Skip to main content
Log in

On the taboo on researching in the field of global climate geoengineering

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The material presented by Meleshko et al., in the article “Is Aerosol Scattering in the Stratosphere a Safety Technology Preventing Global Climate Warming?” published in this number of the journal is under critical review. The references to the opinions of many prestigious foreign scientists are cited not in a quite correct way. Out of a huge data massif of observations the names of those scientists are selected whose viewpoints agree with the points of view of the authors of the paper considered. A conclusion is made that the paper under consideration does not contain scientific information for taking responsible solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. A. Izrael, “Effective Maintenance of Climate at the Present Level-a Primary Goal to Solve the Climate Problem,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 10 (2005) [Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 10, (2005)].

  2. I. L. Karol, “Radioactive Aerosol Sizes and Their Transport in the Troposphere and Stratosphere,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 1 (1973) [Sov. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 1 (1973)].

  3. V. P. Meleshko, V. M. Kattsov, and I. L. Karol, “Is Aerosol Scattering in the Stratosphere a Safety Technology Preventing Global Climate Warming?” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 7 (2010) [Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 7, 35 (2010)].

  4. K. Caldeira, “Geoengineering: Perhaps Palliative Medicine,” Geotimes, July 2008 (2008), http://www.geotimes.org.

  5. R. J. Cicerone, “Geoengineering: Encouraging Research and Overseeing Implementation,” Climatic Change, 77 (2006).

  6. P. J. Crutzen, “Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injection: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?” Climatic Change, 77 (2006).

  7. J. T. Kiehl, “Geoengineering Climate Change: Treating the Symptom over the Cause?” Climatic Change, 77 (2006).

  8. O. Morton, “Climate Change: Is It What It Takes to Save the World?” Nature, 447 (2007).

  9. N. Stern, The Economics of Climatic Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, Great Britain Treasury, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Teller, R. Hyde, M. Ishikawa, et al., “Active Climate Stabilization: Presently-Feasible Albedo-Control Approaches to Prevention of Both Types of Climate Change. Symposium on Macro-Engineering Options for Climate Change Management and Mitigation,” Isaac Newton Institute, Cambridge, January 7–9, 2004.

  11. WMO, 2007. WMO (World Meteorological Organization), Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project (Geneva, Switzerland, Report No. 5).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.G. Ryaboshapko, 2010, published in Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya, 2010, No. 7, pp. 99–103.

About this article

Cite this article

Ryaboshapko, A.G. On the taboo on researching in the field of global climate geoengineering. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 35, 500–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373910070101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373910070101

Keywords

Navigation