Advertisement

Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 39–48 | Cite as

Salinity Effect of Animal Manure on Leafy Vegetable Yield

  • A. O. M. Okorogbona
  • W. van Averbeke
  • O. J. Azeez
Crop Production

Abstract

Crop produce maximum yield at optimum fertiliser level. Excess nutrient in soil limits germination, growth and yield. Efficient use of manure requires persistent development to enable recommendation for its safe application rate. To this end, this research evaluated the effect of salinity from different application rates of manure on yield of vegetables. Green house and laboratory assays were used for vegetable growth and the determination of electrical conductivity (EC), respectively. Salinity effect on plant growth occurred to be a function of manure type. Optimum salinity level of poultry manure ranged from 15.6 to 21.8 mS m–1 EC. For goat manure, optimum EC ranged from 29.1 to 59.2 mS m–1. For cattle manure, EC was about 42.3 mS m–1 but for Chinese cabbage, the highest biomass was obtained at the highest EC of 47.4 mS m–1. Salinity differed considerably among manures.

Keywords

organic fertilisers chemical fertilisers electrical conductivity crops crop biomass production 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gosh, P.K., Ramesh, P., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Tripathi, A.K., Hati, K.M., Misra, A.K., and Acharya, C.L., Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics, Bioresour. Technol., 2004, vol. 95, pp. 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathers, A.C. and Stewart, B.A., Corn silage yield and soil chemical properties as affected by cattle feedlot manure, J. Environ. Qual., 1974, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shortall, J.G. and Liebhardt, W.C., Yield and growth of corn as affected by poultry manure, J. Environ. Qual., 1975, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goh, K.M. and Vityakon, P., Effects of fertilizers on vegetable production. 1. Yield of spinach and beetroot as affected by rates and forms of nitrogenous fertilizers, New Zeal. J. Agr. Res., 1983, vol. 26, pp. 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujiwara, T., Murakami, K., Yoshida, E., and Takahashi, I., Potential of near infrared spectroscopy to determine the lipid content of untreated garbage compost, Jpn. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 2009, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murphy, L.S., Wallingford, G.W., Powers, W.L., and Manges, H.L., Effects of solid beef feedlot wastes on soil conditions and plant growth, in Waste Management Research, Proceedings of the Cornell Agricultural Waste Management Conference, 1972, pp. 449–464.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suárez, N. and Medina, E., Salinity effect on plant growth and leaf demography of the mangrove, Avicennia germinaus L., Trees, 2005, vol. 19, pp. 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ball, M.C. and Pidsley, S.M., Growth responses to salinity in relation to distribution of two mangrove species, Sonneratia alba and S. lanceolata, in northern Australia, Funct. Ecol., 1995, vol. 9, pp. 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuma, G.E. and McCalla, T.M., Effect of shortchain fatty acids extracted from beef cattle manure on germination and seedling development, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1976, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 655–660.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munns, R. and Termaat, A., Whole-plant responses to salinity, Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1986, vol. 13, pp. 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Azeez, J.O., Van Averbeke, W., and Okorogbona, A.O.M., Differential responses in yield of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima L.) and nightshade (Solanum retroflexum Dun.) to the application of three animal manures, Bioresour. Technol., 2010, vol. 101, pp. 2499–2505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turner, J.C., Hattey, J.A., Warren, J.G., and Penn, C.J., Electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio changes following annual applications of animal manure amendments, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2010, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1043–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Averbeke, W., Juma, K.A., and Tshikalange, T.E., Yield response of African leafy vegetables to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: The case of Brassica rapa L. subsp. chinensis and Solanum retroflexum Dun., Water SA, 2007, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 355–362.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schlossberg, M.J., Waltz, F., Jr., Landschoot, P.J., and Bradley, S.P., Recent mechanical cultivation of lawns enhances lime application efficacy, Agron. J., 2008, vol. 100, pp. 855–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ARC-ISCW (Agricultural Research Council-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water), Report Number Ground 200708 3902, Pretoria: The Institute, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peters, J., Combs, S.M., Hoskins, B., Jarman, J., Kovar, J.L., Watson, M.E., Wolf, A.M., and Wolf, N., Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis, Madison: Cooperative Extension Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramusandiwa, T.D., Van Averbeke, W., and Slabbert, M.M., Response of Selected African Leafy Vegetables in Pots to Application Rate of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium, Tshwane University of Technology, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dikinya, O. and Mufwanzala, N., Chicken manureenhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates, J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manage., 2010, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 46–54.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharifi, R.S. and Taghizadeh, R., Response of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars to different levels of nitrogen fertilizer, J. Food Agric. Environ., 2009, vol. 7, nos. 3–4, pp. 519–521.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Javahery, S. and Zarei, H., Comparison of some nutrient content of sport lawn under the influence of fertiliser and seasons, J. Adv. Lab. Res. Biol., 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 56–62.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilkinson, S.R., Plant nutrient and economic value of animal manures, J. Ani. Sci., 1979, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 123–133.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbasi, M.K., Hina, M., Khalique, A., and Khan, S.R., Mineralization of three organic manures used as nitrogen source in a soil incubated under laboratory conditions, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2007, vol. 38, pp. 1691–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jen-Hshuan, C., The combined use of chemical and inorganic fertilisers and/or biofertiliser for crop growth and soil fertility, International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil–Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertiliser Use, Bangkok, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shannon, M.C. and Grieve, C.M., Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity, Sci. Hortic., 1999, vol. 78, pp. 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. O. M. Okorogbona
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. van Averbeke
    • 1
  • O. J. Azeez
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Organic and Smallholder Agriculture, Department of Crop SciencesTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.AgChem Africa (Pty) Ltd.PretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Soil Science and Land ManagementFederal University of AgricultureAbeokutaNigeria

Personalised recommendations