Skip to main content
Log in

The study of heterogeneity of 16S rRNA gene and groESL operone in DNA samples of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia muris, and “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” determined in Ixodes persulcatus ticks on the territory of Ural, Siberia and Far East of Russia

  • Experimental Works
  • Published:
Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 3552 Ixodes persulcatus from Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, Novosibirsk, Irkutsk regions and Khabarovsk Territory were examined on the Ehrlichia and Anaplasma presence by nested PCR based on the 16S rRNA gene. Both Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia muris DNA were found in I. persulcatus in all studied regions — A. phagocytophilum was detected in 1.3–6.3% of ticks and E. muris — in 2.0–14.1% of ticks. Moreover, “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” DNA was found in 8 ticks collected in Novosibirsk, Irkutsk Regions and Khabarovsk Territory. Partial nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA gene and groESL operone (1240–1300 bp) were determined for 65 samples of A. phagocytophilum, 17 samples of E. muris and 4 samples of “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”. Nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA gene and groESL operone of E. muris and “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” were shown to be highly conservative, and nucleotide sequences of groESL operone of both E. muris and “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” differed from the sequences found previously in other species of Ixodid tick. On the basis of analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and groESL operone sequences it was concluded that all revealed samples A. phagocytophilum could be divided into 2 groups. GroESL operone sequences of A. phagocytophilum from the first group were identical to each other but significantly differed from the known groESL operone sequences (less than 98.2% of similarity), whereas their 16S rRNA gene sequences were identical to the sequence of widely distributed and pathogenic for human A. phagocytophilum genetic variant (CAHU-HGE1, GenBank AF093788) or differed from it by a single nucleotide substitution. The nucleotide sequences of groESL operone of A. phagocytophilum from the second group differed from each other by 1–4 nucleotides and were closely related (99.2–99.4% of similarity) to the sequences of groESL operone of A. phagocytophilum isolates found in Europe in Ixodes ricinus and roe deer. The nucleotide sequences of the 16S rRNA gene of A. phagocytophilum from the second group were most similar to the sequence of the rare A. phagocytophilum genetic variant previously found only in China (GenBank DQ342324).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afanasieva, M.V., Vorob’eva, N.N., Korenberg, E.I., et al., Infekts. Bol., 2006, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grigoryan, Y.V., Korenberg, E.I., Vorob’eva, N.N., et al., Epid. Infekts. Bol., 2000, no. 6, pp. 20–23.

  3. Kozlova, I.V., Zlobin, V.I., Verkhozina, M.M., et al., Byul. VSNTs SO RAMN, 2007, no. 3, suppl., pp. 112–116.

  4. Rar, V.A., Pukhovskaya, N.M., Vysochina, N.P., et al., Byul. VSNTs SO RAMN, 2007, no. 3, suppl., pp. 156–159.

  5. Rar, V.A., Fomenko, N.V., Mel’nikova, O.V., and Chernousova N.Ja., Byu. Sib. Med., 2008, vol. 7,suppl. 1, pp. 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Semenov, A.V., Alekseev, A.N., Dubinina, Ye.V., et al., Med. Parazitol., 2001, no. 3, pp. 11–15.

  7. Sidel’nikov, Yu.N., Mediannikov, O.Yu., Ivanov, L.I., and Zdanovskaya, N.I., Klin. Med., 2003, no. 2, pp. 67–68.

  8. Telford, S.R., 3rd, Korenberg, E.I., Goethhert, H.K., et al., Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol., 2002, no. 6, pp. 21–25.

  9. Shpynov, S.N., Rudakov, N.V., Yastrebov, V.K., et al., Med. Parazitol., 2004, no. 2, pp. 10–14.

  10. Alberti, A., Addis, M.F., Sparagano, O., et al., Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2005, vol. 11, pp. 1322–1324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alekseev, A.N., Dubinina, H.V., Van de Pol, I., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2001, vol. 39, pp. 2237–2342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao, W.C., Zhao, Q.M., Zhang, P.H., et al., Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 2003, vol. 68, pp. 547–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao, W.C., Zhan, L., He, J., et al., Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 2006, vol.75, pp. 664–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, S.M., Dumler, J.S., Bakken, J.S., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1994, vol. 32, pp. 589–595.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dumler, J.S., Madigan, J.E., Pusterla, N., and Bakken, J.S., Clin. Infect. Dis., 2007, vol. 45,suppl. 1, pp. 545–551.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fehr, J.S., Bloemberg, G.V., Ritter, C., et al., Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2010, vol. 16., pp. 1127–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawahara, M., Ito, T., Suto, C., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1999, vol. 37, pp. 1123–1129.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawahara, M., Rikihisa, Y., Isogai, E., et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2004, vol. 54, pp. 1837–1843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, C.M., Kim, M.S., Park, M.S., et al., Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis., 2003, vol. 3, pp. 17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liz, J.S., Anderes, L., Sumner, J.W., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2000, vol. 38, pp. 1002–1007.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Massung, R.F., Mauel, M.J., Owens, J.H., et al., Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2002, vol. 8, pp. 467–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Massung, R.F., Priestley, R.A., Miller, N.J., et al., J. Infect. Dis., 2003, vol. 188, pp. 1757–1763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohashi, N., Inayoshi, M., Kitamura, K., et al., Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2005, vol. 11, pp. 1780–1783.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Parola, P., Davoust, B., Raoult, D., et al., Vet. Res., 2005, vol. 36, pp. 469–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravyn, M.D., Korenberg, E.I., Oeding, J.A., et al. Lancet, 1999, vol. 353, pp. 722–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schouls, L.M., van de Pol, I., Rijpkema, S.G., and Schot, C.S., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1999, vol. 37, pp. 2215–2222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Spitalská, E., Boldis, V., Kostanová, Z., et al., Acta Virol., 2008, vol. 52, pp. 175–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stuen, S., Moum, T., Petrovec, M., and Schouls, L.M., Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 2006, vol. 296, pp. 164–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sumner, J.W., Nicholson, W.L., and Massung, R.F., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1997, vol. 35, pp. 2087–2092.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Takano, A., Ando, S., Kishimoto, T., et al., Microbiol. Immunol., 2009, vol. 53, pp. 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. von Loewenich, F.D., Geissdörfer, W., Disqué, C., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2010, vol. 48, pp. 2630–2635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Welinder-Olsson, C., Kjellin, E., Vaht, K., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2010, vol. 48, pp. 1956–1959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wen, B., Rikihisa, Y., Mott, J., et al., Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1995, vol. 45, pp. 250–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Rar.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.A. Rar, T.I. Epikhina, N.N. Livanova, V.V. Panov, E.K. Doroschenko, N.M. Pukhovskaya, N.P. Vysochina, L.I. Ivanov, 2011, published in Molekulyarnaya Genetika, Mikrobiologiya i Virusologiya, 2011, No. 2, pp. 17–23.

The article was translated by the authors.

About this article

Cite this article

Rar, V.A., Epikhina, T.I., Livanova, N.N. et al. The study of heterogeneity of 16S rRNA gene and groESL operone in DNA samples of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia muris, and “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” determined in Ixodes persulcatus ticks on the territory of Ural, Siberia and Far East of Russia. Mol. Genet. Microbiol. Virol. 26, 66–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0891416811020091

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0891416811020091

Keywords

Navigation