Abstract
In this paper, we consider a wave equation with incomplete data, where we do not know the potential coefficient and the initial conditions. From observing the system in the boundary, we want to get information on the potential coefficient independently of the initial conditions. This can be obtained using the sentinel method of Lions, which is a functional insensitive to certain parameters. Shows us through the adjoint system that the existence of the sentinel is equivalent to an optimal control problem. We solve this optimal control problem by using the Hilbert uniqueness method (HUM).
REFERENCES
M. Bellassoued and M. Yamamoto, Carleman Estimates and Applications to Inverse Problems for Hyperbolic Systems, Springer Monogrphs in Mathematics (Springer, Tokyo, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56600-7
M. Yamamoto, “Uniqueness and stability in multidimensional hyperbolic inverse problems,” J. Math. Pures Appl. 78, 65–98 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-7824(99)80010-5
R. Rakesh, “Reconstruction for an inverse problem for the wave equation with constant velocity,” Inverse Probl. 6, 91–98 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/6/1/009
A. Khaĭdarov, “Carleman estimates and inverse problems for second order hyperbolic equations,” Math. USSR Sb. 58, 267–277 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1987v058n01ABEH003103
J.-P. Puel and M. Yamamoto, “On a global estimate in a linear inverse hyperbolic problem,” Inverse Probl. 12, 995–1002 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/12/6/013
Rakesh and W. W. Symes, “Uniqueness for an inverse problem for the wave equation: Inverse problem for the wave equation,” Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 13, 87–96 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/03605308808820539
O. Yu. Imanuvilov and M. Yamamoto, “Global Lipschitz stability in an inverse hyperbolic problem by interior observations,” Inverse Probl. 17, 717–728 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/17/4/310
O. Yu. Imanuvilov and M. Yamamoto, “Global uniqueness and stability in determining coe?cient of wave equations,” Commun. Partial Differ. Equtaions 26, 1409–1425 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1081/PDE-100106139
J.-L. Lions, Sentinelles pour les systèmes distribués à données incomplètes, Recherches en Mathématiques Appliquées, Vol. 21 (Masson, Paris, 1992).
A. Merabet, A. Ayadi, and A. Omrane, “Detection of pollution terms in nonlinear second order wave systems,” Int. J. Parallel, Emergent Distrib. Syst. 34, 13–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2017.1318134
J.-P. Kernévez, The Sentinel Method and Its Application to Environmental Pollution Problems (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1997).
F. Molinet, “Simulation numérique de problèmes d’écosystèmes. Sentinelles pour la detection d’origine de pollution,” PhD Thesis (Paris 11, 1994).
R. Mosé, M. E. Stoeckel, C. Poulard, P. Ackerer, and F. Lehmann, “Transport parameters identification: application of the Sentinel method,” Comput. Geosci. 4, 251–273 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011516101288
L. Chafia, A. Abdelhamid, and H. Abdelhak, “Identification problem of a fractional thermoelastic deformation system with incomplete data: A sentinel method,” Nonlinear Stud. 29, 399–410 (2022).
B. Amel and R. Imad, “Identification of the source term in Navier–Stokes system with incomplete data,” AIMS Math. 4, 516–526 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2019.3.516
Y. Miloudi, O. Nakoulima, and A. Omrane, “On the instantaneous sentinels in pollution problems of incomplete data,” Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 17, 451–459 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17415970802015948
A. Omrane, “Some aspects of the sentinel method for pollution problems, in Air Quality-Monitoring and Modeling (InTech, 2012), pp. 185–204. https://doi.org/10.5772/33173
S. Sandel and A. Ayadi, “Boundary sentinels for the resolution of a geometrical problem,” Turk. J. Math. 42, 548–556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1607-5
J.-L. Lions, Contrôlabilité exacte, perturbations et stabilisation de systemes distribués : Perturbations, Vol. 1 : Contrôlabilité exacte, Recherches en Mathématiques Appliquées, Vol. 8 (Masson, Paris, 1988).
J. L. Lions, “Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations for distributed systems,” SIAM Rev. 30, 1–68 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1137/1030001
B. Dehman and A. Omrane, “On the controllability under constraints on the control for hyperbolic equations,” Appl. Math. E-Notes 10, 36–39 (2010).
E. Zuazua, “Controllability and observability of partial differential equations: some results and open problems,” in Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, Vol. 3, Ed. by C. M. Dafermos and E. Feireisl (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2007), vol. 3, pp. 527–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5717(07)80010-7
V. Komornik, “A new method of exact controllability in short time and applications,” Ann. Faculté Sci. Toulouse: Math., Ser. 5 10, 415–464 (1989).
V. Komornik, Exact Controllability and Stabilization: The Multiplier Method, Recherches en Mathématiques Appliquées, Vol. 36 (Wiley-Masson, Paris, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Billal Elhamza, Abdelhak Hafdallah Identification of the Potential Coefficient in the Wave Equation with Incomplete Data: A Sentinel Method. Russ Math. 66, 102–111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X22120027
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X22120027