Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of Social and Humanitarian Research

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract—

The problem of the demarcation of knowledge in the social sciences and humanities is considered. A comparison of the parameters of publication activity in the socio-humanitarian and engineering disciplines is carried out. Indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of research in the social sciences and humanities are listed, and the possibility of obtaining applied results in the framework of these studies is substantiated. The areas of life that they can influence are indicated, and an approach to measuring the impact of scientific research on society is proposed as an assessment of the effectiveness of social innovations by social indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Long-term program of fundamental scientific research in the Russian Federation (2021–2030) (approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 31, 2020 No. 3684-r).

  2. Guide for the national project “Science” (approved by the Presidium of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for Strategic Development and National Projects (Minutes of December 24, 2018 N 16)).

REFERENCES

  1. Sordé Marti, T., Flecha, R., Rodríguez, J.A., and Bosch, J.L.C., Qualitative inquiry: A key element for assessing the social impact of research, Qualitative Inq., 2020, vol. 26, nos. 8–9, pp. 948–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420938117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yurevich, A.V., Social science and humanities in modern Russia: Adaptation to social context, Preprint no. WP6/2004/02, Moscow: HSE Univ., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Akker, W., Yes we should; research assessment in the humanities, Research Assessment in the Humanities, Ochsner, M., Hug, S., and Daniel, H.D., Eds., Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Gubanov, N.I. and Gubanov, N.N., Peculiarities of cognitive activity in social science and humanities, Filosofiya Obshchestvo, 2010, no. 2, pp. 90–104.

  5. Epstein, M.N., Ot znaniya — k tvorchestvu. Kak gumanitarnye nauki mogut izmenyat’ mir (From Knowledge to Creation: How Humanities Can Change the World), Humanitas, Moscow: Tsentr Gumanitarnykh Initsiativ, 2016.

  6. Lopatina, N.V., On the efficiency of information and analytical methods of assessment of research activity (on example of social sciences and humanities), Nauchn.-Tekhn. Inform., Ser. 1. Organ. Metod. Inf. Rab., 2020, no. 4, pp. 23–27. https://doi.org/10.36535/0548-0019-2020-04-4

  7. Zharova, E.N., Scientometrics in the sociohumanistic sciences: Problems and solutions, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2022, no. 4, pp. 34–53. https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-4-34-53

  8. Vinogradova, T.V., Bibliometrics and social sciences are not compatible?, Naukovedcheskie Issled., 2016, no. 2016, pp. 90–106.

  9. Archambault, E., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., and Gingrasb, Y., Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases, Scientometrics, 2006, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frolova, I.V., Russian humanities in false mirror of scientometrics, Ekon. Upr.: Nauchn.-Prakt. Zh., 2017, no. 2, pp. 101–105.

  11. Russian Index Science Citation. https://www.elibrary.ru/projects/citation/cit_index.asp.

  12. Shemberko, L.V. and Shershova, A.V., Normative and technological problems of bibliographic control over information resources on social sciences and humanities, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2018, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 55–62. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218010100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reale, E., Avramov, D., Canhial, K., Donovan, C., Flecha, R., Holm, P., Larkin, C., Lepori, B., Mosoni-Fried, J., Oliver, E., Primeri, E., Puigvert, L., Scharnhorst, A., Schubert, A., Soler, M., Soòs, S., Sordé, T., Travis, C., and Van Horik, E., A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research, Res. Eval., 2018, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, S., Zheng, M., Yu, Yo., and Wolfram, D., Are altmetric.com scores effective for research impact evaluation in the social sciences and humanities?, J. Informetrics, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 101120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Antopolsky, A.B., Features of the analysis of social sciences as an information process in a digital environment, Inf. Innovatsii, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 8–22. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2020-15-1-8-22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bornmann, L., What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinogradova, N.L. and Leontyeva, E.Yu., Scientrometrics in socialand humanitarian knowledge: Efficiency indicator or pursuit for numbers, Vestn. Volgogr. Gos. Univ. Ser. 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya Sotsial’nye Tekhnol., 2016, no. 4, pp. 156–163. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu7.2016.4.18

  18. Fecher, B., Kuper, F., Sokolovska, N., Fenton, A., Hornbostel, S., and Wagner, G.G., Understanding the societal impact of the social sciences and humanities: Remarks on roles, challenges, and expectations, Front. Res. Metrics Analytics, 2021, vol. 6, p. 696804. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.696804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ol’shevskii, V.G., National security and social sciences and humanities in the context of coevolution paradigm: Contours of the problem, Fundam. Prikl. Issled.: Probl. Rezul’t., 2013, no. 6, pp. 66–70.

  20. Osipov, G.V. and Klimovitskii, S.V., Evaluation of the social efficiency of fundamental scientific research, Sotsial’no-Gumanitarnye Znaniya, 2014, no. 5, pp. 54–62.

  21. Yurevich, A.V., Strategii razvitiya rossiiskoi nauki, Sotsiologiya Nauki Tekhnol., 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shestakova, M.A., Scientometric indicators in the social sciences and humanities: Basic problems, Naukovedcheskie Issled., 2016, no. 2016, pp. 213–230.

  23. Bornmann, L., Measurement of impact in evaluation of studies: Detailed discussion of methods, effects, and issues concerning the measurements of impact, Mezhdunarodnyi Forum Inf., 2018, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bornmann, L. and Marx, W., How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons, Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1020-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Borodkin, F.M., Social indicators—What are they?, Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 2004, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 62–101.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Popov, E.V., Omonov, Zh.K., Naumov, I.V., and Veretennikova, A.Yu., Tendentsii razvitiya sotsial’nykh innovatsii, Terra Economicus, 2018, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 35–59. https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-3-35-59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Basharina, A.V., Social innovations in education: The nature and classification, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2009, vol. 11, nos. 4–5, pp. 1101–1108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out within the framework of the study on the topic FFFU-2022-0007 of the State Assignment of the All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information VINITI, Russian Academy of Sciences, and with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-07-00014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information VINITI, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125315, Moscow, Russia

    P. A. Kalachikhin

Authors
  1. P. A. Kalachikhin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Kalachikhin.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalachikhin, P.A. Effectiveness of Social and Humanitarian Research. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 50, 47–52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688223010070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688223010070

Keywords:

Search

Navigation