Skip to main content
Log in

Individual Tree Segmentation Quality Evaluation Using Deep Learning Models LiDAR Based

  • Published:
Optical Memory and Neural Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of the forest structure makes it possible to solve many important problems of forest inventory. LiDAR scanning is one of the most widely used methods for obtaining information about a forest area today. To calculate the structural parameters of plantations, a reliable segmentation of the initial data is required, the quality of segmentation can be difficult to assess in conditions of large volumes of forest areas. For this purpose, in this work, a system of correctness and quality of segmentation was developed using deep learning models. Segmentation was carried out on a forest area with a high planting density, using a phased segmentation of layers using the DBSCAN method with preliminary detection of planting coordinates and partitioning the plot using a Voronoi diagram. The correctness model was trained and tested on the extracted data of individual trees on the PointNet ++ and CurveNet neural networks, and good model accuracies were obtained in 89 and 88%, respectively, and are proposed to use the quality assessment of clustering methods, as well as improve the quality of LiDAR data segmentation on separate point clouds of forest plantations by detecting frequently occurring segmentation defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Malankina E.L. and Tbsitsylin A.N., Lekarstvennyye i efiromaslichnyye rasteniya (Medicinal and Essential oil Plants), Ekaterinburg, 2016. ISBN 978-5-16-010957-2 (in Russian).

  2. Mukhin, A., Danil, G., and Paringer, R., Semantic segmentation of hyperspectral imaging using Convolutional Neural Networks, Opt. Mem. Neural Networks, 2022, vol. 31 (Suppl. 1), pp. 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X22050071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganchenko, V. and Doudkin, A., Agricultural vegetation monitoring based on aerial data using convolutional neural networks, Opt. Mem. Neural Networks, 2019, vol. 28, pp. 129–134. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X1902005X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhen, Z., Quackenbush, L.J., and Zhang L., Trends in automatic individual tree crown detection and delineation—Evolution of LiDAR data, Remote Sens., 2016, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, B. et al., Individual tree species classification using the pointwise MLP-based point cloud deep learning method, Environ. Sci. Proc., 2022, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maschler, J., Atzberger, C., and Immitzer, M., Individual tree crown segmentation and classification of 13 tree species using airborne hyperspectral data, Remote Sens., 2018, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michele, D., Frizzera, L., and Gianelle, D., Individual tree crown delineation and tree species classification with hyperspectral and LiDAR data, PeerJ, 2019, vol. 6: e6227. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramalho de Oliveira, L.F. et al., Moving to automated tree inventory: Comparison of UAS-derived lidar and photogrammetric data with manual ground estimates, Remote Sens., 2020, vol. 13, no 1, p. 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng Sun, Xuguang Yuan, and Dan Li, Classification of individual tree species using UAV LiDAR based on transformer, Forests, 2023, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, Y.C. et al., Leaf-off and leaf-on UAV lidar surveys for single-tree inventory in forest plantations, Drones, 2021, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5040115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Yang et al. Individual tree segmentation and tree-counting using supervised clustering, Comput. Electron. Agr., 2023, vol. 205, 107629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burt, A., Disney, M., and Calders, K., Extracting individual trees from lidar point clouds using treeseg, Methods Ecol. Evol., 2019, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu Shanshan, and Sheng Xu, Identification of street trees’ main nonphotosynthetic components from mobile laser scanning data, Opt. Mem. Neural Networks, 2020, vol. 29, pp. 305–316. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X20040062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, S.W. et al., Sloam: Semantic lidar odometry and mapping for forest inventory, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 2020, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 612–619. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.12726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grishin, I.A. et al., Tree Inventory with LiDAR Data, International Conference on Neuroinformatics, Cham: Springer, 2023, pp. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19032-2_1

  16. Qi, C.R. et al., Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017, pp. 652–660. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.00593

  17. Xiang, T. et al., Walk in the cloud: Learning curves for point clouds shape analysis, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 915–924. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.01288

  18. Grishin, I.A. and Terekhov, V.I., Procedure for locating trees and estimating diameters using LiDAR data, 2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE), IEEE, 2023, vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086843

  19. Chumachenko, S.I., Terekhov, V.I., Mitrofanov, E.T., and Grishin, I.A., An approach for estimating trees parameters using lidar data, Dinamika slozhnykh system—XXI vek (Dynamics of Complex Systems—XXI Century), 2022, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 63–73. https://doi.org/10.18127/j19997493-202204-06

  20. Ester, M. et al., A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise, Kdd, 1996, vol. 96, no. 34.

  21. Silverman, B.W., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, CRC Press, 1986, vol. 26.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Eldar, Y., Lindenbaum, M., Porat, M., and Zeevi, Y.Y., The farthest point strategy for progressive image sampling, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 1997, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.623193

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the program of strategic academic leadership “Priority-2030” “PRIOR/SN/NU/22/SP1/4”, no. 122070700013-5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to I. A. Grishin, T. Y. Krutov, A. I. Kanev or V. I. Terekhov.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grishin, I.A., Krutov, T.Y., Kanev, A.I. et al. Individual Tree Segmentation Quality Evaluation Using Deep Learning Models LiDAR Based. Opt. Mem. Neural Networks 32 (Suppl 2), S270–S276 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X23060061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X23060061

Keywords:

Navigation