Abstract
A new method is proposed for empirical modeling. In this approach, the empirical model is improved by the introduction of data from theoretical modeling and experiment design. Comparison of the traditional empirical model and the proposed model shows that the latter is characterized by higher precision, over large ranges of the relevant factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bokov, V.B., First-order response surface modeling of curvilinear relationships, Int. J. Exp. Des. Process Optim., 2010, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 327–347.
Ryan, T.P., Modern Engineering Statistics, New York: Wiley, 2007.
Fischer, H.L. and Elrod, J.T., Surface finish as a function of tool geometry and feed: a theoretical approach, Microtechnic, 1971, vol. 25, pp. 175–178.
Groover, M.P., Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, New York: Wiley, 2007.
Bokov, V.B., Creation of empiric model of rough surface after final turning by adequacy criteria, Vestn. Mashinostr., 2016, no. 1, pp. 73–78.
Draper, N.R. and Smith, H., Applied Regression Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1998.
Searle, S.R., Linear Models, New York: Wiley, 1971.
NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, Gaithersburg: Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 2012. http://wwwitlnistgov/div898/handbook/pmd/section4/ pmd441htm.
Seber, G.A.F., Linear Regression Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.B. Bokov, 2016, published in Vestnik Mashinostroeniya, 2016, No. 4, pp. 72–76.
About this article
Cite this article
Bokov, V.B. Surface roughness in final turning: Development of an adequate empirical model. Russ. Engin. Res. 36, 559–564 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X16070042
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X16070042