Abstract
In recent times, Monte Carlo simulations are gaining widespread recognition as the most precise tool for calculating particle interactions with matter. In this study, we investigated two primary aspects. Firstly, we examined how the average excitation energy of water \((I_{W})\) influences the location of the Bragg peak (BP). Secondly, we used the particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) to study the Bragg curve of \({}^{12}\)C ion beam having an energy of 200 MeV/u in three different mediums: water, soft tissue, and bone. Lastly, we examined the impact of secondary particles on the overall dose. Our findings indicate that the average excitation energy of water strongly influences the position of the BP. The tail dose beyond the BP primarily results from secondary fragments of the primary carbon ion beams. Furthermore, the PHITS code accurately reproduces the measured Bragg curves.
REFERENCES
R. R. Wilson, Radiology 47, 487 (1946). PMID: 20274616. https://doi.org/10.1148/47.5.487
O. Jakel, Br. J. Radiol. 93, 20190428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190428
M. Saager, Ch. Glowa, P. Peschke, et al., Radiat. Oncol. 15, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1439-1
U. Amaldi, G. Kraft, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1861 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/68/8/R04
I. Kantemiris, P. Karaiskos, P. Papagiannis, and A. Angelopoulos, Med. Phys. 38, 6585 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3662911
Ch. P. Karger and P, Peschke, Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 01TR02 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa9102
J. M. Pitarke, R. H. Ritchie, P. M. Echenique, and E. Zaremba, Eur. Phys. Lett. 24, 613 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/24/7/018
M. J. Berger, M. Inokuti, H. H. Anderson, et al., ICRU Report No. 37 (1984).
T. Sato, Y. Iwamoto, Sh. Hashimoto, et al., J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 55, 684 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890
A. Bardane, J. Tajmouaati, and A. Maghnouj, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 75, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S002713492001004X
S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. al Amako, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
A. Ferrari, J. Ranft, P. R. Sala, and A. Fasso, FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005) no. CERN-2005-10 (CERN, 2005). https://doi.org/10.2172/877507
G. Battistoni, F. Cerutti, A. Fasso, et al., in AIP Conf. Proc. (American Institute of Physics, 2007), Vol. 896, p. 31.
M. E. Rising, J. Ch. Armstrong, S. R. Bolding, et al., MCNPCo Code Version 6.3.0 Release Notes. (LA-UR-22-33103, Rev. 1), January, 2023.
A. V. Dementyev and N. M. Sobolevsky, Radiat. Meas. 30, 553 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00231-0
A. Boudard, J. Cugnon, J.-C. David, et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 014606 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014606
K. Niita, S. Chiba, T. Maruyama, et al. Phys. Rev. C 52, 2620 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.52.2620
K. Iida, A. Kohama, and K. Oyamatsu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 044201 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.76.044201
S. Furihata, in Proc. Monte Carlo 2000 Conf., Lisbon, 2000 (Springer, 2001), p. 1045.
K. Niita, Y. Iwamoto, T. Sato, et al., in Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology (EDP Sciences, 2007), p. 1167.
H. Hirayama, Y. Namito, A. F. Bielajew, S. J. Wil- derman, and W. R. Nelson, The egs5 code system, SLAC-Report-730, 10:877459 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2172/877459
N. Ounoughi, Y. Dribi, A. Boukhellout, and F. Kharfi, Pol. J. Med. Phys. Eng. 28, 160 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0019
H. Weick, H. Geissel, N. Iwasa, et al., GSI Scientific Report, p. 2018-1 (2017).
P. Steidl, D. Schardt, Gh. Iancu, et al., Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 43 (2008).
H. Bischel and T. Hiraoka, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 66, 345 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(92)95995-4
H. Bichsel, T. Hiraoka, and K. Omata, Radiat. Res. 153 (2), 208 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0208]2.0.CO;2
P. Helmut, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 255, 435 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.034
E. Haettner, H. Iwase, M. Krämer, G. Kraft, and D. Schardt, Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 8265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8265
G. F. Knoll. Radiation Detection and Measurement (Wiley, 2010).
J. Soltani-Nabipour, A. Khorshidi, F. Shojai, and Kh. Khorami, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52, 2410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.03.010
C. K. Ying, D. Bolst, L. T. Tran, et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 851, 012033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/851/1/012033
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport System (PHITS) code was made available to the authors by the Director of the Center for Computational Science and e-Systems at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). We also acknowledge the contributions of the scientists from the Materials and Subatomic Physics Laboratory, faculty of science, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra.
Funding
This work was supported by the Intellect Foundation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
El Bekkouri, H., Al Ibrahmi, E.M., El-Asery, M. et al. Simulation of Particle Interactions with Matter Using PHITS Monte Carlo Code: Physical Aspects of Bragg Curve for Carbon Ion Therapy. Moscow Univ. Phys. 78, 804–809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134923060048
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134923060048