Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The problems of the evolution of theoretical positions in the disciplines of the documental-information cycle (a review)

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper considers the problems of the creation and development of the documental-information theory for the cycle of disciplines that have a documental character (with the code 05.25.00), formulates the main scientific principles, general concepts, and reveals the main methodological problems in constructing an integrated theoretical space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semenkover, B.A., The Return to a Text. Crisis or Bloom?: a “Round Table” on the Subject “Modern Paradigm of Bibliographic Science,” Sovr. bibliografiya, 1991, no 3, pp. 54–55.

  2. Gilyarevskii, R.S., A New Technology is a Renewed Theory. Crisis or Bloom?: a “Round Table” on the Subject “Modern Paradigm of Bibliographic Science,” Sovr. bibliografiya, 1991, no 3, pp. 54–55. C. 52–53.

  3. Korshunov, O.P., Researching the Bases of the General Theory of Bibliographic (Secondary Documental) Information: Cand. Sci (Pedagogy) Dissertation, Moscow, 1977.

  4. Avtokratov, V.N., On the Problem of Involving Information Categories into Archival Science, Trydy VNIIDAD (Proceedings of the VNIIDAD), Moscow, 1973, vol. 3, pp. 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avtokratov. V.N., Theoretical Problems of the Soviet Archival Science: Cand. Sci. (History), Dissertation, Moscow, 1982.

  6. Barenbaum, I.E., On the Relationship between the Theory, History, Methods, and Practice of Bibliology (A Historical-Prognostic Review), in Issled. i materialy, (Researches and Materials), Collection 68, 1994, pp. 5–18.

  7. Vinogradov, V.M., Styazhkin, I.I., Tsalenko, M.N., Chumachenko, E.G., Theoretical Problems of Archival Science from the Standpoint of Informatics, NTI, ser. 1, 1984, no 9, pp. 1–8.

  8. Stolyarov, Yu.N., Biblioteka: strukturno-funtsional’nyi podkhod (A Library: the Structural-Functional Approach), Moscow: Kniga, 1981, p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fokeev, V.A., Priroda bibliograficheskogo znaniya, (The Nature of Bibliographical Knowledge), Moscow, 1995, p. 352.

  10. Fokeev, V.A., The Ideo-Documentographic Concept of Bibliography, Bibliografiya, 1995, no 4, pp. 60–70.

  11. Gordukalova, G.F., A Documental Flow in the Bibliographic Activity: the History, Theory, Technology of Mastering: Dr. Sci (Pedagogy) Dissertation, St. Petersburg: SPbGIK, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuleshov, S.G. Dokumental’ni dzherela naukovoi informatsii: ponyattya, tipologiya, istoriya tipologichnoi skhemy (The Documental Forms of Scientific Information: Notions, Typology, History of the Typological Scheme), Kiev: UkrINTEI, 1995, p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuleshov, S.G. Typology of Scientific Documents: History and Modem State: Cand. Sci (History) Dissertation, Kiev, 1997.

  14. Sokolov, A.V., Information: a Phenomenon? Function? Fiction?, Filosofiya nauki, 1990, no 9, pp. 13–22.

  15. Stolyarov, Yu.N., In for a Penny, in for a Pound, or the Commentary on a Discussion about informatics, Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki, 1991, no 4, pp. 28–32.

  16. Stolyarov, Yu.N., Sushchnost’ informatsii (The Essence of Information), Moscow: Mezhdun. Adademiya informatizatsii. Otd. “Bibliotekovedeniye”; Gos. publ. nauch.-tekhn. b-ka Rossii, Moscow, 2000, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stolyarov, Yu.N., The Law of Documental Equipping of Social Communications, Bibliotekovedeniye, 2002, no 6, pp. 22–30.

  18. Gilyarevskii, R.S., What is Informatics? NTI, ser. 1, 1989, no 11, pp. 19–21.

  19. Gilayrevskii, R.S., Osnovy informatiki (The Bases of informatics), Moscow, 1998.

  20. Vasilenko, G.A., An Electronic Book (Pro and Contra): a View from the Interne, NTI, ser. 1, 2001, no 4, pp. 14–23.

  21. Shreider, Yu.A., On the Semantic Theory of Information, Problemy kinernetiki, Part 13, Moscow: Nauka, 1965, pp. 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shreider, Yu.A., Information and Meta-Information, NTI, ser. 2, 1974, no 4, pp. 3–10.

  23. Muskheshvili, N.L., Shreider, Yu.A., Autocommunication As a Necessary Component of Communication, NTI, ser. 2, 1987, no 5, pp. 1–10.

  24. Shreider, Yu.A. and Polotovskaya, I.L., The Future Is Coming Today: (A Document As an Object of Bibliography Science), Sov. bibliografiya, 1988, no 1, pp. 28–34.

  25. Shreider, Yu.A., Bibliography — an Object of Interest and Subject of Cognition. Bibliografiya, 1998, no 2, pp. 48–56.

  26. Kuleshov, S. G., Dokumentoznavsvo: Istoriya. Teoretichni osnovi (Documentation Science: History. Theoretical Bases), Kiev: UDNDDIASD, DAKKiM, 2000, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.M., Dokument i kniga v sisteme sotsial’nykh kommunikatsii (A Document and Book in the System of Social Communications), Rivne, 2001, p. 437.

  28. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.M., (A Document and Book in the System of Social Communications): Cand. Sci (History) Dissertation, Kiev, 2002.

  29. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.M., Obshchaya teoriya dokumenta i knigi: ucheb. posobiye (The General Theory of a Document and Book: A Manual), Moscow: Rybari; Kiev: Znannya, 2009, p. 487.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pleshkevich, E.A., Osnovy obshchei teorii dokumenta (The Bases of the General Document Theory), Saratov: Nauchnaya kniga, 2005, p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Andreev, I.D., Teoriya kak forma organizatsii nauchnogo razvitiya (A Theory as a Form of Organization of Scientific Development), Moscow. 1979.

  32. Avtokratov, V.N., Teoreticheskiye problemy otechestvennogo arkhivovedeniya (The Theoretical Problems of the Domestic Archival Science), Moscow: 2001, p. 396.

  33. Grechikhin, A.A., Sovremennye problemy tipologii knigi (The Modern Problems of Book Typology), Voronezh: Isd-vo Voronezh un-ta, 1989, p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mozaeva, G.V., Information as a Historical Category: On the Problem of Information Source Science, in Rol’ informatsii v formirovanii i razvitii sitsiuma v istoricheskom proshlom (The Role of Information in the Formation and Development of Society in the Historical Past), Moscow: IBI RAN, 2004, pp. 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Petrushenko, L.A., The Interrelation between Information and a System, Voprosy filosofii, 1969, no 2, pp. 104–114.

  36. Vashchekin, N.P. and Abramov, Yu.F., Informatsionnaya deyatel’nost’ i mirovozzreniye (Information Activity and World Outlook), Irkutsk, 1990.

  37. Avtokratov, V.N., On Some Problems of Archival Science, Sov. arkhivy, 1976, no 6, pp. 11–24.

  38. Dvorkina, M.Ya., On an Object and Subject of Library Science Once Again, Bibliotekovedeniye, 2005, no 4, pp. 37–40.

  39. Einshtein, A. Fizika i real’nost’ (Physics and Reality), Moscow, 1965.

  40. Shreder, Yu.A., An Alternative is a Death of Culture. Crisis or Bloom?: A “Round Table” on the Subject “Modern Paradigm of Bibliography Science,” Sov. bibliografiya, 1991, no 3, pp. 39–40.

  41. Sokolov, A.V., Informatsionnyi podkhod k dokumental’noi kommunikatsii: Ucheb. posobiye dlya studentov bibl. fak. (The Information Approach to Documental Communication: A Manual for students of Librarian Faculties), Leningrad: LGIK, 1988, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sokolov, A.V., Communication Activity and Communication Phenomena, Nauch. i tekh. b-ki, 1994, no 8, pp. 3–14; no 9, pp. 41–55; no 10, pp. 3–14, no 11, pp. 43–50.

  43. Sokolov, A.V., Obshchaya teoriya sotsial’noi kommunikatsii (The General Theory of Social Communication), St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Mikialova V.A., 2002, p. 461.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stolyarov, Yu.N., The Classification of a Document: Solutions and Problems in Issled. i materialy (Researches and Materials), Moscow, 1995, collection 70, pp. 24–40.

  45. Stolyarov, Yu.N., The Relationship between a Book and Documents, Bibliology and Documentation Science, in Issled. i materialy (Researches and Materials), Moscow, 2001, collection 79, pp. 76–84.

  46. Stolyarov, Yu.N., A Document is a Conventional Notion (As a Matter for Discussion), Deloproizvodstvo, 2005, no. 3, pp. 11–18.

  47. Stolyarov, Yu.N., The Theory of Relativity of a Document, Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki, 2006, no 7, pp. 73–78.

  48. Kuznetsov, I.V., The Structure of Physical Theory, Voprosy filosofii, 1967, no 11, pp. 86–98.

  49. Ursul, A.D., The Development of Informatics and Informatization of Society: Problems of Methodology, NTI, ser. 1, 1989, no 1, pp. 2–9.

  50. Korshunov, O.P., Problemy obshchei teorii bibliografii (The Problems of the General Theory of Bibliography), Moscow: 1975, p. 191.

  51. Korshunov, O.P., Bibliografiya: teoriya, metodologiya, metodika (Bibliography: Theory, Methodology, Methods), Moscow, 1986, p. 287.

  52. Spravochnik bibliografa (A Reference Book of a Bibliographer), Vaneev, A,N., Minkina, V.A., Sci. Ed., 2-nd ed., process. and suppl., St. Petersburg: Professiya, 2003, p. 560.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bespalova, E.K., Bibliography Science: Scientific and Pedagogic Practice, Bibliografiya, 2003, no 4, pp. 16–34.

  54. Barsuk, A.I., The Development of the Bibliologic Concept of Bibliography, in Issled. i materially (Researches and Materials), coll. 42, 1986, pp. 35–54.

  55. Tyutyunnik, V.M., Three Decades at the interface between Library Science and Informatics (To the 60-th Anniversary of Professor V. V. Skvortsov), NTI, ser. 1, 1999, no 12, pp. 35–37.

  56. Skvortsov, V.V., Teoreticheskiye osnovy bibliotekovedeniya (The Theoretical Bases of Library Science), Moscow: MGUK, 1996, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stolyarov, Yu.N., On the Relationship between a Book and Documents, Bibliology and Documentation Science, in Issled. i materially (Researches and Materials), coll. 79, 2001, pp. 76–84.

  58. Stolyarov, Yu.N., On the Place of Documentation Science in the System of Sciences, NTI, ser. 1, 2004, no 6, pp. 1–3.

  59. Stolyarov, Yu.N., Why Does Documentation Science Need Documentology, and Why Does Bibliology Need it? A Small Picture for the Revelation of Big Questions, Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki, 2006, no 9, pp. 67–73.

  60. Berenbaum, I.E., Bibliology and an Electronic Book, in Issled. i materially (Researches and Materials), coll. 76, 1999, pp. 5–15.

  61. Briskman, M.A., The Soviet Theory of Bibliography in the 20-30-s., Tr. Lenigradskogo bibliotechnogo instituta im. N. A. Kripskoi (Proceedings of the Leningrad Library Institute named after N. A. Krupskaya), Leningrad, 1961, vol. 9, pp. 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Khokhirdina, T.I., The Discovery of V. N. Avtokratov (1922–1992), in Avtokratov, V.N., Teoreticheskiye problemy otechestvennogo arkhivovedeniya (Avtokratov V. N., Theoretical Problems of the Domestic Archival Science), Moscow, 2001, pp. 5–22.

  63. Mityaev, KG., Documentation Science, Its Tasks and Prospects for Development, Voprosy arkhivovedeniya, 1964, no 2, pp. 27–37.

  64. Malitikov, A.S., On the Problem of Forecasting Scientific Researches in the Field of Documentation Science and Archival Science, Sov. arkhivy, 1969, no 6, pp. 41–46.

  65. Khokordina, T.I., “Neizvestnyi Mayakovskii (The Unknown Mayakovskii), Moscow, 2001, p. 96.

  66. Savin, V.A., The Archival Fund of the Russian Federation as an Object of Cognition. The Historical Aspect, Otech. arkhivy, 2005, no 2, pp. 21–28.

  67. Likhovid, T.F., On the Potential for Creating the Common Theory of Bibliography, Voprosy bibliografovediniya. Vypusk 16. Metodologicheskiye i teoreticheskiye problemy bibliografii v kontekste novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologii, Moscow: Pashkov Dom, 2007, pp. 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. E. A. Pleshkevich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.A. Pleshkevich, 2009, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2009, No. 7, pp. 1–11.

About this article

Cite this article

Pleshkevich, E.A. The problems of the evolution of theoretical positions in the disciplines of the documental-information cycle (a review). Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 36, 187–197 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688209040017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688209040017

Key words

Search

Navigation