Skip to main content
Log in

Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Spring Wheat Inoculated with Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium in Soil Contaminated with Nickel

  • AGRICULTURAL SOIL SCIENCE AND AGROECOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the effect of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens 20 on spring wheat productivity in agrogray soil artificially contaminated with a water-soluble nickel compound. Plants were grown until the booting stage; NPK fertilizers and NiCl2⋅6H2O were applied to soil. The contaminant application rate was 300 mg Ni/kg soil, which significantly exceeds its maximum permissible concentration in soils. The chemical composition of plants and the uptake of nickel and nutrients from soil by shoots and roots were examined. Concentrations of Ni and other ash elements were determined after wet combustion of plant samples using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and flame photometry. The nitrogen content in plants was determined using the phenol method. Bacterial inoculation increases the resistance of plants to toxic effects of the heavy metal, which is expressed in the higher weight of their vegetative organs and roots in contaminated conditions. Simultaneously the mineral nutrition of spring wheat improves, and the from soil by the plants increases; apparently, this manifests their protective response to soil contamination with Ni. The general growth promotion observed in bacterially inoculated plants is not accompanied by significant changes in the content of elements in their shoots and roots. The application of the bacterium intensifies Ni phytoextraction from soil (i.e., soil purification from the heavy metal) and the Ni uptake by roots without significant changes in its concentration in shoots and roots. The amounts of metal accumulated in roots exceed those accumulated in shoots by an order of magnitude. Regardless of bacterial inoculation, soil contamination with Ni increases the content of Mg and some other nutrients in shoots and roots of plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Neitralizatsiya zagryaznennykh pochv (Neutralization of Contaminated Soils), Mazhaiskii, Yu.A., Ed., Ryazan: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Gidrotekh. Melior., 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Handsa, A., Kumar, V., Anshumali, A., et al., Phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soil using plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a current perspective, Recent Res. Sci. Technol., 2014, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anokhina, T.O., Siunova, T.V., Sizova, O.I., et al., Rhizosphere bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas in modern agrobiotechnology, Agrokhimiya, 2018, no.10, pp. 54–66.

  4. Chandel, A.K., Chen, H., Ch. Sharma, H., et al., Beneficial microbes for sustainable agriculture, in Microbes for Sustainable Development and Bioremediation, Chandra, R. and Sobti, R.C., Eds., Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorjey, S., Dolkar, D., and Sharma, R., Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas: a review, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 2017, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1335–1344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalita, M., Bharadwaz, M., Dey, T., et al., Developing novel bacterial based bioformulation having PGPR properties for enhanced production of agricultural crops, Indian J. Exp. Biol., 2015, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 56–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burd, G.I., Dixon, D.G., and Glick, B.R., A plant growth-promoting bacterium that decreases nickel toxicity in seedlings, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1998, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3663–3668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farwell, A.J., Vesely, S., Nero, V., et al., The use of transgenic canola (Brassica napus) and plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance plant biomass at a nickel-contaminated field site, Plant Soil, 2006, vol. 288, nos. 1–2, pp. 309–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farwell, A.J., Vesely, S., Nero, V., et al., Tolerance of transgenic canola plants (Brassica napus) amended with plant growth-promoting bacteria to flooding stress at a metal-contaminated field site, Environ. Pollut., 2007, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 540–545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shabaev, V.P., Soil-agrochemical aspects of remediation of a gray forest soil polluted with Pb upon the application of growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2012, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 539–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shabayev, V.P., Bocharnikova, E.A., and Ostroumov, V.E., Remediation of cadmium-polluted soil using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and natural zeolite, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2020, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 809–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shabayev, V.P., Mineral nutrition of plants inoculated with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria of Pseudomonas genus, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2012, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 487–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brahmaprakash, G.P., et al., Beneficial role of rhizosphere microbes on plants, in Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives, Vol. 1: Fundamental Mechanisms, Methods and Functions, Ch. 10: Microbial Functions of the Rhizosphere, Singh, D.R., Singh, H.B., and Prabha, R., Eds., Singapore: Springer-Verlag, 2017, ch. 10.4, pp. 185–189.

  14. Tank, N. and Saraf, M., Enhancement of plant growth and decontamination of nickel-spiked soil using PGPR, J. Basic Microbiol., 2009, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 195–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M., Luo, Y., et al., Inoculation of endophytic bacteria on host and non-host plants—Effects on plant growth and Ni uptake, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, vol. 195, pp. 230–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaznina, N.M. and Titov, A.F., The influence of cadmium on physiological processes and productivity of Poaceae plants, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2014, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajkumar, M. and Freitas, H., Effects of inoculation of plant-growth promoting bacteria on Ni uptake by Indian mustard, Bioresour. Technol., 2008, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 3491–3498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the Center of Collective Usage of the Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, for determination of ash elements in solutions.

Funding

This study was performed as part of the State Assignment Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Processes in Anthropogenically Altered Soils, projects no. AAA-A-A18-118013190180-9 and AAA-A18-118013190181-6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Shabayev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by the authors.

Additional information

Translated by L. Emeliyanov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shabayev, V.P., Ostroumov, V.E. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Spring Wheat Inoculated with Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium in Soil Contaminated with Nickel. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 47, 601–605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367421060112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367421060112

Keywords:

Navigation