Skip to main content

Series in a Lipschitz perturbation of the boundary for solving the Dirichlet problem


In a special Lipschitz domain treated as a perturbation of the upper half-space, we construct a perturbation theory series for a positive harmonic function with zero trace. The terms of the series are harmonic extensions to the half-space from its boundary of distributions defined by a recurrent formula and passage to the limit. The approximation error by a segment of the series is estimated via a power of the seminorm of the perturbation in the homogeneous Slobodestkiĭ space b 1−1/N N . The series converges if the Lipschitz constant of the perturbation is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    I. Babuška and V. Nistor, “Boundary value problems in spaces of distributions on smooth and polygonal domains,” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 218, 137 (2008).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    S. A. Belov, “Shape differentiability of solutions of boundary value problems and approximate solutions,” Differ. Uravn. 38, 63 (2002) [Differ. Equ. 38, 67 (2002)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    O. V. Besov, V. P. Il'in, and S. M. Nikol’skii, Integral Representations of Functions and Imbedding Theorems (Nauka, Moscow, 1975; V. H. Winston & Sons, New York, Vol. I, 1978; Vol. II, 1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M. Costabel and F. Le Louër, “Shape derivatives of boundary integral operators in electromagnetic scattering. I: Shape differentiability of pseudo-homogeneous boundary integral operators,” Integral Equations Oper. Theory 72, 509 (2012).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    C. J. Earle and S. Mitra, “Variation of moduli under holomorphic motions,” Contemporary Mathematics 256, 39 (2000).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    P. R. Garabedian and M. Schiffer, “Convexity of domain functionals,” J. Anal.Math., 281 (1953).

  7. 7.

    V. I. Gorbachuk and A. V. Knyazyuk, “Boundary values of solutions of operator-differential equations,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 44 (3), 55 (1989) [Russ. Math. Surv. 44, 67 (1989)].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    H. Groemer, Geometric Applications of Fourier Series and Spherical Harmonics / Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. V. 61. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996).

  9. 9.

    A. Henrot and M. Pierre, Variation et Optimisation de Formes. Une Analyse Géométrique (Springer, Berlin, 2005).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    D. Henry, Perturbation of the Boundary in Boundary-Value Problems of Partial Differential Equations (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear PartialDifferentialOperators. I. Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983; Mir,Moscow, 1986).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    B. Hu and D. P. Nicholls, “Analyticity of Dirichlet–Neumann operators on Hölder and Lipschitz domains,” SIAM J. Math. Anal. 37, 302 (2005).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    B. Hu and D. P. Nicholls, “The domain of analyticity of Dirichlet–Neumann operators,” Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A,Math. 140, 367 (2010).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    D. S. Jerison C. E. Kenig, “Boundary behavior of harmonic functions in non-tangentially accessible domains,” Adv. Math. 46, 80 (1982).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    J. Kautský, “Approximation of solutions of Dirichlet’s problem on nearly circular domains and their application in numerical methods,” Apl. Mat. 7, 186 (1962).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    L. V. Kantorovich and V. I. Krylov, Approximate Methods of Higher Analysis (Gosudarstv. Izdat. Tekhn.-Teor. Lit., Moscow–Leningrad, 1950; P. Noordhoff Ltd., Groningen, 1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    V. I. Kolyada, “Inequalities of Gagliardo–Nirenberg type and estimates for the moduli of continuity,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 60, 139 (2005) [Russ. Math. Surv. 60, 1147 (2005)].

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    H. Komatsu, “An elementary theory of hyperfunctions and microfunctions,” Partial Differential Equations. Part 1. Banach Center Publications 27, 233 (Polish Academy of Sciences,Warszawa: 1992).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    V. A. Kozlov and V. G. Maz'ya, “Estimates of L p-means and asymptotics of solutions of elliptic boundary value problems in a cone. II: Operators with variable coefficients,” Math. Nachr. 137, 113 (1988).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    A Kufner, “On the dependence of the solution to theDirichlet problemon a change of the domain of definition,” Apl. Mat. 6, 263 (1961).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    M. Lanza de Cristoforis, “A functional decomposition theorem for the conformal representation,” J. Math. Soc. Japan 49, 759 (1997).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    M. Lanza de Cristoforis, “A domain perturbation problem for the Poisson equation,” Complex Variables Theory Appl. 50, 851 (2005).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    M. Lanza de Cristoforis and L. Rossi, “Real analytic dependence of simple and double layer potentials upon perturbation of the support and of the density,” J. Integral Equations Appl. 16, 137 (2004).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    R. S. Laugesen and B. A. Siudeja, “Magnetic spectral bounds on starlike plane domains,” ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 21, 670 (2015).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    M. A. Lavrent'ev, Conformal Mappings with Applications to Some Problems of Mechanics (OGIZ, Moscow, 1946) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    J. L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications (Mir, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    J. L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications. Vol. III (Springer-Verlag, Berlin etc., 1973).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Y. Meyer and R. Coifman, Wavelets. Calderón–Zygmund and Multilinear Operators (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    A. I. Parfenov, “Weighted a priori estimate in straightenable domains of local Lyapunov–Dini type,” Sib. Èlektron. Mat. Izv. 9, 65 (2012).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    A. I. Parfenov, “Error bound for a generalized M. A. Lavrentiev’s formula via the norm in a fractional Sobolev space,” Sib. Èlektron. Mat. Izv. 10, 335 (2013).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    G. Pólya and G. Szegö, Isoperimetric Inequalities inMathematical Physics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1951; GIFML,Moscow, 1962).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    R. Potthast and I. G. Stratis, “On the domain derivative for scattering by impenetrable obstacles in chiral media,” IMA J. Appl.Math. 68, 621 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    P. Quittner and Ph. Souplet, Superlinear Parabolic Problems. Blow-up, Global Existence and Steady States (Birkhäuser, Basel etc., 2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    I. B. Simonenko, “A new general method of investigating linear operator equations of singular integral equation type. I,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 29 567 (1965).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    J. W. Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), Theory of Sound (MacMillan, London, 1926; GITTL, Moscow–Leningrad, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    G. Szegö, “The virtual mass of nearly spherical solids,” Duke Math. J. 16, 209 (1949).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    I. E. Verbitsky, “Superlinear equations, potential theory and weighted norm inequalities,” Nonlinear Analysis, Function Spaces and Applications. Proc. of the Spring School (Prague, Czech Repub., 1998). Eds. M. Krbec et al. 6, 223. (Acad. Sci. Czech Repub., Prague, 1999). V. 6. P. 223–269.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    H. Whitney, “Analytic extensions of differentiable functions defined in closed sets,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 36, 63 (1934).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Parfenov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.I. Parfenov, 2017, published in Matematicheskie Trudy, 2017, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 158–200.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parfenov, A.I. Series in a Lipschitz perturbation of the boundary for solving the Dirichlet problem. Sib. Adv. Math. 27, 274–304 (2017).

Download citation


  • positive harmonic function
  • conformal mapping
  • Lipschitz continuous perturbation of the boundary