Skip to main content

Evaluation of the cognitive ergonomics of ontologies on the basis of graph analysis


This paper is concerned with the evaluation of ontology quality. A classification of the available evaluation of ontologies methods is given and a model for evaluation of ontology readability from the cognitive point of view is described. In addition, we propose a method for automatic evaluation of cognitive ergonomics on the basis of graph analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Wertheimer, M. Productive Thinking. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1945; Moscow: Progress, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gavrilova, T. On one Approach to Ontological Engineering, Novosti Iskusstv. Intellekta, 2005, issue 3, pp. 25–31.

  3. Gavrilova, T. Gestalt Principles in Ontology Construction, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Cognitive Science, vol. 1, St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 240–242.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorovoii, V.A. Model of Classification of Evaluation of ontologies Methods, Mater. 2-i Mezhd. Molodezhn. Konf. “Iskusstv. Intellekt: Fiosofiya, Metodologiya, Innovatsii” (Proc. 2nd Int. Youth. Conf.: “Artificial Intelligence: Philosophy, Methodology and Innovations”), St. Petersburg, 15–17 November 2007, pp. 307–310.

  5. Kleshchev, A.S. and Shalfeeva, E.A. List of Ontology Properties: Principles of Catalogue Organization, Preprint of Institute for Automation and Control Processes, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 2007, p. 20

  6. Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., and Mladenic, D.A., Survey of Evaluation of ontologies Techniques. Proc. Conf. Data Mining and Data Warehouses (SiKDD 2005), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2005; hittp//

  7. Brewster, C., et al., Data Driven Ontology Evaluation, Proc. Int. Conf. Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, 2004.

  8. Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., and Lehmann, J. Evaluation of ontologies and Validation. An Integrated Formal Model for the Quality Diagnostic Task,

  9. Gavrilova, T., and Gorovoy V. Technology for Ontological Engineering Lifecycle Support, Int. J. Inform. Theories Appli., 2007, vol. 14, pp. 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N. and Welty, C. Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean, Comm. ACM, 2002, vol. 45, issue 2, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann, J., et al. Methods for Ontology Evaluation. Knowledge Web Deliverable Dl.2.3, 2005.

  12. Jena Semantic Web Framework homepage.

  13. Lozano-Tello, A. and Gomez-Perez, A. Ontometric: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology, J. Database Mgmt., 2004, vol. 15, issue 2, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maedche A. and Staab S. Measuring Similarity between Ontologies, Proc. CIKM, 2002.

  15. Miller G. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review, 1956, vol. 63, pp. 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porzel R. and Malaka R.A. Task-Based Approach for Ontology Evaluation, Proc. ECAI, 2004.

  17. Spyns P. EvaLexon: Assessing Triples Mined from Texts, Technical Report 09, STAR Lab, Brussels, Belgium, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.A. Gavrilova, V.A. Gorovoy, E.S. Bolotnikova, 2009, published in Iskusstvennyi Intellekt i Prinyatie Reshenii, 2009, No. 3, pp. 33–41.

About this article

Cite this article

Gavrilova, T.A., Gorovoy, V.A. & Bolotnikova, E.S. Evaluation of the cognitive ergonomics of ontologies on the basis of graph analysis. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 37, 398–406 (2010).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Ontological engineering
  • ontology evaluation
  • knowledge engineering