Originally, most bibliometric research is aimed at the improvement of library collection-management methods and at the development of new methods for the selection of documents for a collection. This is also true of the impact factor, which was designed to evaluate journals before their inclusion in the collections of research libraries. Thus, the core of bibliometrics is librarianship. However, in recent years bibliometric studies are mainly conducted for the evaluation of scientific developments and individual scientists. In this case, a significant part of such research is carried out by workers at research libraries. Paradoxically, these approaches are not used in librarianship itself. With the expansion of the range of available tools, the development and use of bibliometric methods for the analysis of scientific information in libraries, especially in the acquisition process, once again has become relevant, which is consistent with the changes in science and publishing themselves. This has been stated by both foreign and domestic experts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Serials Price Projections for 2013, Ipswich: EBSCO Information Services, 2012.
Meadows, A., A Librarians and Societies and Publishers—Oh My!, http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/04/03/librarians-and-societies-and-publishers-oh-my/. Cited October 29, 2014.
Slashcheva, N.A., Mokhnacheva, Yu.V., and Kharybina, T.N., Izuchenie informatsionnykh potrebnostei pol’zovatelei Pushchinskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN v Tsentral’noi biblioteke Tsentra (department of the RAS LNS), in Biblioteki natsional’nykh akademii nauk: problemy funktsionirovaniya, tendentsii razvitiya: Nauchno-prakticheskii i teoreticheskii sbornik, (Library of the National Academies of Sciences, Functioning Problems, Development Trends. Research and Practice and Theoretical Collection), Kiev: NLU, 2008, pp. 247–264.
Jurski, D., 2013 Study of Subscription Prices for Scholarly; Society Journals Society Journal Pricing Trends and Industry Overview, Lawrence: Allen Press, 2013.
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., and Neylon, C., Altmetrics: a Manifesto, http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ (Cited October 29, 2014).
Artamonova, G.V., Galeev, A.R., and Bazhenova, T.S., An alternative method of assessing the relevance of medical and biological research of Russian NRU, Public Health Manager, 2012, no. 12, pp. 35–41.
Marshakova, I.V., Sistema tsitirovaniya nauchnoi literatury kak sredstvo slezheniya za razvitiem nauki (System of Citation of Scientific Literature as a Means of Tracking the Progress of Science), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.
Moore, W.H., Citation Versus Reputation: Assessing Political Science Journals, Tallahassee: Florida State Univ., 2000.
Vikhreva, G.M., Tsennostnye aspekty otbora dokumentov v fond nauchnoi biblioteki (Value-Based Aspects of Document Selection for a Research Library Collection), Novosibirsk: SPSTL, 2004.
Vikhreva, G.M., On axiological nature of library selection, Bibliotechnye Fondy: Problemy Resheniya, 2004, no. 6, pp. 1–4.
Shilov, V.V., The core of the library fund, Bibliotechnaya Zhizn’ Kuzbassa, 1998, no. 4, pp. 134–140.
Tsyganov, A.V. Brief description of scientometric indicators based on citation, Naukometriya Ekspertiza Upravlenii Naukoi, Moscow: IPU RAS, 2013.
Davis, P.M., Where to spend our e-journal money? Defining a university library’s core collection through citation analysis, Portal (Baltimore), 2002, vol. 2(1), pp. 155–166.
Garfield, E., Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 1972, vol. 178(4060), pp. 471–479.
Fedorets, O.V., The use of the training sample to determine the priority of criteria in the rating system of evaluation of scientific journals, Control Probl., 2009, no. 1, pp. 59–65.
Hirst, G., Discipline impact factors: a method for determining core journal lists, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1978, vol. 29(4), pp. 171–172.
Cawkell, A.E., Evaluating scientific journals with journal citation reports — a case study in acoustics, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1978, vol. 29(1), pp. 41–46.
Azarkina, M.A., Organization of journal fund of the research library. Acquisition problems, Bibliotechnoe Delo, 2007, no. 5, pp. 17–20.
Azarkina, M.A., Organization of journal fund of the research library. Acquisition problems, Bibliotechnoe Delo, 2007, no. 6, pp. 41–42.
Pislyakov, V.V., Analiz kontenta vedushchikh elektronnykh resursov aktual’noi zarubezhnoi periodiki. Kolichestvennyi analiz v ekonomike (Content Analysis of Leading Electronic Resources of Relevant Foreign Periodicals. Quantitative Analysis in Economics), Moscow: GU-VShE, 2002.
Kirillova, O.V., Andronova, M.B., Divil’kovskaya, T.Yu., and Khachko, O.A., New approaches and results of the information center evaluating the Russian flow of scientific journals: criteria and presentation of the ranked data, Educational Technology & Society, 2006, vol. 9(3), pp. 321–334.
Amin, M. and Mabe, M.A., Impact factors: use and abuse, Medicina (Buenos Aires), 2003, vol. 63(4), pp. 347–354.
The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature, PLOS Medicine, 2006, vol. 3(6), pp. 0707–0708.
Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., and Hill, E., Show me the data, J. Cell Biol., 2007, vol. 179(6), pp. 1091–1092.
Adler, R., Ewing, J., and Taylor, P., A report from the international mathematical union (IMU) in cooperation with the international council of industrial and applied mathematics (ICIAM) and the institute of mathematical statistics (IMS), Stat. Sci., 2009, vol. 24(1), pp. 1–14.
Arnold, D.N. and Fowler, K.K., Nefarious numbers, Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 2011, vol. 58(3), pp. 434–437.
Campbell, P., Escape from the impact factor, Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit., 2008, vol. 8(1), pp. 5–7.
Falagas, M.E. and Alexiou, V.G., The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Ex., 2008, vol. 56(4), pp. 223–226.
González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J.C., and Aleixandre-Benavent, R., The impact factor in non-English-speaking countries, Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 92(2), pp. 297–311.
Seglen, P.O., Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, Br. Med. J., 1997, vol. 314(7079), pp. 498–502.
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment Putting Science into the Assessment of Research, San Francisco: United States Society for Cell Biology, 2013.
Duy, J. and Vaughan, L., Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination, J. Acad. Librariansh., 2006, vol. 32(5), pp. 512–517.
Chrzastowski, T.E., Journal collection cost-effectiveness in an academic chemistry library, Collection Management, 1991, vol. 14(1–2), pp. 85–98.
Pan, E., Journal citation as a predictor of journal usage in libraries, Collection Management, 1978, vol. 2(1), pp. 29–38.
Thelwall, M., Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective, Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 92(2), pp. 429–441.
Leydesdorff, L., Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the mosthighly cited papers, Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 92(2), pp. 355–365.
Colledge, L., De Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Lopez-Illescas, C., El Aisati, M., and Moed, H.F., SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier’s Scopus, Serials, 2010, vol. 23(3), pp. 215–221.
Moed, H.F., Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, J. Informetr., 2010, vol. 4(3), pp. 265–277.
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., and Moya-Anegon, F., A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator, J. Informetr., 2010, vol. 4(3), pp. 379–391.
Haddawy, P. and Hassan, S.-U., A comparison of three prominent journal metrics with expert judgement of journal quality, Context Counts: Pathways to Master Big and Little Data, Leiden, 2014, pp. 238–240.
Tiers for the Australian Ranking of Journals. http://www.arc.gov.au/era/tiers_ranking.htm. Cited Octorber 29, 2014.
Kim, M.T., Ranking of journals in library and information-science—a comparison of perceptual and citation-based measures, Coll. Res. Libr., 1991, vol. 52(1), pp. 24–37.
Lozano, G.A., Larivière, V., and Gingras, Y., The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 63(11), pp. 2140–2145.
Ellison, G., Is peer review in decline, Econ. Enq., 2011, vol. 49(3), pp. 635–657.
Bensman, S.J., The impact factor: its place in Garfield’s thought, in science evaluation, and in library collection management, Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 92(2), pp. 263–275.
Moed, H.F., Colledge, L., Reedijk, J., Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Plume, A., and Amin, M., Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way, Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 92(2), pp. 367–376.
Gross, P.L.K. and Gross, E.M., College libraries and chemical education, Science, 1927, vol. 66(1713), pp. 385–389.
Allen, E.S., Periodicals for mathematicians, Science, 1929, vol. 70(1825), pp. 592–594.
McNeely, J.K. and Crosno, C.D., Periodicals for electrical engineers, Science, 1930, vol. 72(1856), pp. 81–84.
Gross, P.L.K. and Woodford, A.O., Serial literature used by American geologists, Science, 1931, vol. 73(1903), pp. 660–664.
Hooker, R.H., A study of scientific periodicals, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1935, vol. 6(11), pp. 333–338.
Jenkins, R.L., Periodicals for medical libraries, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 1931, vol. 97(9), pp. 608–610.
Gregory, J., An evaluation of periodical literature from the standpoint of endocrinology, Endocrinol., 1935, vol. 19(2), pp. 213–215.
Hackh, I., The periodicals useful in the dental library, Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 1936, vol. 25(1–2), pp. 109–112.
Via, B.J. and Schmidle, D.J., Investing wisely: citation rankings as a measure of quality in library and information science journals, Portal Libr. Acad., 2007, vol. 7(3), pp. 333–373.
Sengupta, I.N., Impact of scientific serials on the advancement of medical knowledge: an objective method of analysis, Int. Libr. Rev., 1972, vol. 4(2), pp. 169–195.
Sengupta, I.N., The growth of biophysical literature, Scientometrics, 1985, vol. 8(5–6), pp. 365–375.
Servi, P.N. and Griffith, B.C., A method for partitioning the journal literature, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1980, vol. 31(1), pp. 36–40.
McCain, K.W., Core journal networks and co-citation maps: new bibliometric tools for serials research and management, Libr. Q., 1991, vol. 61(3), pp. 311–336.
Brown, C.H. and Krumm, R.V., Scientific serials: characteristics and lists of most cited publications in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology, physiology, botany, zoology, and entomology, Chicago: Association of College and Reference Libraries, 1956.
Hockings, E.F., Selection of scientific periodicals in an industrial research library, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1974, vol. 25(2), pp. 131–132.
Brookes, B.C., Optimum p% library of scientific periodicals, Nature, 1971, vol. 232(5311), pp. 458–461.
Ash, J., Library use of public health materials: description and analysis, Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 1974, vol. 62(2), pp. 95–104.
Chambers, G.R. and Healey, J.S., Journal citations in master’s theses: one measurement of a journal collection, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1973, vol. 24(5), pp. 397–401.
McCain, K.W. and Bobick, J.E., Patterns of journal use in a departmental library—a citation analysis, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1981, vol. 32(4), pp. 257–267.
LaBorie, T. and Halperin, M., Citation patterns in library science dissertations, J. Educ. Librarianship, 1976, vol. 16(4), pp. 271–283.
Drott, C. and Griffith, B.C., Empirical examination of Bradford’s law and the scattering of scientific literature, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1978, vol. 29(5), pp. 238–246.
Dubrov, A.P. and Krasikova, O.L., The use of the citation analysis for studying the formation of the fund of foreign journals in scientific academic libraries, Nauchn. Tekh. Biblioteki, 1998, no. 6, pp. 26–34.
Pislyakov, V.V. and Lyubushko, E.E., The analysis of scientific and information activities (reading, publications, and citations) of scientists of the Institute of Catalysis of the SB RAS, Kataliz Prom-st., 2007, no. 3, pp. 55–63.
Mazov, N.A., The evaluation of the flow of scientific publications of the academic institution based on the bibliometric analysis of citation, Inform. Technol. Gumanitarnykh Issledovaniyakh, 2011, no. 16, pp. 25–30.
Slashcheva, N.A. and Mokhnacheva, Yu.V., Electronic information in scientometric studies, Nauchn.-Tekhn. Inform., Ser. 1. Organ. Metod. Inf. Rab., 2003, no. 5, pp. 21–27.
Mokhnacheva, Yu.V., Data support of research by academic libraries using bibliometric methods, Cand. Sci. (Pedagogic) Dissertation, Moscow, 2008.
Gureev, V.N. and Mazov, N.A., Themes of the publications of an organization as a basis for forming an objective and optimal repertoire of scientific periodicals, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2013, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 195–204.
Gureyev, V.N. and Mazov, N.A., Detection of information requirements of researchers using bibliometric analyses to identify target journals, Inf. Tech. Libr., 2013, vol. 32(4), pp. 66–77.
Tenopir, C. and King, D.W., Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns, D-Lib Magazine, 2008, vol. 14(11–12), pp. 1–13.
Podkorytova, N.I., Bosina, L.V., and Lakizo, I.G., System of the centralized acquisition of the CLS SB RAS. Results and prospects, Bibliosfera, 2012, no. 5, pp. 54–57.
Derevyanko, A.P. and Kholyushkin, Yu.P., The problem of the qualitative analysis of archaeological publications, in Metodologiya i metodika arkheologicheskikh rekonstruktsii: Sb. nauch. trudov (Methodology and methods of archaeological reconstructions. Collection of scientific papers), Novosibirsk: SB RAS, 1994.
Shotton, D., Cito, The citation typing ontology, J. Biomed. Semant., 2010, vol. 1, suppl. 1, p. S6.
Simkin, M.V. and Roychowdhury, V.P., Read before you cite, Complex Syst., 2003, no. 14, pp. 262–274.
Simkin, M.V. and Roychowdhury, V.P., Do you sincerely want to be cited? Or: read before you cite, Significance, 2006, vol. 3(4), pp. 179–181.
Sandison, A., Library optimum, Nature, 1971, vol. 234(5328), pp. 368–369.
Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., and Paulson, K.L., Relying on electronic journals: reading patterns of astronomers, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2005, vol. 56(8), pp. 786–802.
Halevi, G. and Moed, H.F., Usage patterns of scientific journals and their relationship with citations, Context Counts: Pathways to Master Big and Little Data, Leiden, 2014, pp. 241–251.
Khaitun, S.D., Naukometriya. Sostoyanie i perspektivy (Scientometrics. Status and Prospects), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.
Garfield, E., Keywords plus—ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current-contents on diskette, Current Contents, 1990, vol. 32, pp. 5–9.
Garfield, E. and Sher, I.H., Keywords-plus(tm)—algorithmic derivative indexing, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1993, vol. 44(5), pp. 298–299.
Dhawan, S.M., Phull, S.K., and Jain, P., Documentation notes, J. Doc., 1980, vol. 36(1), pp. 24–32.
Colledge, L. and Verlinde, R., SciVal metrics guidebook, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2014.
Original Russian Text © V.N. Gureev, N.A. Mazov, 2015, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2015, No. 2, pp. 8–19.
About this article
Cite this article
Gureev, V.N., Mazov, N.A. Assessment of the relevance of journals in research libraries using bibliometrics (a review). Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 42, 30–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215010050
- citation analysis
- bibliometric analysis
- content analysis
- research libraries
- scientific journals