Abstract
This paper presents the results of a new method that is applied for a multidimensional analysis of the publications, patents, and authors of the related arrays of documents that are prepared under thematically similar projects that are supported by a science foundation. The contribution to and impact of various groups of scientists on the results of these projects are analyzed. Specifically, it is established that Russian scientists that work abroad (expatriates) play an important role in improving the scientific level of domestic research and in engaging domestic and foreign scientists in such research investigations. The data on the distribution of publications, patents, and authors by domestic and foreign organizations and cities, as well as by subjects of the Russian Federation and foreign countries, are obtained and analyzed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belter, C.W., A bibliometric analysis of NOAA’s office of ocean exploration and research, Scientometrics, 2013, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 629–644.
Venable, G.T., Khan, N.R., Taylor, D.R., Thompson, C.J., Michael, L.M., and Klimo, P., A correlation between national institutes of health funding and bibliometrics in neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery, 2014, vol. 81, nos. 3–4, pp. 468–472.
Yang, J.S., Vannier, M.W., Wang, F., Deng, Y., Ou, F.R., Bennett, J., Liu, Y., and Wang, G., A bibliometric analysis of academic publication and NIH funding, J. Informetrics, 2013, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 318–324.
Cabezas-Clavijo, A., Robinson-Garcia, N., Escabias, M., and Jimenez-Contreras, E., Reviewers’ ratings and bibliometric indicators: Hand in hand when assessing over research proposals? PloS ONE, 2013, vol. 8, no. 6. doi: 10.1371/journalpone.006825
Jeschin, D., Lewison, G., and Anderson, A., A bibliometric database for tracking acknowledgements of research funding, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, United States, 1995, pp. 235–244.
Bourke, P. and Butler, L., The efficacy of different modes of funding research: Perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences, Res. Policy, 1999, vol. 28, pp. 499.
Wang, J. and Shapira, P., Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 2011, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 563–586.
Boyack, K. and Jordan, P., Metrics associated with NIH funding: A high-level view, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc., 2011, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 423–431.
Small, H., Belver C. Griffith and John Irvine and Ben R. Martin (as a team) win the 1997 Direk de Solla Price Award, Scientometrics, 1997, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 357–362.
Libkind, I.A., Markusova, V.A., Terekhov, A.I., Rubval’ter, D.A., and Libkind, A.N., Bibliometric analysis of competitive research project results, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2014, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 254–264.
Terekhov, A.I., Evaluating the performance of Russia in the research in nanotechnology, J. Nanopart. Res., 2012, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1250–1267.
Gilyarevskii, R.S. and Starostin, B.A., Inostrannye imena i nazvaniya v russkom tekste. Spravochnik (Foreign Names in Russian Texts. Handbook), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1985, ed. 3.
Markusova, V.A., Libkind, A.N., Mindeli, L.E., and Jansz, M., Bibliometric performance in two main research domains: The Russian Academy of Sciences and the higher education sector, COLNET J. Scientometrics Inf. Manage., 2014, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–60.
Libkind, I.A., Defining the scientific level of an assigned publication set, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2014, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 179–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.N. Libkind, A.I. Terekhov, V.A. Markusova, D.A. Rubval’ter, I.A. Libkind, 2015, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2015, No. 11, pp. 16–28.
About this article
Cite this article
Libkind, A.N., Terekhov, A.I., Markusova, V.A. et al. The results of competitive research projects: Bibliometric analysis of the contributions made by various groups of scientists, organizations, cities, regions, and countries. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 42, 252–263 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215040073
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215040073