Skip to main content

Phenomenon of visiting in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula Hypoleuca Pall., Passeriformes, Aves) in the breeding period

Abstract

Strange visitors to the pied flycatcher nest-boxes during the brood-rearing period were investigated in the Moscow oblast during 15 seasons. The total amount of visits was 760. Most of the visits (94%) were made by males and 5% and 1% were made by females and young birds with juvenile plumage, respectively. Both bachelor and paired males of various ages were among the visitors. Most of the adult birds and all young ones behaved as “inspectors”; a part of the visitors tried to feed nestlings. Among them, only nine males and a female were constant “helpers.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Brown, J.L., Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds: Ecology and Evolution, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Emlen, S.T., Cooperative Breeding in Birds and Mammals, in Behavioral Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, Krebs, J.R. and Davis, N.B., Eds., Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1991, pp. 305–339.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cockburn, A., Evolution of Helping Behaviour in Cooperatively Breeding Birds, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1998, vol. 29, pp. 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kokko, H., Johnstone, R.A., and Wright, J., The Evolution of Parental and Alloparental Effort in Cooperatively Breeding Groups: When Should Helpers Pay to Stay?, Behav. Ecol., 2002, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Heinsohn, R.G., Cooperative Enhancement of Reproductive Success in White-Winged Choughs, Evol. Ecol., 1992, vol. 6, pp. 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hatchwell, B.J. and Komdeur, J., Ecological Constraints, Life History Traits and the Evolution of Cooperative Breeding, Animal Behav., 2000, vol. 59, pp. 1079–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Inozemtsev, A.A., Rol’ nasekomoyadnykh ptits v lesnykh biotsenozakh (The Role of Insectivorous Birds in Forest Biocenoses), Leningrad: Izd. Leningr. Univ., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ottosson, U., Backman, J., and Smith, H.G., Nest-Attenders in the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) during Nestling Rearing: A Possible Case of Prospective Resource Exploration, Auk, 2001, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1069–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kerimov, A.B., Ivankina, E.V., and Shishkin, B.S., Unstable Sexual Dimorphism and Breeding Parameters of the Pied Flycatcher, Ornitologiya, 1994, no. 26, pp. 13–27.

  10. 10.

    Grinkov, V.G. and Kerimov, A.B., Breeding Strategies and Polymorphism in the Naptual Plumage Color in Male Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca, Passeriformes, Muscicapidae). Possible Mechanisms for the Maintenance of the Phenotypic Structure of the Population, Zool. Zh., 1998, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 825–837.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Drost, R., Uber das Brutkleid Mannlicher Trauerfliegenfanger, Muscicapa hypoleuca, Der Vogelzug, 1936, vol. 6, pp. 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gavrilov, V.M., Kerimov, A.B., Aleksandrov, L.I., Golubeva, T.B., Ivankina, E.V., Ilyina, T.A., and Shishkin, B.S., Energy, Morphophysiological Different Quality of Individuals, and Structure of Populations of Birds. II. Energy, Morphophysiological Different Quality of Individuals, and Population Structure in the Pied Flycatcher, Ornitologiya, 1990, no. 27, pp. 74–97.

  13. 13.

    Jarvi, J., Roskaft, E., Bakken, M., and Zumsteg, B., Evolution of Variation in Male Secondary Sexual Characteristics. A Test of Eight Hypotheses to Pied Flycatchers, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1987, vol. 20, pp. 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ivankina, E.V., Kerimov, A.B., Grinkov, V.G., and Bushuev, A.V., Structural and Functional Aspects of Variability in the Ornamentation of Naptual Plumage of Male Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (Aves: Passeriformes), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2007, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 278–295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Reale, D., Reader, S.M., Sol, D., McDougall, P.T., and Dingemanse, N.J., Integrating Animal Temperament within Ecology and Evolution, Biol. Rev., 2007, vol. 82, pp. 291–318.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ducrest, A.-L., Keller, L., and Roulin, A., Pleiotropy in the Melanocortin System, Coloration and Behavioural Syndromes, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2008, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 502–510.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ivankina, E.V., Ilyina, T.A., and Kerimov, A.B., Variability of the Naptual Plumage and the Female Attraction Strategy: Assessment of the Spatial Organization of Advertising Behavior of Bright-Colored and Critic Male Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca, Passeriformes; Aves), Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1995, vol. 56, no. 6.

  18. 18.

    Ilyina, T.A. and Ivankina, E.V., Seasonal Variation of Singing Activity and Relative Effect of Advertising Behavior of Males with Different Plumage Colour in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca, Acta Ornithologica, 2001, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sokolov, L.V., Philopatry and Dispersion of Birds, Tr. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1991, vol. 230, p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Ilyina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.A. Ilyina, 2012, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Biologiya, 2012, No. 2, pp. 49–53.

About this article

Cite this article

Ilyina, T.A. Phenomenon of visiting in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula Hypoleuca Pall., Passeriformes, Aves) in the breeding period. Moscow Univ. Biol.Sci. Bull. 67, 88–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3103/S009639251201004X

Download citation

Keywords

  • pied flycatcher
  • visitor
  • population
  • brood-rearing