Skip to main content
Log in

Features of the Ionospheric Storm on December 21–24, 2016

  • SPACE PHYSICS
  • Published:
Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to investigate the response of the F region and topside ionosphere to the moderate geomagnetic storm on December 21, 2016 (Kp max= 6). The subject of the study is the height–time variations in the parameters of the ionospheric plasma over Kharkiv. Experimental data were obtained using vertical sounding and incoherent scatter methods by the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar. The presented results are based on the correlation analysis of the incoherent scattered signal. The ion and electron temperatures, as well as the ionospheric plasma velocity, were determined from a set of measured correlation functions of the incoherently scattered signal. The electron density was calculated using the following parameters measured for a number of ionospheric heights: power of the incoherent scatter signal, ion and electron temperatures, and the electron density at the ionospheric F2 layer peak, which is calculated from the critical frequency measured by the ionosonde. The moderate geomagnetic storm was accompanied by an ionospheric storm over Kharkiv with sign-variable phases (first positive and second negative). The peak increase in the electron density was 1.8 times and decrease was 3.4 times. The negative phase was accompanied by a slight rise of the F2 layer (by 20–28 km), which could be due to a decrease in the vertical component of the plasma velocity and an increase in the electron temperature by 600–800 K and ion temperature by 100–160 K. Effects of strong negative ionospheric disturbances were registered during the subsequent magnetospheric disturbance of December 22–24, 2016, with a decrease in electron density at the F2 layer peak up to 2.5–4.9 times. The effects of negative disturbances manifested themselves in the variations of temperatures of electrons and ions. In general, the moderate magnetic storm caused significant changes in the electron density in the ionospheric F2 layer peak, which were accompanied by heating of the ionospheric plasma as well as changes in variations of the vertical component of the ionospheric plasma velocity and the height of ionization during the main phase of the magnetic storm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. D. Danilov and L. D. Morozova, “Ionospheric storms in F2-layer. Morphology and physics (review),” Geomagn. Aeron. 25, 705–721 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. D. Danilov, L. D. Morozova, and E. G. Mirmovich, “On the possible nature of the positive phase of ionospheric storms,” Geomagn. Aeron. 25, 768–772 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Ya. Emelyanov, S. V. Katsko, and L. F. Chernogor, “Features of the geospace storm effects on December 21–24, 2016,” in Proc. 17th Ukr. Conf. on Space Research, Odessa, Ukraine, Aug. 21–25, 2017 (2017).

  4. I. O. Kremenetskii and O. K. Cheremnykh, Space Weather: Mechanism and Manifestations (Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 2009) [in Ukrainian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. F. Chernogor, “Physics of Earth, atmosphere, and geospace from the standpoint of system paradigm,” Radiofiz. Radioastron. 8, 59–106 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. F. Chernogor, “Earth–atmosphere–ionosphere–magnetosphere as an open dynamic nonlinear physical system,” Nelineinyi Mir 4, 655–697 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. F. Chernogor and I. F. Domnin, Physics of Geospace Storms: Monograph (Khark. Nats. Univ. im. V. N. Karazina, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2014) [in Russian].

  8. P. P. Ban, S. J. Sun, C. Chen, and Z. W. Zhao, “Forecasting of low-latitude storm-time ionospheric foF2 using support vector machine,” Radio Sci. 46, 1–9 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RS004633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. V. Blagoveshchenskii, “Effect of geomagnetic storms (substorms) on the ionosphere: 1. A review,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 53, 275–290 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793213030031

  10. M. J. Buonsanto, “Ionospheric storms: A review,” Space Sci. Rev. 88, 563–601 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. F. Chernogor, Ye. I. Grigorenko, V. N. Lysenko, and V. I. Taran, “Dynamic processes in the ionosphere during magnetic storms from the Kharkov incoherent scatter radar observations,” Int. J. Geomagn. Aeron. 7, GI3001 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GI000125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. F. Chernogor, “The Earth–atmosphere–geospace system: Main properties and processes,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 32, 3199–3218 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541510

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. D. Danilov, “F2-region response to geomagnetic disturbances,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 63, 441–449 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. P. Goncharenko, J. C. Foster, A. J. Coster, C. Huang, N. Aponte, and L. J. Paxton, “Observations of a positive storm phase on September 10, 2005,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 69, 1253–1272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.09.011

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Mikhailov and J. C. Foster, “Daytime thermosphere above Millstone Hill during severe geomagnetic storm,” J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 102, 17275–17282 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA00879

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Ya. Yemelyanov, “Radio physical observations of plasma drift velocities in the ionosphere near the maximum of solar cycle 24,” Telecommun. Radio Eng. 74, 1841–1855 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1615/TelecomRadEng.v74.i20.60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. V. Katsko, L. Ya. Emelyanov or L. F. Chernogor.

Additional information

Translated by O. Pismenov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katsko, S.V., Emelyanov, L.Y. & Chernogor, L.F. Features of the Ionospheric Storm on December 21–24, 2016. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 37, 85–95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321020045

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591321020045

Keywords:

Navigation