Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing Wheat Productivity with an Adequate Population of Preferred Varieties in Ethiopia

  • PLANT GROWING, PLANT PROTECTION AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

A field experiment consisting of three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties (Local, Danphy, and Picaflora) and four-row spacings (15, 20, 25 and 30 cm) in 2017–2018 at Gondar Zuria district of Ethiopia was laid out with 3 replications in a factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with the objective to analyze the reaction between yield as well as yield components of wheat of three wheat varieties to varying inter-row spacings. Results showed that the variations in straw yield, days to heading and seedling emergence, biomass yield, plant height, days to maturity as well as harvest index were highly significant due to different varieties. While, significant differences were noted for 1000-grain weight, and the interaction effect of variety, as well as row spacing was also found to be significant. The effects of varieties were non-significant for grains per spike, grain yield, number of tillers per plant, and spike length. Significant differences were noted for a number of grains per spike and grain yield. The finding showed that grain yield progressively decreased as row spacing increased with 1000-grain weight (38.94 g), number of grains per spike (49.83), and grain yield (4590.3 kg ha–1) were reported in the variety Danphy at 20 cm inter-row spacing whereas, minimum grain yield (4041.7 kg ha–1) was noted in Picaflora variety. Hence, the sowing of variety Danphy at 20 cm inter-row spacing may be suggested for higher grain yield in the study area of Ethiopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

REFERENCES

  1. Ali, M., Ali, L., Sattar, M., and Ali, M.A., Improvement in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield by manipulating seed rate and row spacing in Vehari zone, J. Animal Plant Sci., 2010, vol. 20, pp. 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali, S., Ibin-i Zamir, M.S., Farid, M., Farooq, M.A., Rizwan, M., Ahmad, R., and Hannan, F., Growth and yield response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to tillage and row spacing in maize-wheat cropping system in semi-arid region, Eurasian J. Soil Sci., 2016. vol. 5. pp. 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ansari, M.A., Meman, H.R., Tunio, S.D., and Keerio, S.A., Effect of planting pattern on growth and yield of wheat, Pak. J. Agric., Agric. Eng. Vet. Sci., 2006, vol. 22, pp. 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakht, J., Qamer, Z., Shafi, M., Akber, H., Rahman, M.U., Ahmad, N., and Khan, M.J., Response of different wheat varieties to various row spacing, Sarhad J. Agric., 2007, vol. 23, pp. 839–845.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2014), Report on area and crop production forecast for major crops (for private peasant holding, Meher Season), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

  6. CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre) (2011), Wheat global alliance for improving food security and the livelihoods of the resource poor in the developing world. Proposal submitted by CIMMYT and ICARDA to the CGIAR Consortium Board. August 30, 2011.

  7. Coventry, D.R., Reeves, T.G., Brooke, H.D., and Cann, D.K., Influence of genotype, sowing date, and seeding rate on wheat development and yield, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 1993, vol. 33, pp. 751–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis, B.C., Wheat in the World. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations): Plant Production and Protection. (FAO, Rome), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2013), World Crop Production Data. http://www.faostat.fao.org/site.

  10. Gawali, A., Puril, S., and Swamy, S.L., Evaluation growth and yield of wheat varieties under Ceiba pentandra based agrisilviculture system, Univers. J. Agric. Res., 2015, vol. 3, pp. 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geleta, B., Atak, M., Baenziger, P.S., Nelson, L.A., Baltenesperger, D.D., Eskridge, K.M., Shipman, M.J., and Shelton, D.R., Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat, Crop Sci., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 827–832.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hameed, E., Wajid, S.A., Shad, A.A., Bakht, J., and Muhammad, T., Effect of different planting dates, seed rates and nitrogen levels on wheat, Asian J. Plant Sci., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 464–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain, M.I. and Shah, S.H., Growth, yield and quality response of three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties to different levels of N, P and K, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2002, vol. 4, pp. 362–364.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hussain, M., Mehmood, Z., Khan, M.B., and Farooq, S., Narrow spacing insures higher productivity of low tillering wheat cultivars, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2012, vol. 14, pp. 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iqbal, N., Akbar, N., Ali, M., Sattar, M., and Ali, L., Effect of seed rate and row spacing on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), J. Agric. Res., 2010, vol. 48, pp. 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kalpana, A., Prusty, P., and Mukhopadhyay, S.K., Performance of wheat genotypes under different row spacing in New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal, J. Crop Weed, 2014, vol. 10, pp. 480–483.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khakwani, A.A., Dennett, M.D., Munir, M., and Abid, M., Growth and yield response of wheat varieties to water stress at booting and anthesis stages of development, Pak. J. Bot., 2012, vol. 44, pp. 879–886.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mali, H. and Choudhary, J., Performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under different row spacing, J. Wheat, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marwat, A.Q., Khalil, S.K., Wazir, A.L., and Iqbal, M., Effect of land preparation and raw spacing on plant height and straw yield on wheat, Sarhad J. Agric., 1989, vol. 5, pp. 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naseri, R., Soleymanifard, A., Khoshkhabar, H., Mirzaei, A., and Nazaralizadeh, K., Effect of plant spacing on grain yield and yield components and associated traits of three durum wheat cultivars in western Iran, Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci., 2012, vol. 4, pp. 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nizamani, G.S., Imtiaz, A.K., Khatri, A., Siddiqui, M.A., Nizamani, M.R., and Khaskheli, M.I., Influence of different row spacing on agronomic traits in different wheat varieties, Int. J. Drug Dev. Res., 2014, vol. 4. pp. 2207–2211.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rahman, M.A., Hossain, S.J., Hossain, M.B., Ami, M.R., and Sarkar, K.K., Effect of variety and culture method on the yield and yield attributes of wheat, Int. J. Sustainable Crop Prod., 2010, vol. 5, pp. 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saeed, B., Hasina-Gul, A., Anwar, S., Khan, A., Azra, A.S., and Naz, I., Performance of wheat varieties sown under solid and skip row geometry, J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2012, vol. 7, pp. 545–548.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shahzad, M.A., Din, W.U., Sahi, S.T., Khan, M.M., Ehsanullah, K., and Ahmad, M., Effect of sowing dates and seed treatment on grain yield and quality of wheat, Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 2007, vol. 44, pp. 581–583.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Singh, R.P. and Trethowan, R., Breeding spring bread wheat for irrigated and rainfed production systems of the developing world, in Breeding Major Food Staples, Kang, M. and Priyadarshan, P.M., Eds., Nakuru, Kenya: CIMMYT, 2007, pp. 109–140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Singh.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yohannes, H., Singh, S. & Ousman, Y. Enhancing Wheat Productivity with an Adequate Population of Preferred Varieties in Ethiopia. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 49, 292–298 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367423030072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367423030072

Keywords:

Navigation