Abstract
The quantity, research topics, and growth rates are assessed for Russian scholarly papers published in open-access megajournals. Russian papers published in PLoS ONE in 2006–2019 are analyzed on the basis of international scientometric indicators. The results are reported of the international coauthorship survey of Russian researchers to define its impact on citation indices. Affiliations are presented for authors with papers in megajournals. Funding of publication charges is discussed for Russian researchers who publish papers in open-access journals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Data on the number of published papers was obtained from the Scopus database in March 2020.
Data on the number of published papers was obtained from the Directory of Open Access Journals in March 2020. URL: https://doaj.org/
Our editorial process at Scientific Reports [Electron. resource]. 2020. URL: https://www.nature.com/srep/about/editorial-process
About OSA Continuum [Electron. resource]. 2020 URL: https://www.osapublishing.org/osac/journal/osac/about.cfm
Adams C. PLoS One PloS Blogs [Electron. resource]. 2011, SPARC website. URL: https://sparcopen.org/our-work/innovator/plos-one/
Funding for Open Access Articles [Electron. resource]. 2020– URL: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/funding/articles)
REFERENCES
Davis, F., Scientific reports overtakes PLoS One as largest megajournal, Scholarly Kitchen Blog. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/04/06/scientific-reports-overtakes-plos-one-as-largest-megajournal/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_me. Accessed March 4, 2020.
Wakeling S., Willett P., Creaser C., Fry J., Pinfield S., and Spezi, V., Open access megajournals: A bibliometric profile, PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 11. Accessed March 10, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165359
Spezi, V., Wakeling, S., Pinfield, S., Creaser, C., Fry, J., and Willett, P., Open-access mega-journals. The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground?, J. Doc., 2017, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 263–283.
Binfield, P., PLoS One and the rise of open access mega journal, Society of Scholarly Publishing (SSP) Meeting, 2016. https://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/ssp-presentation4. Accessed February 11, 2020.
Anderson, K., Can blockchain withstand skepticism? An inquiry, Scholarly Kitchen Blog, 2018. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/04/05/can-blockchainwithstand-skepticism-an-inquiry/. Accessed February 5, 2020.
Siler, K., Larivière, V., and Sugimoto, C.R., The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2020, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 800–816.
Björk, B.C., Have the 'mega-journals' reached the limits to “growth?,” PeerJ, 2015, vol. 3. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981
Pattinson, D., PLoS One publishes its 100,000th article, PloS Blogs, 2014. http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2014/06/23/plos-one-publishes-100000th-article/. Accessed February 20, 2020.
Ware, M., Peer review: Recent experience and future directions, New Rev. Inf. Networking, 2011, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 23–53.
Lăzăroiu, G., Do mega-journals constitute the future of scholarly communication?, Educ. Philos. Theory, 2017, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1300022
Cope, B. and Kalantiz, M., Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal, in The Future of the Academic Journal, Cope, B. and Phillips, A., Eds., Oxford: Chandos Publ., 2014, 2nd ed., pp. 9–83. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780634647.9
Buriak, J.M., Mega-journals and peer review: Can quality and standards survive, Chem. Mater., 2015, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2243–2243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01142
Tredennick, A., Why I published in PLoS One. And why I probably won’t again for a while, Early Career Ecol., 2013. https://earlycareerecologists.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/. Accessed February 20, 2020.
Butler, D., PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing, Nature, 2008, vol. 454, no. 7200, p. 11.
Wakeling, S., Spezi, V., Creaser, C., Fry, J., Pinfield, S., and Willett, P., Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations), Learned Publ., 2017, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 301–311.
Razumova, I.K., Litvinova, N.N., Shvartsman, M.E., and Kuznetsov, A.Yu., Attitude of Russia’s scientific community to Open Access: 2018 Analysis of the survey results, Nauka Nauchn. Inf., 2018, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2018-1-1-6-21
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., and Mabe, M., The STM Report,International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing, The Hague, 2018. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_ 2018.pdf.
Kotsemir, M.N., Publication activity of Russian scientists in leading world journals, Acta Nat., 2012, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 16–35.
National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators. NSB-2020-1, Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, 2020. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/global-science-and-technology-capabilities#international-research-collaboration. Accessed January 19, 2020.
Royle, J., Coles, L., Williiams, D., and Evans, P., Publishing in international journals: An examination of trends in Chinese co-authorship, Scientometrics, 2007, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 59–86.
Rossiiskii innovatsionnyi indeks (Russian Innovation Index), Gokhberg, L.M., Ed., Moscow: NIU VShE, 2011.
Pislyakov, V.V., Co-authorship of Russian scientists with foreign colleagues: Publications and their citation, Preprint WP6/2010/01, Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 2010.
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., and De Rouen, J.K., Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and periphery effects in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research institutes articles, 1995–2000, Scientometrics, 2003, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 321–337.
Kirchik, O.I., Invisible science. Patterns of internationalization of Russian scientific publications, Forsait, 2011, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 34–42.
Open access: In search of the optimal model, Univ. Kn., 2018, Jan.–Feb., pp. 54–58. http://www.unkniga.ru/copyright/copyrightcom/8107-otkririy-dostup-v-poiske-optimalnoy-modeli.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by A. Kobkova
About this article
Cite this article
Domnina, T.N. Russian Scholarly Papers in Open-Access Megajournals. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 47, 181–193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220030065
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220030065