Skip to main content
Log in

The 1970 Dagestan Earthquake a Half-Century Later

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In connection with the 50th anniversary of the destructive Dagestan earthquake on May 14, 1970, information on the parameters, manifestation features, and consequences of this seismic event was collected and summarized. The Dagestan earthquake became a very important event in the seismic history of the entire Caucasus. The reasons for this were determined by several of its features, the most important being that it was the strongest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the Caucasus at that time, and the nearest seismic station, Makhachkala, was at an epicentral distance of less than 30 km and recorded not only the main shock, but also a strong foreshock with its aftershock sequence. After the earthquake, a temporary seismic network was quickly deployed, which made it possible to trace in detail the development of the aftershock process of the main shock. Based on the literature data, the main parameters of the Dagestan earthquake and its most important consequences are discussed. The most realistic model of the source was constructed by S.S. Arefiev et al. (2004) based on data on the inversion of body waves from this earthquake. According to this model, Dagestan earthquake had a multiple source consisting of three subsources. The initial rupture (subsource), with a horizontal extent of 14 km, was located in the center of the focal zone at a depth of 9 km. The second rupture began about 2 s later, 10 km east of the first, at a depth of about 10 km and with a horizontal extent of 20 km. The third subsource was 10 km west of the first, at a depth of 12 km. The Dagestan earthquake made it possible to significantly refine the regional seismic hazard assessment. This was extremely important in regards to construction of the Chirkey hydroelectric power plant (HPP) with a high-altitude dam (232 m) in the 8-point shaking intensity zone for this seismic event. The creation of the reservoir itself during the construction of the high-pressure concrete dam of the HPP led to the impact of its filling and further seasonal fluctuations in the volume of the reservoir (about 3 billion m3) on the seismic activity in the upper part of the crust, with an area of at least 1000 km2. This was the reason for the occurrence of induced technogenic earthquakes in this area. The effect of induced seismicity can be dangerous if completion of the dam and creation of the reservoir coincide in time with the natural rhythm of ordinary seismogenesis. It also turned out that powerful shaking of the upper part of the crust during the Dagestan earthquake disrupted the oil production regime in Dagestan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

REFERENCES

  1. Aliev, I.A. and Magomedov, A.G., Variations of seismic activity in Dagestan as a result of tectonic and anthropogenic manifestations, Tr. Inst. Geol. Dagestan. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2020, no. 1, pp. 52–62. https://doi.org/10.33580/2541-9684-2020-64-1-52-61

  2. Aptekman, Zh.Ya. and Shirokova, E.I., Focal mechanism, Dagestanskoe zemletryasenie 14 maya 1970 g (The May 14, 1970 Dagestan Earthquake), Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arefev, S.S., Stasyuk, E.I., and Rivera, L., Source model of the Dagestan, 1970 earthquake, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2004, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balakina, L.M. and Moskvina, A.G., Large earthquakes east of the Northern Caucasus: Focal mechanisms and their geological interpretation, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 1997, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 358–371.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balakina, L.M., Zakharova, A.I., Moskvina, A.G., and Chepkunas, L.S., Relation of focal mechanisms to regional geological structure, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 1996, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 204–223.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dagestanskoe zemletryasenie 14 maya 1970 g.: Seismologiya. Geologiya. Geofizika (The May 14, 1970 Dagestan Earthquak: Seismology, Geology, Geophysics), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

  7. Dagestanskoe zemletryasenie 14 maya 1970 g.: Razrushitel’nye posledstviya. Inzhenernaya seismologiya. Voprosy seismostoikogo stroitel’stva (The May 14, 1970 Dagestan Earthquake: Devastating Consequences: Engineering Seismology, Issues of Seismic-Resistant Civil Engineering), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

  8. Daniyalov, M.G. and Alieva, A.V., Analysis of possible emergencies consequences at hydro power plants reservoirs and dams in the Republic of Dagestan, Monitoring. Nauka Tekhnol., 2018, no. 2, pp. 6–11.

  9. Jackson, J.A. and McKenzie, D.P., Active tectonics of the Alpine-Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan, Geophys. J. Int., 1984, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 185–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01931.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuznetsova, K.I., Aptekman, Zh.Ya., Shebalin, N.V., and Shteinberg, V.V., Aftershocks of residual effect and aftershocks of development of the source zone of the Dagestan earthquake, Issledovaniya po fizike zemletryasenii (Studies on the Physics of Earthquakes), Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levkovich, R.A. and Amirov, S.R., Seismicity of the seismofocal area of Dagestan Wedge and its adjacent encirclements for historical and instrumental periods of observations before the May 14, 1970 earhtquake, Monitoring. Nauka Tekhnol., 2010, no. 2, pp. 42–46.

  12. Levkovich, R.A., Deinega, G.I., Kasparov, S.A., Idarmachev, Sh.G., Kazar’yants, G.S., Deinega, A.G., and Omarov, G.N., Geodinamicheskii effekt sozdaniya krupnykh vodokhranilishch v seismoaktivnykh oblastyakh (Geodynamic Effect of Creation of Large Water Reservoirs in Seismically Active Areas), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.

  13. Magidov, S.Kh., Anthropogenic impact in the area of Shamkhal-Bulaksky gas-condensate field and the 1970 Dagestan earthquake, Monitoring i prognozirovanie prirodnykh katastrof. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii k 40-letiyu Dagestanskogo zemletryaseniya 14 maya 1970 g. (Monitoring and Forecasting of Natural Disasters: Proc. Sci.-Pract. Conf. Dedicated to the 40th Anniversary of the May 14, 1970 Dagestan earthquake, Makhachkala, 2010, pp. 90–94.

  14. Marchuk, A.N. and Marchuk, N.A., Types and rates of hydrogeodynamic precursors development in drainage regime of high dam foundations, Geoekologiya. Inzh. Geol., Gidrogeologiya, Geokriologiya, 2018, no. 5, pp. 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1134/S086978031805006X

  15. Milanovskii, E.E., Noveishaya tektonika Kavkaza (Recent Tectonics of Caucasus), Moscow: Nedra, 1968.

  16. Mirzoev, K.M., Nikolaev, A.V., Lukk, A.A., Deshcherevskii, A.V., Mirzoev, V.K., and Kharlamov, A.I., Enhancing the oil yield of formations and the oil extraction by means of reducing the volume of water pumping and vibration taking into account the tidal movements of the Earth, Fundamental’nye problemy razrabotki mestorozhdenii nefti i gaza (Fundamental Problems of Development of Oil and Gas Fields), Moscow, 2011, Moscow: Inst. Probl. Nefti i Gaza Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011, pp. 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rossiiskii seismologicheskii illyustrirovannyi kalendar’ 2008–2009 (Russian Seismological Illustrated Calendar for 2008–2009), Nikonov, A.A. and Sidorin, A.Ya., Eds., Moscow: Inst. Fiz. Zemli Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saidov, O.A. and Suleimanov, A.I., Dynamics of seismicity of the Chirkey-Irganay area of Sulak cascade of hydropower plants, Monitoring. Nauka Tekhnol., 2013, no. 3, pp. 6–12.

  19. Shebalin, N.V. and Rustanovich, D.N., Focal model of the Dagestan earthquake, Dagestanskoe zemletryasenie 14 maya 1970 g. (The May 14, 1970 Dagestan Earthquake), Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sholpo, V.N., Rogozhin, E.A., and Goncharov, M.A., Skladchatost’ Bol’shogo Kavkaza (Faulting of the Great Caucasus), Moscow: Nauka, 1993.

  21. Ulomov, V.I. and Shumilina, L.S., Komplekt kart obshchego seismicheskogo raionirovaniya territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii - OSR-97. Masshtab 1 : 8 000 000. Ob”yasnitel’naya zapiska i spisok gorodov i naselennykh punktov, raspolozhennykh v seismoopasnykh raionakh (Map Collection of General Seismic Zoning of the Territory of the Russian Federation OSR-97: Scale 1 : 8 000 000: Explanatory Note and the List of Cities and Settlements Located in Seismically Hazardous Areas), Moscow: Ob”edinennyi Inst. Fiz. Zemli Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1999.

  22. Yakovlev, F.L., Stakhovskaya, R.Yu., and Gabsatarova, I.P., On the periodicity of manifestations of the seismicity of Dagestan and its neighborhood in the 19th–21st centuries, Struktura, veshchestvennyi sostav, svoistva, sovremennaya geodinamika i seismichnost’ platformennykh territorii i sopredel’nykh regionov. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi Shchukinskoi konferentsii (Structure, Elemental Composition, Properties, and Recent Geodynamics and Seismicity of Platform Territories and Neighboring Regions: Proc. All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Shchukin Conf.), Voronezh, 2020, Voronezh: Voronezh. Gos. Univ., 2020, pp. 405–410.

  23. Zakharova, A.I., Moskvina, A.G., and Chepkunas, L.S., Focal parameters of Dagestan earthquake of 14 May 1970, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 1990, vol. 26, no. 1-6, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The results presented in the article were obtained as part of the work of the FMWU-2022-0010 project under the state task of the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ya. Sidorin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lukk, A.A., Sidorin, A.Y. The 1970 Dagestan Earthquake a Half-Century Later. Seism. Instr. 58 (Suppl 1), S123–S134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923922070155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923922070155

Keywords:

Navigation