Skip to main content
Log in

Growth and yield response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to phosphobacterial inoculation

  • Plant Industry
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

In this study growth and yield response of wheat crop to phosphobacterium inoculum was observed under sandy loam conditions. The investigations were carried out at field experiment. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design. The treatments were; 120-0-0 NPK kg/ha−1 (T 1), 120-50-0 kg/ha−1 (T 2), 120-100-0 NPK kg/ha−1 (T 3), T 1 + Phosphobacterium inoculum (T 4), T 2 + Phosphobacterium inoculum (T 5) and T 3 + Phosphobacterium inoculum (T 6).The results showed that bacterial strain (Pseudomonas spp.) was able to effect on yield and its attributes in wheat crop. The crop showed significant positive results. The inoculation significantly stimulates the germination count (m−2), number of tillers and spikes (m−2), 1000 grains weight (g) and grain yield (kg/ha−1). We suggest that application of 120-100-0 kg/ha−1 NPK along with coating of seed with phosphobacterium (Pseudomonas spp.) all the way through inoculation is a better practice to reduce the exploit of phosphatic fertilizers which are much costly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afzal, A. and Asghari, B., Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Improve the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Int. J. Agri. Biol., 2008, vol. 10, pp. 85–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brimecombe, M.J., De Lelj, F.A., and Lynch, J.M., The Rhizosphere. The Effect of Root Exudates on Rhizosphere Microbil Populations, in The Rhizosphere. Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface, Pinton, R., Varanini, Z., and Nannipieri, P., Eds., New York: Marcel Dekker, 2001, pp. 95–140.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Egamberdieva, D., Growth Response of Wheat Cultivars to Bacterial Inoculation in Calcareous Soil, Plant Soil Environ., 2010, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 570–573.

    Google Scholar 

  4. He, Z. and Zhu, J., Microbial Utilization and Transformation of phosphate Adsorbed by Variable Charged Minerals, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1988, vol. 30, pp. 917–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lugtenberg, B.J.J., Dekkers, L., and Bloemberg, G.V., Molecular Determinants of Rhizosphere Colonization by Pseudomonas, Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2001, vol. 39, pp. 461–490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lugtenberg, B.J. and Kamilova, F., Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria, Annual Review of Microbiology, 2009, vol. 63, pp. 541–556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nannipieri, P., Ascher, J., Ceccherini, M.T.L., Landi, L., Pietramellara, G., and Renella, G., Microbial Diversity and Soil Functions, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2003, vol. 54, pp. 655–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Öztürk, A., Cağlar, O., and Sahin, F., Yield Response of Wheat and Barley to Inoculation of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria at Various Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 2003, vol. 166, pp. 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pal, S.S., Interaction of an Acid Tolerant Strain of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria with a Few Acid Tolerant Crops, Plant Soil, 1999, vol. 213, pp. 221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul, D. and Nair, S., Stress Adaptations in a Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterium (PGPR) with Increasing Salinity in the Coastal Agricultural Soils, Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2008, vol. 48, pp. 378–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Raja, A.R., Shah, K.H., Aslam, M., and Memon, M.Y., Response of Phosphobacterial and Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Wheat, Asian J. Plant Sciences, 2002, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 322–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rovira, A.D., Microbial Inoculation of Plants. Establishment of Free Living N2 Fixing Bacteria on Maize and Wheat, Plant Soil, 1963, vol. 19, pp. 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salantur, A., Ozturk, A., and Akten, S., Growth and Yield Response of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Inoculation with Rhizobacteria, Plant Soil Environ., 2006, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., and Dickey, D.A., Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1997, 3rd ed., pp. 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tiwari, V.N., Lehri, L.K., and Pathak, A.N., Effect of Inoculating Crops with Phospho-Microbes, Exp. Agric., 1989, vol. 25, pp. 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uren, N.C., Types, Amounts and Possible Functions of Compounds Released into the Rhizosphere by Soil-Grown Plants, in The Rhizosphere. Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface, Pinton, R., Varanini, Z., and Nannipieri, P., Eds., FL: Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2007, pp. 1–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asmat Ullah Malik.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Cite this article

Malik, A.U., Malghani, A.L. & Hussain, F. Growth and yield response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to phosphobacterial inoculation. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 38, 11–13 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3103/S106836741201003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S106836741201003X

Keywords

Navigation