Abstract
To assure the prevention of microbial contamination and the provision of safe potable water to consumers, efficient disinfection is the final barrier. Chlorine, once a widely applied disinfectant, has essentially been re-considered by many water treatment practitioners. Since the research unveiled chlorine-associated health repercussions, the investigation shifted to more viable disinfection options such as the use of monochloramines, that remains active in the system for relatively long periods. Keeping in view, the present study compared the biocidal competence of chlorine and monochloramine to inactivate the gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa along with the gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus. A lab-scale testing batch was set up in carefully monitored conditions to investigate the response of these bacterial species to the applied disinfection dosages of 1 and 2 mg/L. Moreover, a referenced batch of control evidenced the accuracy of results. A significant difference in the response to chlorine and monochloramine was recorded both in mixed and mono-cultures of bacteria. The bench-scale inactivation experiments revealed that chlorine and monochloramine greatly damaged K. pneumoniae and S. aureus in monocultures. Whereas these bacterial species revealed greater tolerance when acted together in a mixed-cultures and, hence, an overall lower degree of disinfection was achieved. P. aeruginosa exhibited reduced vulnerability to disinfectants in mixed-cultures, marking K. pneumoniae tolerant to chlorine. Most significant correlation between disinfectant species was found at 30 min of exposure with notable logremoval of K. pneumoniae (p = 0.01), P. aeruginosa (p = 0.003) and S. aureus (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for prolonged exposures, monochloramine is advisable owing to its immediate microbial inactivation upon contact as well as enhanced stability in drinking water networks. The results could predict the pattern of bacterial inactivation in drinking water distribution networks and fill a major gap in the water sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Fass, S., Dincher, M., Reasoner, D., Gatel, D., and Block, J., Fate of Escherichia coli experimentally injected in a drinking water distribution pilot system, Water Res., 1996, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2215–2221.
Vaz-Moreira, I., Nunes, O.C., and Manaia, C.M., Ubiquitous and persistent Proteobacteria and other Gram-negative bacteria in drinking water, Sci. Total Environ., 2017, vol. 586, pp. 1141–1149.
Gagnon, G., O’Leary, K., Volk, C.J., Chauret, C., Stover, L., and Andrews, R., Comparative analysis of chlorine dioxide, free chlorine and chloramines on bacterial water quality in model distribution systems, J. Environ. Eng., 2004, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 1269–1279.
Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Geneva: World Health Org., 2011, 4th ed.
Li, D., Zeng, S., Gu, A.Z., He, M., and Shi, H., Inactivation, reactivation and re-growth of indigenous bacteria in reclaimed water after chlorine disinfection of a municipal wastewater treatment plant, J. Environ. Sci., 2013, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1319–1325.
Oliver, J.D., Dagher, M., and Linden, K., Induction of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium into the viable but nonculturable state following chlorination of wastewater, J. Water Health, 2005, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 249–257.
Coronel-Olivares, C., Reyes-Gómez, L.M., Hernández-Muñoz, A., Martínez-Falcón, A.P., Vázquez-Rodríguez, G.A., and Iturbe, U., Chlorine disinfection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, total coliforms, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis: Revisiting reclaimed water regulations, Water Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2151–2157.
Geldreich, E.E. and Rice, E.W., Occurrence, significance, and detection of Klebsiella in water systems, J. AWWA, 1987, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 74–80.
Ayeni, F.A., Andersen, C., and Nørskov-Lauritsen, N., Comparison of growth on mannitol salt agar, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, VITEK®2 with partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci, Microb. Pathog., 2017, vol. 105, pp. 255–259.
Rasheed, S., Hashmi, I., and Campos, L., Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Salmonella with chlorine in drinking waters at various pH and temperature levels, Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci., 2016, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 83–92.
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, DC: Am. Publ. Health Assoc., 2012, vol. 22.
Shang, C. and Blatchley, E., Chlorination of pure bacterial cultures in aqueous solution, Water Res., 2001, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 244–254.
Gougoutsa, C., Christophoridis, C., Zacharis, C., and Fytianos, K., Assessment, modeling and optimization of parameters affecting the formation of disinfection by-products in water, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 16620–16630.
Cherchi, C. and Gu, A.Z., Effect of bacterial growth stage on resistance to chlorine disinfection, Water Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 7–13.
Stewart, M.H. and Olson, B.H., Physiological studies of chloramine resistance developed by Klebsiella pneumoniae under low-nutrient growth conditions, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 2918–2927.
Fazlzadeh, M., Rahmani, K., Zarei, A., Abdoallahzadeh, H., Nasiri, F., and Khosravi, R., A novel green synthesis of zero valent iron nanoparticles (NZVI) using three plant extracts and their efficient application for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, Adv. Powder Technol., 2017, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 122–130.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Pakistan Science Foundation for providing financial support through the project (PSF/Res/C-NUST/Envr(112) and Lab staff of IESE, SCEE, NUST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Amrah Qureshi, Hashmi, I., Khan, R. et al. Inactivation Dynamics of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Microbes in Drinking Water: a Comparative Study of Chlorine and Monochloramine Disinfection. J. Water Chem. Technol. 42, 381–389 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X20050112
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X20050112