Abstract
In this work, numerical simulations are used to study ambipolar organic field-effect phototransistors, in which a spatially localized photoelectric effect can take place. This effect consists in the fact that there is a small spatially localized photosensitive region in the transistor channel, the position of which can be controlled by changing the gate voltage. The purpose of this work is to analyze the relationship between the form of the field dependence of the bound electron-hole pairs (\(e/h\) pairs) dissociation probability and characteristics of the studied ambipolar phototransistors such as normalized photocurrent, spatial resolution, and response time. It is shown that the optimal form of the field dependence of \(e/h\) pairs dissociation probability is stepwise-like form, which can provide a high spatial resolution at high values of the normalized photocurrent without degrading the response time of the phototransistor. This shape can be achieved when the organic semiconductor has an extremely narrow distribution of \(e/h\) pairs by size, described by the delta function. Also, using the example of several distributions of various shapes, it is shown that a decrease in the width of the distribution leads to an increase in the spatial resolution. Approaches to the selection and modification of organic semiconductor materials that would provide the most pronounced spatially localized photoelectric effect in ambipolar field-effect transistors are discussed.
REFERENCES
A. Facchetti, Chem. Mater. 23, 733 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm102419z
A. R. Murphy and J. M. J. Früchet, Chem. Rev. 107, 1066 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0501386
J. C. Hummelen, B. W. Knight, F. LePeq, et al., J. Org. Chem. 60, 532 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00108a012
X.-Z. Bo, C. Y. Lee, M. S. Strano, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 182102 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1906316
J. H. Burroughes, D. D. C. Bradley, A.R. Brown, et al., Nature 347, 539 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/347539a0
G. Horowitz, Adv. Mater. 10, 365 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199803)10:5<365::AID-ADMA365>3.0.CO;2-U
G. Yu, J. Gao, J. C. Hummelen, et al., Science 270, 1789 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5243.178
A. L. Mannanov, D. O. Balakirev, E. D. Papkovskaya, et al., Molecules 28, 368 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010368
K.-J. Baeg, M. Binda, D. Natali, et al., Adv. Mater. 25, 4267 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201204979
A. R. Tuktarov, R. B. Salikhov, A. A. Khuzin, et al., RSC Adv. 9, 7505 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA00939F
A. N. Aleshin, I. P. Shcherbakov, and F. S. Fe- dichkin, Phys. Solid State 54, 1586 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783412080033
S. Nam, H. Han, J. Seo, et al., Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1600264 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201600264
V. A. Trukhanov, JETP Lett. 109, 776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364019120105
B. P. Rand, J. Xue, M. Lange, and S. R. Forrest, IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett. 15, 1279 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2003.816659
D. Kabra, T. B. Singh, and K. S. Narayan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5073 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1823597
V. A. Trukhanov, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 75, 342–353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134920040128
L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 54, 554 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.54.554
C. L. Braun, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4157 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447243
L. J. A. Koster, E. C. P. Smits, V. D. Mihailetchi, and P. W. M. Blom, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085205 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205
A. L. Mannanov, P. S. Savchenko, Yu. N. Luponosov, et al., Org. Electron. 78, 105588 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2019.105588
V. D. Mihailetchi, L. J. A. Koster, J. C. Hummelen, and P. W. M. Blom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 216601 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.216601
A. Mozumbder, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 4305 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1680905
D. S. Sethi, H. T. Choi, and C. L. Braun, Chem. Phys. Lett. 74, 223 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(80)85146-3
T. E. Goliber and J. H. Perlstein, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4162 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447244
M. Saladina, P. S. Marqués, A. Markina, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202007479
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-79-10122, https://rscf.ru/ project/22-79-10122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Trukhanov, V.A. Influence of the Bound Electron–Hole Pairs Dissociation Probability Field Dependence Form on the Photocurrent and Spatial Resolution of Organic Field-Effect Phototransistors. Moscow Univ. Phys. 78, 817–827 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134923060188
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134923060188