Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Electrolyte Overheating and Composition on the Sideledge of an Aluminum Bath

  • METALLURGY OF NONFERROUS METALS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the electrolyte chemical composition and overheating on the size of a sideledge formed in an aluminum-smelting bath is investigated theoretically. Three electrolyte compositions are chosen: sodium cryolite with the cryolite ratio (CR) = 2.7, cryolite (CR) = 2.7 + 5 wt % CaF2, and cryolite (CR) = 2.7 + 5 wt % CaF2 + 5 wt % Al2O3. The electrolyte liquidus overheating temperatures are 5, 10, 15 and 20oC. The calculations are performed using the finite-element method. A simplified design of an aluminum cell with a prebaked anode is used. To calculate the temperature field, a mathematical model in the Boussinesq approximation is used. The model contains the Navier–Stokes equation, the thermal conductivity equation, and the incompressibility equation. The key role of electrolyte overheating on the sideledge formation is established. The resulting sideledge profile depends on the heat transfer coefficients and thermal properties of materials. The smallest sideledge thickness with the same electrolyte overheating is observed in cryolite with CR = 2.7, 5 wt % CaF2, and 5% by weight of Al2O3, and formed sideledge profiles for cryolite with KO = 2.7 and cryolite with KO = 2.7 and 5 wt % CaF2 almost coincide. The thickness of the sideledge formed with overheating of 5 K is from 7 cm or more, and the difference in temperature between the sideledge touching the electrolyte and airborne block wall is 20–25 K. Almost complete sideledge disappearance occurs when the electrolyte liquidus is overheated by 20 K.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Capitance, W. and Schmidt-Hatting, W., Magnetic fields in high amperage aluminum reduction cells, JOM, 1965, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, J. and Dupuis, M., In-depth analysis of lining designs for several 420 kA electrolytic cells, Light Met, 2015, pp. 685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Welch, B.J., Hyland, M.M., and James, B.J., Future materials requirements for the high-energy-intensity production of aluminum, JOM, 2001, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kvande, H., Bath chemistry and aluminum cell performance: facts, fictions, and doubts, JOM, 1994, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haupin, W., The influence of bath additives on Hall-Heroult bath properties, JOM, 1991, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dupuis, M., Computation of aluminum reduction cell energy balance using ANSYS ® Finite element models, TMS Light Met., 1998, pp. 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beier, S., Chen, J., Fortin, H., and Fafard, M., FEM analysis of the anode connection in aluminum reduction cell, Light Met., 2011, pp. 979–984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wei, L., Jie, L., Yan-qing, L., and Ye-xiang, L., 2D Finite element analysis of thermal balance for drained aluminum reduction cells, J. Centr. South Univ. Technol., 2007, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 783–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dupius, M., Using ANSYS to model aluminum reduction cell since 1984 and beyond, in Proc. ANSYS Reg. Conf., Toronto, 2002.

  10. Taylor, M., Etzion, R., Lavoie, P., and Tan, J.N., Energy balance regulation and flexible production: A new frontier for aluminum smelting, Metall. Mater. Trans. E, 2014, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 292–302.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lavoie, P., Namboothiri, S., Dorreen, M., Chen, J., Zeigler, D., and Taylor, M., Increasing the power modulation window of aluminium smelter pots with shell heat exchanger technology, Light Met., 2011, pp. 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thonstad, J., Fellner, P., Haarberg, G.M., Hives, J., Kvande, H., and Sterten, A., Aluminium Electrolysis: Fundamentals of the Hall-Heroult Process, Dusseldorf: Aluminium-Verlag Market. Kommun., 2001, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Solheim, A., Some aspects of heat transfer between bath and sideledge in aluminium reduction cells, Light Met., 2011, pp. 381–386.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, P. and Welch, B., Melt/freeze heat transfer measurements in cryolite-based electrolytes, Metall. Trans. B, 1987, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Borisoglebskii, Yu.B., Galevskii, G.V., Kulagin, N.M., Mintsis, M.Ya., and Sirazutdinov, G.A., Metallurgiya aluminiya: Uchebnoe posobie (Aluminum Metallurgy: Textbook), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1999.

  16. Arkhipov, G.V., Pingin, V.V., Tretyakov, Y.A., and Polyakov, P.V., Simulation of cell thermoelectric field with consideration of electrochemical processes, Light Met., 2007, pp. 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balkevich, V.L., Tehnicheskaya keramika: Uchebnik dlya vysshykh uchebnykh zavedenii (Technical Ceramics: Textbook for Higher Schools), Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1984.

  18. ASM Metals Handbook. Vol. 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys, ASM, 1990, 10th ed.

  19. Desai, P.D., Chu, T.K., James, H.M., and Ho, C.Y., Electrical resistivity of selected elements, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1984, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1069–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinno, H., Kitajima, M., and Okada, M., Thermal stress analysis of high heat flux materials, J. Nucl. Mater., 1988, vols. 155–157, pp. 290–294.

  21. Giordanengo, B., Benazzi, N., Vinckel, J., Gasser, J.G., and Roubi, L., Thermal conductivity of liquid metals and metallic alloys, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2000, vols. 250–252, pp. 377–383.

  22. Gale, W.F. and Totemeier, T.C., Smithells Metals Reference Book, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Iida, T. and Guthrie, R.I.L., The Physical Properties of Liquid Metals, Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, agreement no. 14.607.21.0146; the unique agreement identifier is RFMEFI60716X0146.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. V. Stakhanov, A. A. Redkin, Yu. P. Zaikov or A. E. Galashev.

Additional information

Translated by N. Korovin

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stakhanov, V.V., Redkin, A.A., Zaikov, Y.P. et al. Influence of Electrolyte Overheating and Composition on the Sideledge of an Aluminum Bath. Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals 59, 471–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821218050188

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821218050188

Keywords:

Navigation