Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation between phytotoxicity and properties of soils containing a group of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

  • Ecology
  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

Soil toxicity is evaluated in various ecotopes near the city of Elektrougli, Moscow oblast, according to data of a short-term root biotest with Latuca sativa. Correlation of toxicity with the main properties of the soil and the content of some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is analyzed. It is revealed that phytotoxicity is characterized by close direct correlation with the content of light fluorene and inverse correlation with the content of organic carbon. There is a direct correlation between the content of heavy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and organic carbon and between light naphthalene and finely dispersed fractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alekseeva, T.A. and Teplitskaya, T.A., Spektrofluorimet-richeskie metody analiza aromaticheskikh uglevodorodovv prirodnykh i tekhnogennykh sredakh (Spectrofluori-metric Analysis of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Naturaland Technogenic Environments), Leningrad, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biogeokhimicheskie osnovy ekologicheskogo normirovaniya (Biogeochemical Princpiles of Ecological Standardization), Moscow, 1993.

  3. Volosatova, Yu.V., Krasnopeeva, A.A., and Chernyanskii, S.S., Formation of reserves of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in soils with different technogenic burden (byexample of Moscow region), in Mater. mezhd. shkolykonf. (Proc. Int. School-Conf.), Moscow, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gabov, D.N., Beznosikov, V.A., and Kondratenok, B.M., Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in background podzolic and gleyic peat-podzolic soils, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2007, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 256–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabov, D.N., Beznosikov, V.A., Kondratenok, B.M.,and Bushnev, D.A., Identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2004,vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1156–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gennadiev, A.N., Kozin, I.S., and Shurubor, E.I.,Dynamics of soil pollution by polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons and soil ecosystem indicators, Pochvovedenie, 1990, no. 10, pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gennadiev, A.N., Pikovskii, Yu.I., Florovskaya, V.N.,et al., Geokhimiya politsiklicheskikh aromaticheskikhuglevodorodov v gornykh porodakh i pochvakh (Geochemistry of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in MountainRocks and Soils), Moscow, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gennadiev A.N., Pikovskii, Yu.I., Chernyanskii, S.S., Alekseeva, T.A., and Kovach, R.G. Forms of polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons and factors of their accumulations in soils affected by technogenic pollution (Moscow oblast), Eurasian Soil Sci., 2004, vol. 37, no. 7,pp. 697–709.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gosudarstvennyi doklad “O sostoyanii i okhrane okryzhayushchei sredy Moskovskoi oblasti v 2002 godu” (Governmental Report “On Status and Protection of Environment in Moscow Oblast in 2002”). http:/mosobl.priroda.ru

  10. Grechishcheva, N.Yu., Interaction of humic acids withpolynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons: chemical and toxicological aspects, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci.(Chem.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2000.

  11. Dmitriev, E.A., Matematicheskaya statistika v pochvovedenii (Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science),Moscow, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Il’nitskii, A.P., Carcinogenic hydrocarbons in soil,water, and vegetation, in Kantserogeny v okruzhayushchei srede (Carcinogens in Environment), Moscow,1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klyuev, N.A., Ekologoanaliticheskii kontrol’ stoikikhorganicheskikh zagryaznitelei v okruzhayushchei srede (Ecological Analytical Monitoring of Stable OrganicPollutants in Environment), Moscow, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Complex ecologicalgeochemical studies of the territory of Elektrougli town, Noginskii district, Moscowoblast, Ekol. Vestn., 1998, no. 2.

  15. Kriterii otsenki ekologicheskoi obstanovki territorii dlyavyyavleniya zon chrezvychainoi ekologicheskoi situatsii izon ekologicheskogo bedstviya (Key Assessment Factorsof Environmental Situation of the Territories for Identification of Zones of Urgent Ecological Status andZones of Ecological Disaster), Moscow, 1992.

  16. Kuznetsov, A.E. and Gradova, N.B., Nauchnye osnovy ekobiotekhnologii (Scientific Principles of Ecological Biotechnology), Moscow, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lisovitskaya, O.V. and Terekhova, V.A., Phytotests:general approaches, problems of laboratory tests, andmodern solutions, Dokl. Ekol. Pochvoved., 2010,vol. 13, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maistrenko, V.N. and Klyuev, N.A., Ekologoanaliticheskii monitoring stoikikh organicheskikh zagryaznitelei(Ecological Analytical Monitoring of Stable Organic Pollutants), Moscow, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marchenko, S.A. and Kozhevin, P.A., Functional reaction of soil microbial community as an indicator of pollution by stable organic pollutants, Agro XXI, 2008,nos. 7–9.

  20. Marchenko, S.A., Yakushev, A.N., Borovik, R.V., and Kozhevin, P.A., Implementation of adapted soil microbial complex for bioremediation after soil pollution bypolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Vestn. Mosk. Univ.,Ser. 17: Pochvoved., 2006, no. 4, pp. 39–45

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mayachkina, R.V. and Chugunova, M.V., Peculiaritiesof soil biological testing for ecotoxicological assessment, Vestn. Nizhegor. Univ., Ser. Biol., 2009, no. 1.

  22. Obzor fonovogo sostoyaniya okruzhayushchei sredy naterritorii stran SNG za 2009–2010 gg. (Review of Background Status of Environment in CIS Countries in2009–2010), Izrael’, Yu.A., Ed., Moscow, 2011.

  23. Praktikum po agrokhimii (Manual on Agrochemistry),Mineev, V.G., Ed., Moscow, 2001.

  24. Rovinskii, F.Ya., Teplitskaya, T.A., and Alekseeva, T.A., Fonovyi monitoring politsiklicheskikh aromaticheskikhuglevodorodov (Background Monitoring of PolycyclicAromatic Hydrocarbons), Leningrad, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chernyanskii, S.S., Alekseeva, T.A., Gennadiev, A.N., and Pikovskii, Yu.I., Organic profile of sodgley soilextremely polluted by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Pochvovedenie, 2001, no. 11, pp. 1312–1322

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chernyanskii, S.S., Volosatova, Yu.V., and Krasnopeeva, A.A., Peculiarities of formation of anomalies ofpolyaromatic hydrocarbons in soil, Vestn. Mosk. Univ.,Ser. 5: Geogr., 2007, no. 2, pp. 31-37.

  27. Shurubor, E.I., Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons inthe soilplant system of an oil field (Kama River regionof Perm oblast), Eurasian Soil Sci., 2000, vol. 33,no. 12, pp. 1329–1333

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bergknut, M., Characterization of PAHContaminatedSoils Focusing on Availability, Chemical Composition, and Biological Effects, Sweden, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Erickson, R.J., Ankley, G.T., De Foe, D.L., et al.,Additive toxicity of binary mixtures of phototoxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the oligochaete Lumbriculus variegates, Toxicol. Appl. Pharm., 1999,vol. 154.

  30. Escher, B.I. and Hermens, J.L.M., Modes of action inecotoxicology: their role in body burdens, species sensitivity, QSARs, and mixture effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, vol. 36, pp. 4201–4217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gillette, J.S., Luthy, R.G., Clemett, S.J., and Zare, R.N., Direct observation of polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons on geosorbents at the subparticle scale, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1999, vol. 33, pp. 1185–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Greene, J.C., Bartels, C.L., WarrenHicks, W.J., et al.,Protocols for ShortTerm Toxicity Screening of Hazardous Waste Sites, Washington, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gulden, M. and Seibert, H., Influence of protein binding and lipophilicity on the distribution of chemicalcompounds in vitro systems, Toxicol. Vitro, 1997,vol. 11, pp. 479–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Perminova, I.V., Grechishcheva, N.Yu., Kovalevskii, D.V., et al., Quantification and prediction ofdetoxifying properties of humic substances to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons related to chemical binding, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2001, vol. 35, pp. 3841–3848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Perminova, I.V., Grechishcheva, N.Yu., and Petrosyan, V.S., Relationships between structure and bindingaffinity of humic substances for polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons: Relevance of molecular descriptors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1999, vol. 33, pp. 3781–3787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pickering, R.W., A toxicological review of polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons, J. Toxicol., Cutaneous Ocul.Toxicol., 1999, vol. 18, pp. 101–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pickering, R.W., Toxicity of polyaromatic hydrocarbons other than benzo(a)pyrene: a review, J. Toxicol.,Cutaneous Ocul. Toxicol., 2000, vol. 19, pp. 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. US Environmental Protection Agency, EcologicalEffects Test Guidelines. Seed Germination/Root Elongation Toxicity Test, OPPTS 850.4200, 1996.

  39. US Environmental Protection Agency, Evaluation ofTerrestrial Indicators for Use in Ecological Assessments atHazardous Waste Sites, Corvallis, Oregon, 1992.

  40. Walter, H., Consolaro, F., Gramatica, P., et al., Mixture toxicity of priority pollutants at no observed effect concentrations (NOECs), Ecotoxicology, 2002, vol. 11,pp. 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Stolbova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.V. Stolbova, D.V. Beregela, 2015, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Pochvovedenie, 2015, No. 2, pp. 35–41

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stolbova, V.V., Beregela, D.V. Correlation between phytotoxicity and properties of soils containing a group of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 70, 71–77 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687415020088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687415020088

Keywords

Navigation