Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the criteria for fuzzy classifier learning

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a fuzzy classifier, the maping “inputs–output” is described by the linguistic 〈If–then〉 rules, the antecedents in which contain the fuzzy terms “low,” “average,” “high,” and so on. To increase the correctness, the fuzzy classifier is learned by using experimental data. The problems with equal and different costs of various classification errors are discussed. A new criterion is offered for problems with undistinguishable types of errors, in addition to the two known criteria. A new one implies that the distance between the desired and real fuzzy results of classification for the cases of a wrong decision is weighted by the penalty factor. The learning criteria are generalized for problems of classification with the cost matrix. The conducted computer experiments on the wine recognition and heart disease diagnostics problems show that the best quality parameters of tuning fuzzy classifiers are achieved by a new learning criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuncheva, L.I., Fuzzy classifier design, in Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. vol. 49, Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellman, R., Kalaba, R., and Zadeh, L., Abstraction and pattern classification, J. Mathem. Anal. Appl., 1966, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Rotshtein, A. and Shtovba, S., Identification of a nonlinear dependence by a fuzzy knowledge base in the case of a fuzzy training set, Cybern. Syst. Anal., 2006, vol. 42, pp. 176–182.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishibuchi, H., Nakashima, T., and Nii, M., Classification and Modeling with Linguistic Information Granules: Advanced Approaches to Linguistic Data Mining, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cordon, O., del Jesus, M.J., and Herrera, F., Genetic learning of fuzzy rule–based classification systems coop erating with fuzzy reasoning methods, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 1998, vol. 13, pp. 1025–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shtovba, S.D., Proektirovanie nechetkikh sistem sredstvami MATLAB (Fuzzy System Design by MATLAB Means), Moscow: Goryachaya liniya, Telekom, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rotshtein, A., Design and tuning of fuzzy rule–based system for medical diagnosis, in Fuzzy and NeuroFuzzy Systems in Medicine, Teodorescu, N.H., Kandel, A., and Jain, L.C., Eds., BocaRaton: CRCPress, 1998, pp. 243–289.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibuchi, H., Nakashima, T., and Morisawa, T., Voting in fuzzy rule–based systems for pattern classification problems, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1999, vol. 103, pp. 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duda, R.O. and Hart, P.E., Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1973; Moscow: Mir, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shtovba, S., Pankevich, O., and Dounias, G., Tuning the fuzzy classification models with various learning criteria: The case of credit data classification, Proc. Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Sets and Soft Computing in Economics and Finance, St. Petersburg, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rastrigin, L.A., Adaptatsiya slozhnykh sistem. Metody i prilozheniya (Adaptation of Complex Systems. Methods and Applications), Riga: Zinatne, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bache, K. and Lichman, M., UCI Machine Learning Repository, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml]. Irvine, CA: Univ. Calif., School Inform. Comp. Sci., 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ishibuchi, H. and Yamamoto, T., Fuzzy rule selection by multi–objective genetic local search algorithms and rule evaluation measures in data mining, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2004, vol. 141, pp. 59–88.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Shtovba, S., Ensuring accuracy and transparency of Mamdani fuzzy model in learning by experimental data, J. Autom. Inform. Sci., 2007, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Breiman, L., Technical note: Some properties of splitting criteria, Machine Learning, 1996, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 41–47.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Shtovba.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.D. Shtovba, O.D. Pankevich, A.V. Nagorna, 2015, published in Avtomatika i Vychislitel’naya Tekhnika, 2015, No. 3, pp. 5–16.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shtovba, S.D., Pankevich, O.D. & Nagorna, A.V. Analyzing the criteria for fuzzy classifier learning. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 49, 123–132 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411615030098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411615030098

Keywords

Navigation