Skip to main content
Log in

On the Problem of Deep Earthquakes in Crimea–Black Sea Region

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is a common opinion that only crustal earthquakes can occur in the Crimea–Black Sea region. Since the existence of deep earthquakes in the Crimea–Black Sea region is extremely important for the construction of a geodynamic model for this region, an attempt is made to verify the validity of this widespread view. To do this, the coordinates of all earthquakes recorded by the stations of the Crimean seismological network are reinterpreted with an algorithm developed by one of the authors. The data published in the seismological catalogs and bulletins of the Crimea–Black Sea region for 1970–2012 are used for the analysis. To refine the coordinates of hypocenters of earthquakes in the Crimea–Black Sea region, in addition to the data from stations of the Crimean seismological network, information from seismic stations located around the Black Sea coast are used. In total, the data from 61 seismic stations were used to determine the hypocenter coordinates. The used earthquake catalogs for 1970–2012 contain information on ~2140 events with magnitudes from–1.5 to 5.5. The bulletins provide information on the arrival times of P- and S-waves at seismic stations for 1988 events recorded by three or more stations. The principal innovation of this study is the use of the original author’s hypocenter determination algorithm, which minimizes the functional of distances between the points (X, Y, H) and (x, y, h) corresponding to the theoretical and observed seismic wave travel times from the earthquake source to the recording stations. The determination of the coordinates of earthquake hypocenters is much more stable in this case than the usual minimization of the residual functional for the arrival time of an earthquake wave at a station (the difference between the theoretical and observed values). Since determination of the hypocenter coordinates can be influenced by the chosen velocity column beneath each station, special attention is focused on collecting information on velocity profiles. To evaluate the influence of the upper mantle on the results of calculating the velocity model, two different low-velocity and high-velocity models are used; the results are compared with each other. Both velocity models are set to a depth of 640 km, which is fundamentally important in determining hypocenters for deep earthquakes. Studies of the Crimea–Black Sea region have revealed more than 70 earthquakes with a source depth of more than 60 km. The adequacy of the obtained depth values is confirmed by the results of comparing the initial experimental data from the bulletins with the theoretical travel-time curves for earthquake sources with depths of 50 and 200 km. The sources of deep earthquakes found in the Crimea–Black Sea region significantly change our understanding of the structure and geotectonics of this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baranova, E.P., Egorova, T.P., and Omel’chenko, V.D., DSS seismic data reinterpretation and gravity simulation along the profiles 25, 28, and 29 in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov, Geofiz. Zh., 2008, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 124–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Sea Earthquake Safety Net-ESNET Project, Country assessment report Republic of Moldova. http://esnet.infp.ro/content/Moldova_CARReport_ISM.pdf. Cited June 31, 2012.

  • Bulanzhe, Yu.D., Muratov, M.V., Subbotin, S.I., et al., Zemnaya kora i istoriya razvitiya Chernomorskoi vpadiny (Earth’s Crust and Evolution of the Black Sea Basin), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmin, V.Yu., A new approach to determining hypocentral parameters of close earthquakes, Vulkanol. Seismol., 1992, no. 3, pp. 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmin, V.Yu., P wave velocity in the mantle, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2004, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmin, V.Yu. and Shumlyanskaya, L.A., Contemporary seismicity of Crimea, Vopr. Inzh. Seismol., 2015, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.-J., van der Lee, S., and Flanagan, M.P., A new P-velocity model for the Tethyan margin from a scaled Svelocity model and the inversion of P and PKP delay times, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2012, vols. 210–211, pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekrem, Z., Tomographic evidence of slab detachment beneath eastern Turkey and the Caucasus, Geophys. J. Int., 2008, vol. 175, no. 3. P. 1273–1282. doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03946.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Mediterranean Seismological Centre (Centre Sismologique Euro-Méditerranéen European Mediterranean), Station information ISC and USGS. http://www.emsc-csem.org/Bulletin/station.php. Cited December 31, 2015.

  • Fan, G., Walace, T.C., and Zhao, D., Tomographic imaging of deep velocity structure beneath the Eastern and Southern Carpathians, Romania: Implications for continental collision, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1998, vol. 103, no. B2, pp. 2705–2723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiko, V.S., Tsvetkova, T.A., Sannikova, N.P., Livanova, L.P., and Geiko, K.V., Regional 3D structure of the mantle beneath Northwest Eurasia. I. Europe, Geofiz. Zh., 1998, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 67–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgieva, G.D., Crustal and upper mantle structure in the southern part of the Moesian platform obtained by data from seismic stations MPE, PVL and SZH, Bulg. Chem. Commun., 2015, vol. 47, spec. is. B, pp. 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobarenko, V.C., Egorova, T.P., and Stifenson, R., Crustal structure of the Kerch Peninsula and northeastern Black Sea from the results of local seismic tomography, Geofiz. Zh., 2014, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurbüz, C., Bekler, T., Toksoz, M.N., Kuleli, S., Kalafat, D., and Schultz, C.A. Seismic refraction studies and crustal structure in Anatolia. http://www.geophys.geos.vt.edu/hole/ccss/gurbuzCCSS.pdf. Cited December 31, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu, C., Romanian Seismic Network (FDSN Report 2004), International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. https://www.fdsn.org/media/meetings/2004/Romania_FDSN_2004.pdf. Cited December 31, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Bogaziçi University, List of seismic stations. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/2/seismic-network/seismic-station-list/. Cited December 31, 2015.

  • Kind, R., Eken, T., Tilmann, F., Sodoudi, F., Taymaz, T., Bulut, F., Yuan, X., Can, B., and Schneider, F., Thickness of the lithosphere beneath Turkey and surroundings from S-receiver functions, Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 971–984. doi 10.5194/se-6-971-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kömeç Mutlu, A., Imaging the upper mantle beneath Turkey and surrounding regions. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/jeofizik/w/tezler_pdf/ahu_mutlu_phd.pdf. Cited December 31, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özacar, A.A., Zandt, G., Gilbert, H., and Beck, S.L., Seismic images of crustal variations beneath the East Anatolian Plateau (Turkey) from teleseismic receiver functions, in Sedimentary Basin Tectonics from the Black Sea and Caucasus to the Arabian Platform, vol. 340 of Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., Sosson, M., Kaymakci, N., Stephenson, R.A., Bergerat, F., and Starostenko, V., Eds., London, 2010, pp. 485–496. doi 10.1144/SP340.2110.1144/SP340.21

    Google Scholar 

  • Porfir’ev, V.B., Sollogub, V.B., and Chekunov, A.V., Stroenie i neftegazonosnost’ severnoi chasti Chernogo morya i sopredel’nykh territorii (Structure and Petroleum Potential of the Northern Black Sea and Adjacent Areas), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raileanu, V., Tataru, D., and Grecu, B., Crustal models in Romania. I. Moesian platform, Roman. Rep. Phys., 2012a, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 539–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raileanu, V., Tataru, D., and Grecu, B., Crustal models in Romania. II. Moldavian platform and adjacent areas, Roman. J. Phys., 2012b, vol. 57, nos. 9–10, pp. 1438–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismologicheskii byulleten’ zapadnoi zony ESSN SSSR za 1970–1989 gody (Seismological Bulletin of the Western Zone of the USSR United System for Seismic Observations for 1970–1989), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1980–1992.

  • Seismologicheskii byulleten’ zapadnoi zony sistemy seismicheskikh nablyudenii Ukrainy i Moldovy za 1990 god (Seismological Bulletin of the Western Zone for 1990), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1994. Seismologicheskii byulleten’ Ukrainy za 1992–1996 gg. (Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for 1992–1996), Sevastopol: NPTs EKOSI-Gidrofizika, 1997. Seismologicheskii byulleten’ Ukrainy za 1993–2006 gg. (Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for 1993–2006), Simferopol, 1996–2008.

  • Seismologicheskii byulleten’ Ukrainy za 2003–2011 gg. (Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for 2003–2011), Sevastopol: NPTs EKOSI-Gidrofizika, 2005–2012.

  • Starostenko, V., Janik, T., Kolomiyets, K., Czuba, W., Sroda, P., Grad, M., Kovács, I., Stephenson, R., Lysynchuk, D., Thybo, H., Artemieva, I.M., Omelchenko, V., Gintov, O., Kutas, R., Gryn, D., et al., Seismic velocity model of the crust and upper mantle along profile PANCAKE across the Carpathians between the Pannonian Basin and the East European Craton, Tectonophysics, 2013, vol. 608, pp. 1049–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbotin, S.I., Sollogub, V.B., Lebedev, T.S., et al., Geofizicheskie issledovaniya territorii Ukrainy (Geophysical Studies in the Territory of Ukraine), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezel, T., Erduran, M., and Alptekin, Ö., Crustal shear wave velocity structure of Turkey by surface wave dispersion analysis, Ann. Geophys., 2007, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toksoz, M.N., Kuleli, S., Gurbz, C., Kalafat, D., Bekler, T., Zor, E., Yilmazer, M., Ogutcu, Z., Schultz, C.A., and Harris, D.B., Calibration of regional seismic stations in the Middle East with shots in Turkey. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/244150.pdf. Cited December 31, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanacore, E.A., Taymaz, T., and Saygin, E., Moho structure of the Anatolian Plate from receiver function analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 2013, vol. 193, pp. 329–337. doi 10.1093/gji/ggs107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, H. and Ozel, S., Crustal structure of the eastern part of Central Anatolia (Turkey), Turk. J. Earth Sci., 2008, vol. 18, pp. 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S., Biryol, C.B., Beck, S., Zandt, G., Taymaz, T., Adiyaman, H.E., and Özacar, A.A., 3-D crustal structure along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in North-Central Anatolia revealed by local earthquake tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 2012, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 819–849. doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05313.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemletryaseniya Ukrainy v 1991 g. (seismologicheskii byulleten’) (Earthquakes of Ukraine in 1991: Seismological Bulletin), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Yu. Burmin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.Yu. Burmin, L.A. Shumlyanskaya, 2017, published in Voprosy Inzhenernoi Seismologii, 2017, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 83–94.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burmin, V.Y., Shumlyanskaya, L.A. On the Problem of Deep Earthquakes in Crimea–Black Sea Region. Seism. Instr. 54, 362–371 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923918030052

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923918030052

Keywords

Navigation