Abstract
For (anti-)self-dual Einsteinian metrics, as well as for any (anti-)self-dual metrics of zero signature, the number of logically possible Petrov types is seven rather than six. In addition to the usual types I, D, O, II, III, and N, type I0 is also possible with a characteristic zero root of multiplicity 4. A system of anti-self-duality equations for the Riemann tensor is compiled for a metric that is universal in the class of anti-self-dual zero-signature metrics. Particular solutions are found for all types except I0. We left open the question of the existence of the type I0. For an arbitrary metric of zero signature, all almost-Hermitian and almost para-Hermitian structures are found. All Kähler and para-Kähler structures are found for the (anti-)self-dual Einsteinian metric. For a metric of zero signature, the notion of hyper-Kählerianity is introduced for the first time. Its definition differs from that of hyper-Kählerianity for Riemann metrics, but is equivalent to it for dimension 4. Each (anti-)self-dual Einsteinian metric of zero signature is simultaneously hyper-Kählerian and para-hyper-Kählerian. Conversely, any hyper-Kählerian (para-hyper-Kählerian) four-metric of zero signature is (anti-)self-dual and Einsteinian.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
L. N. Krivonosov and V. A. Luk’yanov, “Specificity of Petrov classification of (anti-)self-dual zero signature metrics,” Russ. Math. 64, 50–60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X20090054
M. Dunajski, E. V. Ferapontov, and B. Kruglikov, “On the Einstein–Weyl and conformal self-duality equation,” J. Math. Phys. 56, 083501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927251
J. F. Plebanski, “Some solutions of complex Einstein equations,” J. Math. Phys. 16, 2395–2402 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.522505
T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, “Gravitation, gauge theories and differential geometry,” Phys. Rep. 66, 213–393 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(80)90130-1
V. F. Kirichenko, “Methods of generalized Hermitian geometry in the theory of almost-contact manifolds,” J. Sov. Math. 42, 1885–1919 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01094419
O. E. Arsen’eva, “Selfdual geometry of generalized Kählerian manifolds,” Sb. Math. 79, 447–457 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1994v079n02ABEH003509
M. F. Atiyah and N. Hitchin, The Geometry and Dynamics of Magnetic Monopoles (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1988).
L. N. Krivonosov and V. A. Luk’yanov, “Hermitian metrics with (anti-)self-dual Riemann tensor,” Vestn. Samar. Gos. Tekh. Univ. Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki 25, 616–633 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1867
M. A. Akivis and V. V. Konnov, “Some local aspects of the theory of conformal structure,” Russ. Math. Surv. 48, 1–35 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1993v048n01ABEH000984
M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, and I. M. Singer, “Self-duality in four-dimensional Riemannian geometry,” Proc. R. Soc. London A 362, 425–461. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1978.0143
A. M. Vinogradov, I. S. Krasil’shchik, and V. V. Lychagin, Introduction to the Geometry of Nonlinear Differential Equations (Nauka, Moscow, 1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by V. Arutyunyan
About this article
Cite this article
Krivonosov, L.N., Luk’yanov, V.A. (Anti-)Self-Dual Einsteinian Metrics of Zero Signature, Their Petrov Classes and Connection with Kähler and Para-Kähler Structures. Russ Math. 66, 33–45 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X22090043
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X22090043