Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptability of the Sorghum Bicolor Rhizosphere Microbiocoenosis Inoculated by Microbial Agents in Southern Chernozem Soils

  • AGRICULTURAL SOIL SCIENCE AND AGROECOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of presowing inoculation of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seeds with a multifunctional microbial complex (MC) on the adaptability of its rhizosphere microbiocoenosis and crop yield in steppe conditions. The MC includes a number of bacterial strains (Paenibacillus рolуmуха P, Lelliottia nimipressuralis 32-3, and Agrobacterium radiobacter 204) and an association of endomycorrhizal fungi Rhizophagus sp. P3 from the collection of the Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea. The study was performed in 2018–2020 as part of a stationary field experiment conducted to determine the applicability of no-tillage technologies in Crimean steppes. The microbiocoenosis structure was determined using standard abundance estimation techniques developed for various ecological–trophic microbial groups inhabiting the grain sorghum rhizosphere in the heading phase. The heatmap technique was used to visualize the obtained data. It is established that ammonifiers and micromycetes inhabiting the sorghum rhizosphere are resistant to arid conditions observed in 2018 and 2020. Amylolytics and pedotrophs feature the lowest activity levels in the rhizosphere compared to other groups. The proportion of effect caused by the grain sorghum inoculation with MC on the abundance of ecological–trophic groups varies from 1.3 to 9.0%. The MC application increases the abundance of ammonifiers, amylolytics, oligotrophs, pedotrophs, and micromycetes in the rhizosphere up to 4.0 times in years featuring moderate droughts. On average for 2018–2020, presowing inoculation of grain sorghum with MC boosted its yield by 0.23 t/ha (15%) in comparison with the control (no seed inoculation). Overall, the application of microbial preparations containing bioagent strains in the no-tillage farming system optimizes the rhizosphere microbiota functioning and increases the adaptive potential of plants to adverse environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Zavalin, A.A., Dridiger V. K., Belobrov V. P., et al., Nitrogen in chernozems under traditional and direct seeding cropping systems: a review, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2018, vol. 51, pp. 1497–1506. .https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032180X18120146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekwunife, K.C., Madramootoo, C.A., and Abbasi, N.A., Assessing the impacts of tillage, cover crops, nitrification, and urease inhibitors on nitrous oxide emissions over winter and early spring, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2021. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00374-021-01605-w. Cited March 17, 2022.

  3. Dhillon, B.S., Kumar, V., Sagwal, P., et al., Seed priming with potassium nitrate and gibberellic acid enhances the performance of dry direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) in North-Western India, Agronomy, 2021, vol. 11, no. 849. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/5/849. Cited March 17, 2022.

  4. Kawa, N.C.A., “Win-Win” for Soil Conservation? How Indiana row-crop farmers perceive the benefits (and trade-offs) of no-till agriculture, Culture Agric. Food Environ., 2021, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia, M.V.C., Nogueira, M.A., and Hungria, M., Combining microorganisms in inoculants is agronomically important but industrially challenging: case study of a composite inoculant containing Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum for the soybean crop, AMB Express, 2021, vol. 11, art. ID. 71. https://amb-express.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13568-021-01230-8#citeas. Cited March 17, 2022.

  6. Kumar, P., Brar, S.K., Pandove, G., et al., Bioformulation of Azotobacter spp. and Streptomyces badius on theproductivity, economics and energetics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Energy, 2021, vol. 232, art. ID 120868. https://doi.org/. Cited March 17, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120868

  7. Petrov, V.B. and Chebotar’, V.K., Microbiological preparations as the basis element of intensive agrotechnologies in crop production, Gl. Agronom, 2011, no. 5, pp. 11–15.

  8. Tikhonovich, I.A. and Provorov, N.A., Agricultural microbiology as the basis of ecologically sustainable agriculture: fundamental and applied aspects, S-kh. Biol., 2011, no. 3, pp. 3–9.

  9. Kolomiets, E., Sverchkova, N., and Mandrik-Litvinkovich, M., Environmentally friendly biotechnology for agriculture, Nauka Innovatsii, 2019, vol. 3, no. 193, pp. 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bomfim, C.A., Coelho, L.G.F., do Vale, H.M.M., et al., Brief history of biofertilizers in Brazil: from conventional approaches to new biotechnological solutions, Braz. J. Microbiol., 2021, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 2215–2232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00618-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdurashitova, E.R., Mel’nichuk, T.N., and Abdurashitov, S.F., Evaluation of the biological activity of the rhizosphere sorghum bicolor under the influence of microbial preparations using no-till technology in the Crimean steppe, Ekosistemy, 2021, no. 26, pp. 116–123. https://doi.org/10.37279/2414-4738-2021-26-116-123

  12. Toju, H., Peay, K.G., Yamamichi, M., et al., Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems, Nat. Plants, 2018, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verkhovtseva, N.V. and Romanycheva, A.A., Productivity of corn (Zea mays L.) and microbial cenosis of its rhizosphere in permanent sowing and crop rotation, Agrokhimiya, 2015, no. 9, pp. 80–94.

  14. Dospekhov, B.A., Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoi obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovanii) (Methods of Field Tests (with the Fundamentals of Statistical Processing of Research Results), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985.

  15. Tepper, E.Z., Shil’nikova, V.K., and Pereverzeva, G.I., Praktikum po mikrobiologii (Workshop on Microbiology), Moscow: Drofa, 2005.

  16. Nikitin, D.A., Ivanova, E.A., A.D., Zhelezova, et al., Assessment of the impact of no-till and conventional tillage technologies on the microbiome of southern agrochernozems, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2020, vol. 53, pp. 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X20120084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Men’kina, E.A., Influence of elements in the cultivation technology on moisture availability and activity of ecological trophic groups in common chernozem microorganisms, S-kh. Zh., 2019, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.25930/003.2.12.2019

  18. Kutovaya, O.V., Tkhakakhova, A.K., Semenov, V., et al., Comparative evaluation of the influence of no-till and traditional treatment on the biological activity of agricultural chernozem of the Stavropol region, Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva, 2019, no. 100, pp. 159–189. https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2019-100-159-189

  19. Chen, D., Feng, Q.Y., and Liang, H.Q., Effects of long-term discharge of acid mine drainage from abandoned coalmines on soil microorganisms: microbial community structure, interaction patterns, and metabolic functions, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2021, vol. 28, no. 38, pp. 53936–53952. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-14566-2. Cited March 17, 2022.

  20. Tonkha, O.L., Balaev, A.D., and Nedbaev, V.N., Microbial transformation of organic matter in chernozems of the forest-steppe and steppe of Ukraine with their different use, Vestn. Kursk. Gos. S-kh. Akad., 2014, no. 4, pp. 50–54.

  21. Slavkina, V.P., Microbiological activity of meadow-soddy soil when using diversified green manures, Mezhdunar. Nauchno-Issled. Zh., 2019, vol. 11, no. 89, pp. 63–66. https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2019.89.11.046

  22. Tikhonovich, I.A. and Kruglov, Yu.V., Microbiological aspects of soil fertility and problems of sustainable agriculture, Plodorodie, 2006, no. 5, pp. 9–12.

  23. Kutovaya, O.V., Tkhakakhova, A.K., Semenov, M.V., et al., Comparative evaluation of the influence of no-till and traditional treatment on the biological activity of agricultural chernozem of the Stavropol region, Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva, 2019, no. 100, pp. 159–189. https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2019-100-159-189

  24. Dobrovol’skaya, T.G., Zvyagintsev, D.G., Chernov, I.Yu., et al., The role of microorganisms in the ecological functions of soils, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2015, vol. 48, pp. 959–967. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X15090038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirchink, T.G., Pochvennaya mikologiya (Soil Mycology), Moscow: Mosk. Univ., 1988.

Download references

Funding

The study was performed as part of the State Assignment, project no. AAAA-A16-116022610119-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. R. Abdurashytova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Emeliyanov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdurashytova, E.R., Melnichuk, T.N., Abdurashytov, S.F. et al. Adaptability of the Sorghum Bicolor Rhizosphere Microbiocoenosis Inoculated by Microbial Agents in Southern Chernozem Soils. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 48, 212–218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367422030028

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367422030028

Keywords:

Navigation