Abstract
Presented are the results of studies dealing with the analysis of discrepancies in the data on total ozone measurements carried out using different instruments. The results of measurements with ground-based spectral (UV and visible) and filter instruments and spaceborne nadir scanning instruments are used as initial data. As a result of the analysis of relative systematic and random discrepancies, it is concluded that the data of filter instruments are of insufficient accuracy for diagnosing total ozone values. The analysis of linear trends revealed the presence of considerable differences in the data series obtained by spectral instruments. It is concluded that there is every reason to hope for obtaining the most homogeneous measurement data in Russia using the instruments operating in the Chappuis band.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. J. Hudson, Statistics for Physicists (Mir, Moscow, 1967) [Transl. from English].
D. Balis et al., “Ten Years of GOME/ERS2 Total Ozone Data—The New GOME Data Processor (GDP) Version 4: 2. Ground-based Validation and Comparisons with TOMS V7/V8,” J. Geophys. Res., 112 (2007).
D. Balis, M. Kroon, M. E. Koukouli, et al., “Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument Total Ozone Column Measurements Using Brewer and Dobson Spectrophotometer Ground-based Observations,” J. Geophys. Res., 112 (2007).
R. D. Bojkov, C. Mateer, and A. Hanson, “Comparison of Ground-based and Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer Measurements Used in Assessing the Performance of the Global Ozone Observing System,” J. Geophys. Res., 93 (1988).
K. Bramstedt, J. Gleason, D. Loyola, et al., “Comparison of Total Ozone from the Satellite Instruments GOME and TOMS with Measurements from the Dobson Network 1996–2000,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3 (2003).
V. E. Fioletov, J. B. Kerr, E. W. Hare, et al., “An Assessment of the World Ground-based Total Ozone Network Performance from the Comparison with Satellite Data,” J. Geophys. Res., 104 (1999).
V. E. Fioletov, G. Labow, R. Evans, et al., “Performance of Ground-based Total Ozone Network Assessed Using Satellite Data. 2008,” J. Geophys. Res., 113 (2008).
A. J. Fleig, P. K. Bhartia, C. G. Wellemeyer, and D. S. Silberstein, “An Assessment of the Long-term Drift in SBUV Total Ozone Data, Based on Comparison with the Dobson Network,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 13 (1986).
R. D. McPeters and G. J. Labow, “An Assessment of the Acuracy of 14.5 Years of Nimbus 7 TOMS Version 7 Ozone Data by Comparison with the Dobson Network,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 23 (1996).
M. Weber, L. N. Lamsal, M. Coldewey-Egbers, et al., “Pole-to-pole Validation of GOME WFDOAS Total Ozone with Groundbased Data,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5 (2005).
World Meteorological Organization Handbook for Ozone Data Reevaluation, WMO Ozone Rep. No. 29 (WMO, Geneva, 1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Yu.A. Izrael, L.M. Belokrinitskaya, I.V. Dvoretskaya, V.M. Dorokhov, K.A. Ivanov, G.M. Kruchenitskii, D.V. Shepelev, T.A. Yusipov, 2014, published in Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya, 2014, No. 6, pp. 85–98.
About this article
Cite this article
Izrael, Y.A., Belokrinitskaya, L.M., Dvoretskaya, I.V. et al. Comparison of ground-based and satellite measurements of total ozone. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 39, 420–430 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373914060090
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373914060090