Abstract
Hafnium oxide films HfO\({}_{x}\) with a thickness of about 40 nm were obtained by electron beam sputtering at different oxygen flow rates in the chamber. The electrophysical properties of the films were studied in air and in a vacuum. It has been shown that the temperature dependences of film conductivity, measured in a vacuum in the temperature range from 20 to 180\({}^{\circ}\)C, have an activation character with an activation energy of 0.82\(\pm\) 0.02 eV. It is assumed that in the resulting films, charge transfer is determined by the activation of electrons into the conduction band from the donor level associated with oxygen vacancies. It was found that the conductivity of the films in air changes greatly with varying the oxygen flow, while in a vacuum, the conductivity is practically independent of the oxygen flow. This indicates significant differences in the surface properties of the films obtained at different oxygen flows in the chamber during the deposition process.
REFERENCES
Resistive Switching: From Fundamentals of Nanoionic Redox Processes to Memristive Device Applications, Ed. by D. Ielmini and R. Waser (Wiley-VCH, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527680870
I. Valov, ChemElectroChem 1, 26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201300165
C. Chen, C. Song, J. Yang, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 253509 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4730601
S. J. Song, J. Y. Seok, J. H. Yoon, et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 3443 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03443
K. M. Kim, B. J. Choi, S. J. Song, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 156, G213 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3240201
M. N. Martyshov, A. V. Emelyanov, V. A. Demin, et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 034016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.034016
H.-D. Kim, H.-M. An, S. M. Hong, and T. G. Kim, Phys. Status Solidi A 210, 1822 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201329021
C. Chen, Y. C. Yang, F. Zeng, and F. Pan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 083502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3483158
T. Sakamoto, H. Sunamura, H. Kawaura, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3032 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1572964
P. Y. Lai, and J.-S. Chen, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2010.2099102
T. Kondo, S. M. Lee, M. Malicki, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200700567
S. Goswami, S. Nandy, A. N. Banerjee, et al., Adv. Mater. 29, 1703079 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703079
B. S. Shvetsov, A. N. Matsukatova, A. A. Minnekhanov, et al., Tech. Phys. Lett. 45, 1103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785019110130
S. Dirkmann, J. Kaiser, and Ch. Wenger, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 14857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b19836
V. A. Voronkovskii, V. S. Aliev, A. K. Gerasimova, and D. R. Islamov, Mater. Res. Express 5, 016402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaa099
Y. Zhang, G. Q. Mao, X. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 7232 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27575-z
M. Ismail, U. Chand, Ch. Mahata, et al., J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 96, 94 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.025
P. Jančovič, B. Hudec, E. Dobročka, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 312, 112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.018
H. GarcaHa, J. Boo, G. Vinuesa, et al., Electronics 10, 2816 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222816
T. Guo, T. Tan, Z. Liu, J. Mater. Sci. 50, 7043 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9257-9
M. F. Quiñonez, L. Suarez, J. E. Ordoñez, et al., Mater. Today: Proc. 14, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.071
M. I. Hossain, Y. Zakaria, A. Zikri, et al., Mater. Technol. 37, 248 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2020.1830551
W. Banerjee, Q. Liu, and H. Hwang, J. Appl. Phys. 127, 051101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5136264
D. S. Jeong and Ch. S. Hwang, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 113701 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2135895
F. Gunkel, D. V. Christensen, Y. Z. Chen, and N. Pryds, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 120505 (2020). doi https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143309.
E. A. Forsh, A. V. Marikutsa, M. N. Martyshov, P. A. Forsh, et al., J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 111, 653 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377611010016X
T. V. Belysheva, M. I. Ikim, A. S. Ilin, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 10, 810 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793116050171
V. A. Gritsenko, T. V. Perevalov, and D. R. Islamov, Phys. Rep. 613, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.11.002
T. V. Perevalov, V. Sh. Aliev, and V. A. Gritsenko, Microelectron. Eng. 109, 21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2013.03.005
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors express their gratitude to K.N. Garbuzov for assistance in manufacturing the samples.
Funding
The research was carried out with the support of the grant from the Russian Science Foundation no. 23-19-00268, https://rscf.ru/project/23-19-00268/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuchumov, I.D., Martyshov, M.N., Zhigunov, D.M. et al. Conductivity of Hafnium Oxide Films Obtained by Electron-Beam Sputtering. Moscow Univ. Phys. 79, 64–68 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134924700139
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134924700139