Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of actinomycete communities associated with Lasius niger and Formica cunicularia ants and their nests

  • Microbiology
  • Published:
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the abundance and biodiversity of actinomycete communities isolated from living ants Lasius niger and Formica cunicularia, as well as their anthills, has been carried out for the first time. The number of actinomycetes detected in L. niger ants is close to the number of actinomycetes in their anthills and one order is higher than that for F. cunicularia. Actinomycete communities of anthills and the intact soil are characterized by a high diversity, equitability, absence of severe dominants, and the presence of common species and differ by number and the range of species. Biodiversity of actinomycetes associated with living ants is considerably lower than in their nests and the surrounding soil and the range of actinomycetes is specific for both the species of ants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones, C.G., Lawton, H.J., and Shachak, M., Organisms as ecosystem engineers, Oikos, 1994, vol. 69, pp. 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Bruyn, L.A., Grant, C.D., and Hulugale, N.E., The impact of ant bioturbation and foraging activities on surrounding soil properties, Dedobiologia, 2000, vol. 44, pp. 609–621.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holec, M. and Frouz, J., The effect of two ant species Lasius niger and Lasius flavus on soil properties in two contrasting habitats, Eur. J. Soil. Biol., 2006, vol. 42, pp. 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cammeraat, E.L.H. and Risch, A.C., The impact of ants on mineral soil properties and processes at different spatial scales, J. App. Entomol., 2008, vol. 132, pp. 285–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frouz, J. and Jilkova, V., The effects of ants on soil properties and processes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Myrmecol. News, 2008, vol. 11, pp. 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dlusskii, G.M., Murav’i roda Formica (Ants of the Genus Formica), Moscow: Nauka, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czechowski, W., Radchnko, A., and Czechowska, W., The Ants of Poland: (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), Warzawa, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthey, A.J. and Williams, S.T., Methods for studying the ecology of actinomycetes, Methods Microbiol., 1990, vol. 22, pp. 533–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dauber, J., Schroeter, D., and Wolters, V., Species specific effects of ants on microbial activity and n-availability in the soils of an old-field, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 2001, vol. 37, pp. 259–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boulton, A.M. and Amberman, K.D., How ant nests increase soil biota richness and abundance: a field experiment, Biodiv. Conserv., 2006, vol. 15, pp. 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boots, B. and Ckopson, N., Linking ecosystem modification by the yellow meadow ant (Lasius flavus) to microbial assemblages in different soil environments, Eur. J. Soil. Biol., 2013, vol. 55, pp. 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Actinomycetes in Biotechnology, Goodfellow, M., Ed., Academic Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shishov, L.L., Tonkonogov, V.D., Lebedeva, I.I., and Gerasimova, M.I., Klassifikatsiya i diagnostika pochv Rossii (Classification and Diagnosis of Russian Soil), Moscow: Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gauze, G.F., Preobrazhenskaya, T.P., Sveshnikova, M.A., Terekhova, L.P., and Maksimova, T.S., Opredelitel’ aktinomitsetov (Identification Guide to Actinomycetes), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Metody pochvennoi biologii i biokhimii (Methods of Soil Biology and Biochemistry) Zvyagintsev, D.G., Ed., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lebedeva, N.V. and Krivolutskii, D.A., Biological diversity and methods for its assessment, in Geografiya i monitoring bioraznoobraziya (Geography and Biodiversity Monitoring), Moscow: Nauchn. Uchebno-Metod. Tsentr, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zvyagintsev, D.G. and Zenova, G.M., Ekologiya aktinomitsetov (Ecology of Actinomycetes), Moscow: Geos, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Uitteker, R., Soobshchestva i ekosistemy (Communities and Ecosystems), Moscow: Progress, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Odum, E., Fundamentals of Ecology, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971, 3d ed.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Magurran, A.E., Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement, London: Chapman and Hall, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Currie, C., A community of ants, fungi and bacteria: a multilateral approach to studying symbiosis, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 2001, vol. 55, pp. 357–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirchink, T.G., Soil fungi as a component biogeocoenosis, in Pochvennye mikroorganizmy kak komponent biogeotsenoza (Soil Microorganisms as a Component of Biogeocoenosis), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lyubarskii, E.L., On the procedure of rapid qualification and comparison of descriptions of Phytocenoses, in Kolichestvennye metody analiza rastitel’nosti (Quantitative Methods of Analysis of Vegetation), Ufa, 1974, pp. 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. V. Zakalyukina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Yu.V. Zakalyukina, M.V. Golichenkov, O.I. Brovkina, T.S. Putyatina, 2014, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Biologiya, 2014, No. 3, pp. 30–36.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zakalyukina, Y.V., Golichenkov, M.V., Brovkina, O.I. et al. Comparative study of actinomycete communities associated with Lasius niger and Formica cunicularia ants and their nests. Moscow Univ. Biol.Sci. Bull. 69, 118–124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392514030109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0096392514030109

Keywords

Navigation