Skip to main content
Log in

Polarimetry of the E-type asteroid 64 Angelina

  • Dynamics and Physics of Bodies of the Solar System
  • Published:
Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results of polarimetric observations of a high-albedo asteroid 64 Angelina obtained in the phase-angle range from 0.8° to 24.3° are presented. The observations were carried out in the period from September 28 to October 9, 2008, and on November 15, 2011, and September 18, 2012, with the 1.25-m and 2.6-m telescopes of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory equipped with a five-color double-beam photopolarimeter and a single-channel photometer-polarimeter, respectively. Our observations confirm the polarimetric opposition effect in asteroid 64 Angelina at small phase angles and well agree with the other observations. The obtained results are discussed in terms of the currently available models of the light scattering by regolith surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Berdyugin and N. M. Shakhovskoi, “The technique for simultaneous measurements of four Stokes parameters in the UBVRI bands,” Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Obs. 87, 122–134 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. M. Shakhovskoi and Yu. S. Efimov, “Polarization observations of nonstationary stars and extragalactic objects. I. The instruments and technique for observations and their processing,” Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Obs. 45, 90–110 (1972).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. G. Shkuratov, “The diffraction mechanism of the opposition effect of brightness of the complex-structure surfaces,” Kin. Fiz. Nebes. Tel 4(5), 33–38 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. I. N. Belskaya, N. N. Kiselev, Yu. N. Krugly, et al., “Opposition polarimetry and photometry of S and E-type asteroids,” Icarus 166(2), 276–284 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. H. Burbine, E. A. Cloutis, S. F. Bus, et al., “The detection of troilite (FeS) on the surfaces of E-class asteroids,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 30, 1025 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. E. Clark, S. J. Bus, A. S. Rivkin, et al., “E-type asteroid spectroscopy and compositional modeling,” J. Geophys. Res. 109(E2), E02001 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Durech, M. Kaasalainen, D. Herald, et al., “Combining asteroid models derived by lightcurve inversion with asteroidal occultation silhouettes,” Icarus 214(2), 652–670 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Fornasier, A. Mogliorini, E. Dotto, and M. A. Barucci, “Visible and near infrared spectroscopic investigation of E-type asteroids, including 2867 Steins, a target of the Rosetta Mission,” Icarus 196(1), 119–134 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Gaffey and M. S. Kelley, “Mineralogical variations among high E-type asteroids: Implications for asteroid igneous processes,” in Proc. Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf. XXXV, League City, 2004 (League City, Texas, 2004), abstract 1812.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. W. Harris, J. W. Young, L. Contreiras et al., “Phase relations of high albedo asteroids: The unusual opposition brightening of 44 Nysa and 64 Angelina,” Icarus 81(2), 365–374 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. -C. Hsu and M. Breger, “On standard polarized stars,” Astrophys. J. 262(1), 732–738 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. N. Kiselev, N. M. Shakhovskoj, and Yu. S. Efimov, “On the polarization opposition effect of E-type asteroid 64 Angelina,” Icarus 120(2), 408–411 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Lumme and K. Muinonen, “A two-parameters system for linear polarization of some Solar System objects,” in Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, Ed. by A. W. Harris and E. Bowell (Lunar and Planet. Inst., Houston, 1993), pp. 194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. I. Mishchenko, “On the nature of the polarization opposition effect exhibited by Saturn’s rings,” Astrophys. J. 411(1), 351–361 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. I. Mishchenko and J. M. Dlugach, “Coherent backscatter and the opposition effect for E-type asteroids,” Planet. Space Sci. 41(3), 173–181 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. I. Mishchenko, V. K. Rosenbush, and N. N. Kiselev, “Weak localization of electromagnetic waves and opposition phenomena exhibited by high-albedo atmosphereless Solar System objects,” Appl. Opt. 45(8), 4459–4463 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Piirola, “A double image chopping polarimeter,” Astron. Astrophys. 27, 383–388 (1973).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. V. Piirola, “Simultaneous five-color (UBVRI) photopolarimeter,” in Radiation of Circumstellar Origin, Ed. by G. V. Coyne, A. M. Magalhaes, A. F. Moffat, R. E. Schulte-Ladbeck, and S. Tapia (Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State, 1988), pp. 735–746.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Poutanen, “UBV photometry of asteroid 64 Angelina,” in Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, Ed. by C. I. Lagerkvist and H. Rickman (Universitet Reprocentralen, Uppsala, 1983), pp. 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. K. Rosenbush, N. N. Koselev, V. G. Shevchenko, et al., “Polarization and brightness opposition effects for the E-type asteroid 64 Angelina,” Icarus 178(2), 222–234 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. K. Rosenbush, V. G. Shevchenko, N. N. Kiselev, et al., “Polarization and brightness opposition effects for the E-type asteroid 44 Nysa,” Icarus 201(2), 655–665 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Serkowski, “Polarimeters for optical astronomy,” in Planets, Stars, and Nebulae Studied with Photopolarimetry, Ed. by T. Gehrels, (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1974), pp. 135–174.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. K. Shepard, A. W. Harris, P. A. Taylor, et al., “Radar observations of asteroids 64 Angelina and 69 Hesperia,” Icarus 215(2), 547–551 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. G. Shevchenko and E. F. Tedesco, “Asteroid albedos deduced from stellar occultations,” Icarus 184(1), 211–220 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. F. Tedesco, J. G. Williams, D. L. Matson, et al., “Three-parameter asteroid taxonomic classifications,” in Asteroids II, Ed. by R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, and M. S. Matthews (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1989), pp. 1151–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. J. Tholen, “Asteroid taxonomic classification,” in Asteroids II, Ed. by R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, and M. S. Matthews (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1989), pp. 1139–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Zellner, T. Gehrels, and J. Gradie, “Minor planets and related objects. XVI. Polarimetric diameters,” Astron. J., 1100–1110 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Zellner and J. Gradie, “Minor planets and related objects. XX. Polarimetric evidence for the albedos and compositions of 94 asteroids,” Astron. J. 81, 262–280 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Zaitsev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.V. Zaitsev, N.N. Kiselev, V.K. Rosenbush, S.V. Kolesnikov, K.A. Antonyuk, 2014, published in Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel, 2014, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 71–80.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaitsev, S.V., Kiselev, N.N., Rosenbush, V.K. et al. Polarimetry of the E-type asteroid 64 Angelina. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 30, 155–160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591314030064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591314030064

Keywords

Navigation