Abstract
Endogenous and exogenous agents generate tens of thousands of lesions in the DNA of every cell daily. The maintenance of correct DNA structure by repair systems is crucial for genome functioning. Eukaryotic nuclear DNA is tightly packaged into chromatin, in which it should be successfully repaired. Historically, it is believed that histones are temporarily removed from the repaired DNA. However, numerous recent studies indicate that the chromatin structure affects the repair response, limiting its distribution, altering enzyme activity, and participating in the response choice and restoration of the repaired locus function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christmann, M., Tomicic, M.T., Roos, W.P., and Kaina, B., Mechanisms of human DNA repair: an update, Toxicology, 2003, vol. 193, nos. 1–2, pp. 3–34.
Dexheimer, T.S., DNA repair pathways and mechanisms, in DNA Repair of Cancer Stem Cells, Mathews, L.A., Cabarcas, S.M., and Hurt, E.M., Eds., Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2013, pp. 19–32.
Luger, K., Mader, A.W., Richmond, R.K., Sargent, D.F., and Richmond, T.J., Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution, Nature, 1997, vol. 389, no. 6648, pp. 251–260.
Arents, G. and Moudrianakis, E.N., The histone fold: a ubiquitous architectural motif utilized in DNA compaction and protein dimerization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, vol. 92, no. 24, pp. 11170–11174.
Noll, M., Internal structure of the chromatin subunit, Nucleic Acids Res., 1974, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1573–1578.
Wigler, M.H. and Axel, R., Nucleosomes in metaphase chromosomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 1976, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1463–1471.
Hayes, J.J., Tullius, T.D., and Wolffe, A.P., The structure of DNA in a nucleosome, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1990, vol. 87, no. 19, pp. 7405–7409.
Strand, J.M., Scheffler, K., Bjoras, M., and Eide, L., The distribution of DNA damage is defined by regionspecific susceptibility to DNA damage formation rather than repair differences, DNA Repair (Amst.), 2014, vol. 18, pp. 2014–18.
Tijsterman, M., de Pril, R., Tasseron-de, Jong J.G., and Brouwer, J., Rna polymerase II transcription suppresses nucleosomal modulation of UV-induced (6-4) photoproduct and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimmer repair in yeast, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1999, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 934–940.
Odell, I.D., Wallace, S.S., and Pederson, D.S., Rules of engagement for base excision repair in chromatin, J. Cell Physiol., 2013, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 258–266.
Nouspikel, T. and Hanawalt, P.C., DNA repair in terminally differentiated cells, DNA repair (Amst.), 2002, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–75.
Blainey, P.C., Luo, G., Kou, S.C., Mangel, W.F., Verdine, G.L., Bagchi, B., and Xie, X.S., Nonspecifically bound proteins spin while diffusing along DNA, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 2009, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1224–1229.
Odell, I.D., Newick, K., Heintz, N.H., Wallace, S.S., and Pederson, D.S., Non-specific DNA binding interferes with the efficient excision of oxidative lesions from chromatin by the human DNA glycosylase, neil1, DNA Repair (Amst.), 2010, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 134–143.
Odell, I.D., Barbour, J.E., Murphy, D.L., DellaMaria, J.A., Sweasy, J.B., Tomkinson, A.E., Wallace, S.S., and Pederson, D.S., Nucleosome disruption by DNA ligase III-XRCC1 promotes efficient base excision repair, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2011, vol. 31, no. 22, pp. 4623–4632.
Hinz, J.M., Rodriguez, Y., and Smerdon, M.J., Rotational dynamics of DNA on the nucleosome surface markedly impact accessibility to a DNA repair enzyme, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2010, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 4646–4651.
Murr, R., Loizou, J.I., Yang, Y.G., Cuenin, C., Li, H., Wang, Z.Q., and Herceg, Z., Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks, Nat. Cell Biol., 2006, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 91–99.
Smerdon, M.J., Dna repair and the role of chromatin structure, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 1991, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 422–428.
Gospodinov, A. and Herceg, Z., Shaping chromatin for repair, Mutat. Res., 2013, vol. 752, no. 1, pp. 45–60.
Mandemaker, I.K., Vermeulen, W., and Marteijn, J.A., Gearing up chromatin: a role for chromatin remodeling during the transcriptional restart upon DNA damage, Nucleus, 2014, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 203–210.
Bird, A.W., Yu, D.Y., Pray-Grant, M.G., Qiu, Q., Harmon, K.E., Megee, P.C., Grant, P.A., Smith, M.M., and Christman, M.F., Acetylation of histone H4 by Esal is required for DNA double-strand break repair, Nature, 2002, vol. 419, no. 6905, pp. 411–415.
Downs, J.A., Allard, S., Jobin-Robitaille, O., Javaheri, A., Auger, A., Bouchard, N., Kron, S.J., Jackson, S.P., and Cote, J., Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites, Mol. Cell, 2004, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 979–990.
Fousteri, M. and Mullenders, L.H., Transcriptioncoupled nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells: molecular mechanisms and biological effects, Cell Res., 2008, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 73–84.
van Attikum, H. and Gasser, S.M., The histone code at DNA breaks: a guide to repair?, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2005, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 757–765.
Soria, G., Polo, S.E., and Almouzni, G., Prime, repair, restore: the active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response, Mol. Cell, 2012, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 497–510.
Downey, M. and Durocher, D., Chromatin and DNA repair: the benefits of relaxation, Nat. Cell Biol., 2006, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–10.
Khurana, S., Kruhlak, M.J., Kim, J., Tran, A.D., Liu, J., Nyswaner, K., Shi, L., Jailwala, P., Sung, M.H., Hakim, O., and Oberdoerffer, P., A macrohistone variant links dynamic chromatin compaction to BRCA1dependent genome maintenance, Cell Rep, 2014, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1049–1062.
Li, M.L., Yuan, G., and Greenberg, R.A., Chromatin yo-yo: expansion and condensation during DNA repair, Trends Cell Biol., 2014, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 616–618.
Keogh, M.C., Kim, J.A., and Downey, M., A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery, Nature, 2006, vol. 439, no. 7075, pp. 497–501.
Kusch, T., Florens, L., Macdonald, W.H., Swanson, S.K., Glaser, R.L., Yates, J.R., Abmayr, S.M., Washburn, M.P., and Workman, J.L., Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions, Science, 2004, vol. 306, no. 5704, pp. 2084–2087.
Laugel, V., Cockayne syndrome: the expanding clinical and mutational spectrum, Mech. Ageing Dev., 2013, vol. 134, nos. 5–6, pp. 161–170.
Adam, S., Polo, S.E., and Almouzni, G., Transcription recovery after DNA damage requires chromatin priming by the H3.3 histone chaperone HIRA, Cell, 2013, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 94–106.
Dinant, C., Ampatziadis-Michailidis, G., Lans, H., Tresini, M., Lagarou, A., Grosbart, M., Theil, A.F., van Cappellen, W.A., Kimura, H., Bartek, J., Fousteri, M., Houtsmuller, A.B., Vermeulen, W., and Varteijn, J.A., Enhanced chromatin dynamics by fact promotes transcriptional restart after UV-induced DNA damage, Mol. Cell, 2013, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 469–479.
Oksenych, V., Zhovmer, A., Ziani, S., Mari, P.O., Eberova, J., Nardo, T., Stefanini, M., Giglia-Mari, G., Egly, J.M., and Coin, F., Histone methyltransferase DOTIL drives recovery of gene expression after a genotoxic attack, PLoS Genet., 2013, vol. 9, no. 7, p. e1003611.
Szenker, E., Lacoste, N., and Almouzni, G., A developmental requirement for HIRA-dependent H3.3 deposition revealed at gastrulation in Xenopus, Cell Rep., 2012, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 730–740.
Wilson, M.D., Harreman, M., and Svejstrup, J.Q., Ubiquitylation and degradation of elongating RNA polymerase II: the last resort, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2013, vol. 1829, no. 1, pp. 151–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © N.S. Gerasimova, N.A. Pestov, O.I. Kulaeva, D.V. Nikitin, M.P. Kirpichnikov, V.M. Studitsky, 2015, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Biologiya, 2015, No. 3, pp. 21–25.
About this article
Cite this article
Gerasimova, N.S., Pestov, N.A., Kulaeva, O.I. et al. Repair of chromatinized DNA. Moscow Univ. Biol.Sci. Bull. 70, 122–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392515030050
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392515030050