Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cost Minimization in Russia’s Mining Industry

  • PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY
  • Published:
Coke and Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Costs at coal mining companies are analyzed. The production dynamics of coal and other minerals is studied. By vertical and horizontal analysis of annual financial statements, the cost dynamics and structure at major Russian coal mining companies are calculated. The costs and financial results of mining companies are compared. A matrix describing the economic effects of cost minimization at coal mining companies proposed. The possibility of cost optimization by internal management mechanisms is assessed for Russian coal mining companies. A cost classification is proposed for coal mining companies, in terms of causative factors, responsible parties, risks, and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

REFERENCES

  1. Busyrev, V.M., Ekonomicheski sbalansirovannoe nedropol’zovanie. Monografiya (Economically Balanced Subsurface Use: Monograph), Apatity: Izd-vo Kol’skii Nauchnyi Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2020.

  2. Kharitonova, T.V. and Shvandar, D.V., Research approaches to the management of costs and financial results at the enterprises of the coal industry in the context of the transformation of the global coal market, Ugol’, 2019, no. 4, pp. 30–35. https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2019-4-30-34

  3. Lyubimova, N.G. and Linnik, Yu.N., Competitiveness of coal generation in Russia, Ugol’, 2019, no. 2, pp. 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2019-5-34-38

  4. Ryabova, E.V., Feruleva, N.V., and Zamotaeva, O.A., Assessing the investment attractiveness of oil field development projects under the tax maneuver: The evidence from West Siberia, Finansovyi Zh., 2022, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 86–101. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-3-86-101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. General information on El’ginsky ugol’nyi kompleks company. https://elga.ru/ru/company. Cited February 9, 2023.

  6. On the AO UK Kuzbassrazrezugol’. https://www.kru.ru/ru/about/. Cited February 9, 2023.

  7. Yakutugol’. https://www.mechel.ru/sector/mining/yakutugol/. Cited February 9, 2023.

  8. Net sales of SUEK in 2021 decreased by 48.41% and counted to 74.51 billion rubles. Net income was 18.81 billion rubles. https://cbonds.ru/news/1670493/. Cited April 11, 2023.

  9. Klepcha, K., Ogorodnikov, E., and Remizov, M., In full sales into the new crisis, Ekspert, 2022, no. 41, pp. 66–96.

  10. Belikova, S.S. and Belikov, A.V., East and West: Global challenges to achieving carbon neutrality, Upravlenie, 2022, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-2-5-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davaakhuu, N., Potravnyi, I.M., Miloslavskii, V.G., and Utkin, I.I., Substantiation and mechanism of implementation of the project of coal gasification in Russian Arctic, Ugol’, 2019, no. 9, pp. 88–93. https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2019-9-88-93

  12. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, Survey of Russian practices in the sphere of low-carbon development and adaptation to climate change.

  13. Climatic risks in changing economic conditions: Report for social consultations, Moscow, 2022. https://cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/143643/Consultation_Paper_21122022.pdf.

  14. Porfir’ev, B.N., Eliseev, D.O., Kolpakov, A.Yu., and Streletskii, D.A., Assessment and forecasting of additional costs of oil-production companies to reduce risks from permafrost degradation, Probl. Prognozirovaniya, 2022, no. 6, pp. 120–130. https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-195-120-130

  15. Nazarova, V.V. and Ivanova, A.A. Investor payout policy selection: A study of the US market, Finansovyi Zhurnal, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89–107.

  16. Zhou, L.-J., Cao, Q.-G., Yu, K., Wang, L.-L., and Wang, H.-B., Research on occupational safety, health management and risk control technology in coal mines, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050868

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gruenhagen, J.H. and Parker, R., Factors driving or impeding the diffusion and adoption of innovation in mining: A systematic review of the literature, Resour. Policy, 2020, vol. 65, p. 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Book Review: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, Energy Explor. Exploitation, 2023, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 468–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/014459878900700615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahamer, G., Scenarios of systemic transitions in energy and economy, Foresight STI Governance, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 17–34. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.3.17.34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sectoral Economic Center, Finance Research Institute, Russian Ministry of Finance, Moscow, Russia

    R. S. Gubanov

Authors
  1. R. S. Gubanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Gubanov.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by B. Gilbert

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gubanov, R.S. Cost Minimization in Russia’s Mining Industry. Coke Chem. 66, 232–236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X23700679

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X23700679

Search

Navigation