Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological and Biochemical Features of Drought Resistance of Potato Plants

  • CROP PRODUCTION, PLANT PROTECTION, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to identify the relationship between drought resistance indicators and the yield of potato plants under unfavorable conditions. A xeromorphic leaf structure is considered to be a diagnostic sign of plant drought resistance. The objects of the study were 24 potato varieties. Planting of seeds, preplanting tillage, harvesting, and crop recording were carried out in the period of 2020–2022 on the territory of the Samara Research Institute of Agriculture (branch of the Samara Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences). Growing conditions for 2021 and 2022 were characterized by elevated temperatures and insufficient moisture. The number and size of stomata per unit leaf area were chosen as the criterion for xeromorphism. The studied varieties were divided into two groups (n = 12 each) according to the number of stomata. In the first group, the average number of stomata was 26 000 pcs./cm2 of leaf, and that in the second group was 35 000 pcs. (F = 41, p = 0.03). More developed structural features of xeromorphism and the accumulation of certain types of metabolites in the second group of varieties led to a 1.6 times greater yield than in the first less xeromorphic group (F = 9, p = 0.004). The second group was characterized by a large number of mesophyll cells per unit leaf area (584 000 pcs./cm2 vs. 557 000 pcs.), high content of phospholipids (36 mg/g dry weight vs. 31 mg/g), dry weight (0.19 vs. 0.17 g/g wet weight), and the ratio of membrane lipids to membrane proteins (1.4 vs. 1.2). In the less xeromorphic group of plants, the level of oxidative stress, assessed by LPO products, was 0.050 μM/g fresh weight and was 12% higher than in the more xeromorphic group (F = 6, p = 0.08). The revealed positive correlation between yield and xeromorphic genotypes indicates the prospects of using this criterion in potato breeding or creating a variety model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. Zarzynska, K., Boguszewska-Mankowska, D., and Nosalewicz, A., Differences in size and architecture of the potato cultivars root system and their tolerance to drought stress, Plant Soil Environ., 2017, vol. 63, pp. 159–164. https://doi.org/10.17221/4/2017‑PES

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schafleitner, R., Gutierrez, R., Espino, R., et al., Field screening for variation of drought tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by agronomical, physiological and genetic analysis, Potato Res., 2007, vol. 50, pp. 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540‑007‑9030‑9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gervais, T., Creelman, A., Li, X.-Q., et al., Potato response to drought stress: Physiological and growth basis, Front. Plant Sci., 2021, vol. 12, p. 698060. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021698060/full. Cited April 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.698060

  4. Kagermazov, A.M. and Khachidogov, A.V., Mechanisms of drought resistance of maize, Innovats. Prodovol. Bezop., 2018, no. 2, pp. 62–65. https://doi.org/10.31677/2311‑0651‑2018‑0‑2‑62‑65

  5. Raymundo, R., Asseng, S., Robertson, R., et al., Climate change impact on global potato production, Eur. J. Agron., 2018, vol. 100, pp. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barriopedro, D., Fischer, E.M., Luterbacher, J., et al., The hot summer of 2010: redrawing the temperature record map of Europe, Science, 2011, vol. 332, no. 6026, pp. 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akin’shina, N.G., Duschanova, G.M., Azizov, A.A., et al., Xeromorphic features of the leaves of Liriodendron tulipifera L. (Magnoliaceae) in the arid climate of Central Asia, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 16: Biol., 2020, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 51–257.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Panfilova, O.V. and Golyaeva, O.D., Physiological features of red currant varieties and selected seedling adaptation to drought and high temperature, S-kh. Biol., 2017, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2017.5.1056rus

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alabushev, A.V., Ionova, E.V., Likhovidova, V.A., et al., Estimation of drought resistance of winter common wheat under conditions of model drought, Zemledelie, 2019, no. 7, pp. 35–37. https://doi.org/10.31367/2079‑8725‑2018‑59‑5‑29‑31

  10. Rozentsvet, O.A., Bogdanova, E.S., Nesterov, V.N., et al., Productivity and dynamics of morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of potatoes in arid climate, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2021, vol. 497, pp. 65–68. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686738921020232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozentsvet, O., Bogdanova, E., Nesterov, V., et al., Physiological and biochemical parameters of leaves for evaluation of the potato yield, Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, p. 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12060757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakunov, A.L., Dmitrieva, N.N., Rubtsov, S.L., et al., Morpho-physiological determinants of potato yield formations under the conditions of moisture deficiency and high temperatures, Biol. Bull., 2023, vol. 50, pp. 457–466. Cited April 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359022700042

  13. Bakunov, A.L., Dmitrieva, N.N., S.L., Rubtsov, et al., Factors that ensured the formation of potato yields when cultivated on ridges, Ross. S-kh. Nauka, 2023, no. 2, pp. 25–29. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500262723020060

  14. Ivanova, L.A., Yudina, P.K., Ronzhina, D.A., et al., Quantitative mesophyll parameters rather than wholeleaf traits predict response of C3 steppe plants to aridity, New Phytol., 2018, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bezrukova, M.V., Kudoyaroav, G.R., Lubyanova, A.R., et al., Influence of 24-Epibrassinolide on Water Exchange of Wheat Varieties Various in Dry Resistance under Osmotic Stress, Fiziol. Rast., 2021, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443721010040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bogdanova, E., Ivanova, L., Yudina, P., et al., Seasonal dynamics of functional parameters of wintergreen steppe relict Globularia punctate Lapeyr, Flora, 2022, vol. 289, p. 152037. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0367253022000342. Cited April 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2022.152037

  17. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, N.J., et al., Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem., 1951, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021‑9258(19)52451‑6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. TerBraak, C.J.F., Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis, Ecology, 1986, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malyukova, L.S., Nechaeva, T.L., Zubova, M.Yu., et al., Physiological and biochemical characterization of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) microshoots in vitro: the norm, osmotic stress, and effects of calcium, S-kh. Biol., 2020, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 970–980. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2020.5.970rus

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. deCarvalho, M.H.C., Drought stress and reactive oxygen species, Plant Signaling Behav., 2008, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 156–165. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.3.5536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Plich, J., Boguszewska-Mankowska, D., and Marczewski, W., Relations between photosynthetic parameters and drought-induced tuber yield decrease in Katahdin-derived potato cultivars, Potato Res., 2020, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540‑020‑09451‑3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhukov, A.V., On qualitative composition of membrane lipids in plant cells, Fiziol. Rast., 2021, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 206–224. https://doi.org/10.31857/S001533032101022X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashraf, M. and Foolad, M.R., Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance, Environ. Exp. Bot., 2007, vol. 59, pp. 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 23-26-10020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Rozentsvet.

Ethics declarations

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This work does not contain any studies involving human and animal subjects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Mittova

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rozentsvet, O.A., Bogdanova, E.S., Rubtsov, S.L. et al. Physiological and Biochemical Features of Drought Resistance of Potato Plants. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 50, 1–6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367424010099

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367424010099

Keywords:

Navigation