobroe Slovo, 2005.
Zolotova, V.A., The typology of crises at Russian industrial enterprises, Vopr. Sovrem. Nauki Prakt., 2017, no. 2 (33), pp. 62–70.
Zolotova, V.A., Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskii mekhanizm formiroavniya programmy antikrizisnogo upravleniya predpriyatiem promyshlennosti Rossii (The Organizational and Economic Mechanism of Development of the Program of Anti-Crisis Management of the Enterprise in Russian Industry), Moscow: Pero, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.A. Zolotova, O.N. Dmitriev, 2017, published in STIN, 2017, No. 10, pp. 5–9.
About this article
Cite this article
Zolotova, V.A., Dmitriev, O.N. Conceptual Interpretation of First and Second Kinds of Errors at Management Mode Selection under Conditions of Its Possible Crisis State. Russ. Engin. Res. 38, 291–294 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X1804024X
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X1804024X