Skip to main content
Log in

Number of Replications during Monitoring of the Soil Organic Carbon Content in Forest

  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

The estimation of the required number of soil samples to assess the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) in forest biogeocenosis during monitoring studies is considered using the example of data given in an article by E.A. Dmitriev et al. Primary data on the SOC content were obtained in a spruce forest at 166 sites in layers of 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm after removal of the litter. The sampling was performed at points of a regular grid formed by equilateral triangles with 1-m sides within a regular hexagon with a side of 7 m. The SOC content was determined by the method by Tyurin. The original article presents statistics for three zones: near-trunk, under-crown, and inter-crown. The spatial variation of carbon content in all the zones and at all depths is high, the coefficients of variation are about 50%. It is shown that the number of replications required to estimate the mean SOC content at a 95% confidence level is hundreds of samples in the 0- to 10-cm layer and decreases to tens of samples in the 20- to 30-cm layer. Since the number of replications for testing hypotheses about the equality of means depends not only on the confidence level, but also on the power of the criterion used, the required number of replications increases several times. Testing by samples taken from the entire vertical 0- to 30-cm-thick layer with the formation of composite samples reduces the number of required replications. However, careful observation of sample preparation, including primary mixing of samples, is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

REFERENCES

  1. Akhmalishev, K.B., Agrarian development effect onto properties of sod-podzolic soils of modern forests, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Agric.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2007.

  2. Demakov, Yu.P., Isaev, A.V., Nureev, N.B., et al., Boundaries and variety reasons of carbon storages in soils of Middle Volga River forests, Vestn. Povolzh. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., 2018, no. 3.

  3. Dmitriev, E.A. and Samsonova, V.P., Spatial variety of exchange calcium content in sod-podzolic soil under fir-trees, Nauch. Dokl. Vyssh. Shkoly, Ser. Biol. Nauki, 1975, no. 11.

  4. Dmitriev, E.A. and Sapozhnikov, P.M., Bulk density and specific surface change in sod-podzolic soils under forest: detail analysis, Pochvovedenie, 1978, no. 11.

  5. Dmitriev, E.A., Matematicheskaya statistika v pochvovedenii (Mathematical Statistics for Soil Science), Moscow, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dmitriev, E.A., Rekubratskii, I.V., Gorelova, Yu.V., et al., Organization of soil cover properties under fir-trees, in Strukturno-funktsional’naya rol’ pochvy v biosfere (Soil Structural and Functional Role in the Biosphere), Moscow, 1999.

  7. GOST (State Standard) no. 17.4.4.02: Nature Protection. Soils. Methods for Sampling and Preparation of Soil for Chemical, Bacteriological, Helmintological Analysis, 2002.

  8. GOST R (Russian State Standard) no. 585952-2019: Soils. Sampling, 2019.

  9. Kondrashkina, M.I., How sample’s form and size influences onto the information on soil object, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1991.

  10. Kozlov, M.V., Planirovanie ekologicheskikh issledovanii (Planning of Ecological Researches), Moscow, 2014.

  11. Piepho, H.-P., Statistika dlya bakalavrov po spetsial’nostyam: Agrobiologiya (AB), Agrarnye nauki (AN) i Vozobnovlyaemye prirodnye resursy (VPR) v Universitete Khoenkhaim. 1 semestr (AB, AN, VPR), 3 semestr (VPR) (Statistik für Studierende der Agrarbiologie, Agrarwissenschaften und erneuerbare natürliche Ressourcen an der Universität. Hohenheim, 1 und 3 Semester), Moscow, 2011.

  12. Podvezennaya, M.A. and Ryzhova, I.M., The relationships between the variability of soil carbon reserves and the spatial structure of the plant cover in forest biogeocenoses, Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull., 2010, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramsey, M., Sampling the environment: twelve key questions that need answers, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2004, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb00741.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Samsonova, V.P. and Kondrashkina, M.I., The relationship between the information on soil’s object and sample’s form, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., 1991, no. 2.

  15. Samsonova, V.P., Meshalkina, J.L., Dobrovol’skaya, V.A., et al., Investigation of uncertainty in organic carbon stock estimates on a field scale, Eur. Soil Sci., 2023, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1765–1776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrumpf, M., Schulze, E., Kaiser, K., et al., How accurately can soil organic carbon stocks and stock changes be quantified by soil inventories?, Biogeosciences, 2011, no. 8. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1193-2011

  17. Sidorova, V.A., Spatial variety dynamics of soil properties for meadow agrocenosises in Karelia under post-anthropogenic development, Ross. Zh. Prikl. Ekol., 2016, no. 3.

  18. Stolbovoy, V., Montanarella, L. Filippi, N., et al., Soil Sampling Protocol to Certify the Changes of Organic Carbon Stock in Mineral Soil of the European Union. Version 2, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tirez, K., Vanhoof, C., Siegfried, H., et al., Estimating the contribution of sampling sample pretreatment and analysis in the total uncertainty budget of agricultural soil pH and organic carbon monitoring, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2014, vol. 45, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.867056

  20. Vadyunina, A.F. and Korchagina, Z.A., Metody issledo-vaniya fizicheskikh svoistv pochv (Methods for Researching Soils’ Physical Properties), Moscow, 1986.

Download references

Funding

This work was performed within the framework of the implementation of the important innovative project of national importance “Development of a System for Ground-Based and Remote Monitoring of Carbon Pools and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes on the Territory of the Russian Federation Ensuring the Creation of a System for Recording Data on Flows of Climatically Active Substances and Carbon Budget in Forests and Other Terrestrial Ecological Systems,” no. 123030300031-6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Samsonova.

Ethics declarations

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This work does not contain any studies involving human and animal subjects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samsonova, V.P., Meshalkina, J.L., Kondrashkina, M.I. et al. Number of Replications during Monitoring of the Soil Organic Carbon Content in Forest. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 79, 13–18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687424010071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687424010071

Keywords:

Navigation